Cheque Truncation System
Also written CTS · Cheque truncation
An RBI system, started in 2010, in which the physical cheque stops at the presenting bank and an electronic image travels to the drawee bank for payment, cutting clearing time, transit cost and delay.
In plain language
Cheque truncation means stopping the flow of the physical cheque issued by a drawer to the drawee branch. Instead of carrying the paper from branch to branch and city to city, the system sends an electronic image of the cheque to the drawee bank for payment.
The Cheque Truncation System is a project of the Reserve Bank of India, commenced in 2010, for faster clearing of cheques. With CTS, in the workbook's words, physical cheques do not move between locations for clearing; cheque images of requisite quality move in the CTS processing cycle instead.
For mutual funds this matters because a cheque's value to the investor depends on how fast it becomes clear funds — and the NAV he gets depends on that.
How it works
The workbook lists what truncation removes: the need to move physical instruments across branches, which gives an effective reduction in the time required for payment of cheques, the associated cost of transit, and delays in processing — speeding up collection or realisation.
That changed how mutual funds look at cheque types:
| Cheque | What it involves | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Transfer cheque | Investor banks with the mutual fund's bank; a transfer within the same bank | Accepted |
| Local cheque | Different bank, same city; goes through the local clearing house | Accepted |
| At par / multi-city cheque | As good as drawn on any branch of the same bank; treated as a local cheque at any branch | Accepted |
| Outstation cheque | Paying account in another city; two clearing houses | Not accepted — realisation takes time and affects NAV applicability |
The workbook adds that in modern banking, there is no practical difference between a local cheque and an outstation cheque. Mutual funds still do not accept outstation cheques.
Images do not remove the registrar's checks. The RTA still verifies that the cheque is not stale — not more than 3 months old — and not post-dated, that amounts in words and figures match, that it is signed and not mutilated, and that the scheme name matches. It sends instruments for clearing in stipulated time, reconciles returns, and ensures units are not issued on a returned cheque.
A worked example
Illustrative numbers.
Mr Kapoor hands in an application at an ISC with a local cheque for Rs 2,00,000 for a debt scheme. The form and cheque are time stamped together.
The collecting bank does not send the paper cheque to Mr Kapoor's bank. Its CTS processing cycle sends an image of acceptable quality. His bank sees the image, checks it and pays. The funds become available for utilisation, and the RTA applies the closing NAV of that day — say Rs 40.00:
Stamp duty (0.005%) = Rs 10.00
Net investable = Rs 1,99,990.00
Units = 1,99,990 ÷ 40.00 = 4,999.750
Now the other outcome. His bank returns the cheque for insufficient funds. The collecting banker's reverse feed marks it bounced, the RTA reconciles, and no units are issued. There is nothing to reverse, because no units were created before realisation.
And a third version: Mr Kapoor's cousin writes an outstation cheque, drawn on an account in another city with no multi-city facility. The ISC does not accept it at all.
Why NISM asks about it
Chapter 13 (Banking Operations in Mutual Funds) mentions CTS in the cheque discussion in section 13.1.2 and defines it in section 13.4.2 under Electronic Clearing Mechanisms, alongside NPCI and NACH. Its sample question asks which instrument is not valid for subscription — the outstation cheque. Chapter 14 (Financial Transactions) supplies the payment instrument checks the RTA runs on every cheque, and Chapter 13.5 the rule that units are never issued on a returned cheque.
Common exam traps
- CTS is an RBI project, commenced in 2010. Not NPCI's, and not SEBI's.
- Truncation stops the physical cheque, not the cheque as an instrument. Investors still write cheques; the image travels.
- Outstation cheques are not accepted by mutual funds, because realisation delays affect NAV applicability — even though the workbook says there is no practical difference between local and outstation cheques in modern banking.
- An at-par cheque is treated as a local cheque when presented at any branch of the drawee bank.
- Faster clearing does not relax instrument checks: a cheque over 3 months old is stale, and post-dated cheques are not accepted.
- Units are not issued on a returned cheque. The RTA's reconciliation of the bank's reverse feed enforces it.
Check yourself
1.Which of the following correctly describes the Cheque Truncation System (CTS)?
- a)An RBI project commenced in 2010 in which the flow of the physical cheque to the drawee branch is stopped and an electronic image of the cheque is sent to the drawee bank for payment
- b)A system in which the physical cheque is couriered to the drawee branch with an electronic advice sent ahead of it
- c)An NPCI system that converts every cheque into a NACH debit mandate
- d)An NPCI project incorporated in December 2008 to replace ECS for repetitive payments
Show the answer
Answer: (a) An RBI project commenced in 2010 in which the flow of the physical cheque to the drawee branch is stopped and an electronic image of the cheque is sent to the drawee bank for payment
The workbook: "CTS is a project of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), commenced in 2010, for faster clearing of cheques. Cheque truncation means stopping the flow of the physical cheques issued by a drawer to the drawee branch. Instead of the physical instrument, an electronic image of the cheque is sent to the drawee bank for payment."
The benefit: "This eliminates the need to move the physical instruments across branches resulting in an effective reduction in the time required for payment of cheques, the associated cost of transit and delays in processing, etc., thus speeding up the process of collection or realization of cheques." Page 178 puts it the same way: "physical cheques do not move between locations for clearing, instead cheque images of requisite quality move in the CTS processing cycle."
Option B is wrong — the whole point of truncation is that the physical cheque does not travel.
Option C is wrong — CTS clears cheques; NACH handles electronic mandates. They are separate systems.
Option D mixes up two facts about NPCI and NACH. NPCI "was incorporated as a Section 25 Company in December 2008", and NACH "has been introduced in place of ECS for repetitive payments." Neither describes CTS, which is an RBI project.
Where this is taught
Free preparation for NISM Series II-BRelated terms
- Collecting bankersThe banks a mutual fund scheme appoints to collect investors' payments into its collection accounts, send back reverse feeds of cleared and bounced instruments, and confirm NFO collections before allotment.
- Cut-off timeThe SEBI-prescribed clock time that, read together with the time stamp on the request, decides which day's NAV a mutual fund transaction is priced at.
- NIGOA transaction the registrar has flagged as "Not in Good Order" because the application and the money do not reconcile or the paperwork is defective — units are not issued until it is fixed.
- NPCIThe National Payments Corporation of India — the umbrella body for retail payments and settlement, set up with RBI and IBA support, which runs NACH and the account validation used to verify investors' bank accounts.
- Third-party chequeA payment for a mutual fund investment drawn from a bank account of which the first holder is not an account holder — not acceptable, and the reason registrars run third-party verification on every subscription.
- Demand draftsThe payment instrument mutual funds accept and reimburse up to the limit stated in the offer document, for investors in locations with no branch or Investor Service Centre nearby.
- Promissory noteA written, unconditional undertaking signed by its maker to pay a certain sum of money to a named person, to that person's order, or to the bearer — defined by Section 4 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.