NISM Professor

Customer Acquisition Cost

Also written CAC · Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) · Cost of acquiring a customer

The average cost of winning one new customer — read against customer lifetime value, it says whether a start-up is buying revenue at a profit or at a loss.

In plain language

Customer Acquisition Cost measures the average cost of acquiring a new customer. A lower CAC indicates efficient marketing and sales techniques, which can ensure long-term sustainability and scalability.

On its own the number means very little — Rs 600 to win a customer is cheap for a car dealer and ruinous for a Rs 200-a-month app. It becomes meaningful only when set against Customer Lifetime Value (CLTV), the total revenue generated from a customer over the entire relationship with the start-up.

And the workbook is direct about why an investor looks: if the CAC is very high, there are high chances that the start-up would not be able to make profits from its operations.

How it works

CLTV is computed as the average purchase value of customers multiplied by the average number of purchases made by them.

The CLTV/CAC ratio is what allows comparison between two different companies in the same industry. The workbook's illustration: a company with a customer acquisition cost of USD 50 and a lifetime value of USD 250 per new customer has a CLTV/CAC ratio of 5x.

Who uses it and when. Angel investors, investing at the idea and early-product stage, look at CAC and customer lifetime value to measure how much the start-up is spending per customer to get its revenue from that person. Venture capital investors, who come in once there is revenue, are also very cautious while investing in companies with a high CAC, because it hampers long-term growth and sustainability — alongside the MRR and ARR they use to gauge the consistency and sustainability of revenue.

Why it is fragile. CAC is an average over a cohort, and it rises as a company exhausts its cheapest channels. It is also the metric most easily flattered by discounting: a company can cut headline CAC by buying customers who churn, which raises CAC in substance while lowering it on the slide. That is why the ratio, and churn, travel with it.

The formula

CAC   = Sales and marketing spend / Number of new customers acquired

CLTV  = Average purchase value x Average number of purchases

Ratio = CLTV / CAC

A worked example

Tulsi Direct, a D2C personal-care brand, is raising a Rs 40 crore Series B from a Category II AIF. Its numbers for the year:

Sales and marketing spend                    Rs 18.00 crore
New customers acquired                          3,00,000
CAC   18,00,00,000 / 3,00,000              =  Rs 600

Average purchase value                        Rs 900
Average number of purchases per customer          4
CLTV  900 x 4                              =  Rs 3,600

CLTV / CAC   3,600 / 600                   =  6.0x

At 6x the business looks strong. Then the fund runs the same arithmetic on the most recent quarter, after the brand pushed into a new city with heavy discounting:

Spend in the quarter                         Rs  9.00 crore
New customers                                    60,000
CAC                                          Rs 1,500
Average purchases fell to                          2.4
CLTV  900 x 2.4                            =  Rs 2,160

CLTV / CAC   2,160 / 1,500                 =  1.44x

The headline annual ratio is 6x; the incremental ratio on the money being spent today is 1.44x. Every new rupee of growth is barely profitable, and the discounting that bought the customers is also what shortened their relationship.

On a Rs 40 crore cheque, that is the difference between funding a machine that turns Rs 1 into Rs 6 and funding one that turns Rs 1 into Rs 1.44 — which is why the fund prices the round off the incremental cohort, not the annual average.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 11 section 11.1.2 puts CAC and CLV in the hands of angel and venture capital investors as a screen; Chapter 14 section 14.8.1 lists CAC, CLTV and the CLTV/CAC ratio among the valuation metrics used for start-up valuation and performance assessment. Expect a definition-matching question across the metric list, and a ratio computation.

Common exam traps

  • CAC is a cost — lower is better. CLTV is a value — higher is better. Answer options routinely invert one of them.
  • The ratio is the comparable number, not CAC alone, and the workbook restricts the comparison to companies in the same industry.
  • CLTV in this workbook is average purchase value times average number of purchases. No margin, no discounting — do not import a more elaborate formula into an exam answer.
  • Angels look at CAC and CLV at the idea stage; VCs look at CAC alongside MRR and ARR. The workbook assigns the metrics to stages deliberately.
  • Churn silently changes CLTV, and therefore the ratio, without CAC moving at all.
  • A falling CAC can mean better marketing or a shift to cheaper, worse customers. The metric cannot tell you which.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XIX-D

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it