All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Amalgamation

The Income Tax Act's term for a merger where property, liabilities and at least 75% of shareholders by value carry across — a qualifying amalgamation lets shareholders swap shares tax-free at the point of merger.

In plain language

"Merger" is not a term the Income Tax Act defines. What it defines instead is amalgamation — a more precise, tested concept with its own conditions, and its own tax consequences for the companies and their shareholders.

An amalgamation is the merger of one or more companies with another company, or of two or more companies to form a new one — provided property, liabilities and (in value) at least 75% of shareholders all carry across to the resulting company (see /glossary/amalgamating-and-amalgamated-company for the exact test). Get the classification right, and shareholders swapping shares of the old company for shares of the new one pay no tax at that moment. Get it wrong, and the exchange is simply a taxable sale.

How it works

The tax treatment runs in two stages, and they are computed differently depending on whether the original shares were capital assets or stock-in-trade.

At the time of allotment of the amalgamated company's shares — where the original shares were held as capital assets: no tax arises under Section 47(vii), because the exchange is not treated as a transfer. Where the original shares were held as stock-in-trade: the exchange is taxed immediately, as profits and gains from business or profession.

At the time of eventual sale of the amalgamated company's shares:

  • If held as a capital asset: the cost of acquisition of the amalgamated company's shares is the amount originally paid for the shares of the amalgamating company, and the period of holding is reckoned from the date of acquisition of the original shares — not from the date of the amalgamation. Ordinary equity capital gains rules (Section 111A/112A, or 112 for unlisted shares) then apply.
  • If held as stock-in-trade: the fair market value of the amalgamated company's shares, as on the date of the scheme of amalgamation, is treated as the actual cost, and gains on eventual sale are business income.

A worked example

Mr X buys 10,000 shares of A Ltd on 1 April 2023 for Rs 58 each, held as an investment. On 1 August 2024, A Ltd amalgamates with B Ltd to form AB Ltd, and Mr X is allotted 8,000 shares of AB Ltd. He sells them for Rs 100 each on 1 September 2024, paying STT.

At the amalgamation itself: no tax — the exchange of A Ltd shares for AB Ltd shares is not a transfer, since Mr X held them as capital assets and the merger meets the amalgamation test.

At the sale of AB Ltd shares:

Period of holding: 01-04-2023 to 31-08-2024 = 17 months → long-term
Sale price (8,000 x 100)                         8,00,000
Less: cost of original A Ltd shares (10,000 x 58) (5,80,000)
Long-term capital gain                            2,20,000
Tax @ 12.5% under Section 112A, on gain above Rs 1,25,000

The holding period is counted from 1 April 2023 — the date he bought the original A Ltd shares — not from 1 August 2024, the amalgamation date, even though he has held the actual AB Ltd shares for barely a month.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 13 (Tax Provisions for Special Cases), section 13.5, sets out the full amalgamation test, the Section 47(vii) exemption at allotment, and Example 8, which is reproduced above. Expect a full capital gains computation carrying the original cost and holding period through a merger, and a question on whether tax arises at the point of share exchange.

Common exam traps

  • No tax at the exchange, for capital-asset shareholders — tax is deferred to the eventual sale of the new shares, not eliminated.
  • Period of holding runs from the ORIGINAL shares' acquisition date, not the amalgamation date — a very commonly mis-answered point.
  • Cost of acquisition of the new shares equals the original cost of the old shares, unadjusted for the exchange ratio's market value.
  • Stock-in-trade holders are taxed immediately on the exchange, and their cost basis for the new shares resets to fair market value at the amalgamation date — the opposite treatment to capital-asset holders.
  • A merger failing the 75%-value or property/liability tests is not an "amalgamation" for tax purposes at all — it is simply a sale, taxed in full at the exchange.

Check yourself

  1. 1.Under the Income Tax Act definition of amalgamation, what proportion of shareholders of the amalgamating company must become shareholders of the amalgamated company?

    1. a)Not less than 50 per cent in number
    2. b)Not less than 75 per cent in value of the shares
    3. c)Not less than 90 per cent in value of the shares
    4. d)All shareholders without exception
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) Not less than 75 per cent in value of the shares

    The definition requires that shareholders holding NOT LESS THAN 75% IN VALUE of the shares in the amalgamating company (other than shares already held by, or by a nominee for, the amalgamated company or its subsidiary) become shareholders of the amalgamated company. The other two conditions are that all the property and all the liabilities of the amalgamating company become those of the amalgamated company. Note it is 75 per cent in value, not in number.

  2. 2.Why does no tax arise at the time of a share split or consolidation?

    1. a)Because section 47 specifically exempts splits and consolidations
    2. b)Because splitting or consolidation is not covered within the definition of transfer in section 2(47), and section 55 carries the cost through
    3. c)Because the shareholder receives no new shares
    4. d)Because SEBI regulations prohibit taxing corporate actions
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) Because splitting or consolidation is not covered within the definition of transfer in section 2(47), and section 55 carries the cost through

    The workbook reasons that splitting or consolidation of shares is NOT COVERED WITHIN THE DEFINITION OF TRANSFER in section 2(47), and that section 55 provides that the cost shall be determined with reference to the cost of acquisition of the shares from which such asset is derived. It adds expressly that this is so "though there is no specific exemption provided for this purpose under section 47" — unlike amalgamations, preference conversions and stock lending, which do rely on section 47.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series X-B

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it