All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Customer concentration ratio

The share of a company's revenue earned from its largest customers — a high ratio signals dependence on a handful of clients who could walk away or squeeze pricing.

In plain language

Some businesses earn from thousands of small customers. Others earn most of their revenue from just a handful of large ones.

The second kind carries a real risk: if one big client leaves, revenue can fall sharply overnight. Customer concentration ratio measures exactly how exposed a company is to this.

How it works

The workbook flags this directly for the IT services and BPO sector, where companies are "heavily reliant on a handful of customers, which, one hand gives a steady stream of revenue while on the other creates high customer concentration ratio." It even names a specific tracked metric: the number of "million dollar" customers — clients billed more than a million US dollars a year.

The same idea appears in the workbook's SWOT framework, but with an important classification: low customer concentration is listed as a strength, and high customer concentration as a weakness — both internal to the company, not external threats.

A worked example

An Indian IT services company reports annual revenue of Rs 3,200 crore. Its top five clients together contribute Rs 1,760 crore.

Top-5 customer concentration ratio = 1,760 ÷ 3,200 = 55%

Its single largest client alone contributes Rs 640 crore, 20% of total revenue. If that one client decides to move the work in-house or to a competitor, the company loses a fifth of its revenue overnight — exactly the exposure the ratio is designed to flag before it happens.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 6.7.3 (IT services/BPO/KPO KPIs) names the metric directly, and Chapter 7.5.1–7.5.2 (SWOT strengths and weaknesses) classifies it. Expect a question testing whether high customer concentration belongs in SWOT as a weakness or a threat — the workbook is explicit that it is a weakness.

Common exam traps

  • High customer concentration is a weakness (internal), not a threat (external). The workbook draws this line explicitly elsewhere: a risk is a "threat" only if it comes from outside the company; a risk arising from the company's own client mix is a weakness. This is a direct trap in a SWOT classification question.

Check yourself

  1. 1.Which set of metrics does the workbook specifically identify for the IT services / BPO / KPO sector?

    1. a)ARPU, subscriber churn rate and cost of subscriber acquisition
    2. b)Average FTEs billed, revenue per FTE, bench strength and attrition, constant currency growth, and customer concentration ratio
    3. c)Net interest margin, CASA ratio and capital adequacy
    4. d)Passenger km, price per passenger km and occupancy rate
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) Average FTEs billed, revenue per FTE, bench strength and attrition, constant currency growth, and customer concentration ratio

    IT services price on head count per project per month — the full-time equivalent or FTE. The constraints are availability of workforce, foreign currency fluctuation (the sector is largely export-oriented), and customer concentration where a handful of clients supply much of the revenue.

    So the metrics follow the unit and the constraints: average number of FTEs billed, average revenue per FTE, bench strength (spare capacity) and attrition rates, constant currency growth rates, and customer concentration ratio together with the number of million-dollar customers — those billed more than 1 million USD per annum.

    Option A is telecom, option C is banks and NBFCs, and option D is airlines and transport. Each set is built from a different unit of pricing, which is the fastest way to place any KPI list in the right sector.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XV

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it