Default waterfall
The fixed order in which a clearing corporation uses its resources to cover a member default: defaulter's money first, then insurance, its own capital, the Core SGF, and last a haircut to pay-outs.
In plain language
A clearing corporation guarantees settlement. When a member fails, somebody's money has to cover the gap. The default waterfall is the pre-agreed answer to "whose money, and in what order?"
The principle is simple: the defaulter pays first, and innocent members pay last. The water flows down a series of pools. Only when one pool is empty does the loss spill into the next.
Because the order is fixed in advance, every participant knows exactly how exposed it is before a default ever happens. That certainty is what lets the market keep trading calmly when a broker goes down.
How it works
The workbook (section 4.3.3) sets out the order in which the Settlement Guarantee Fund is used:
| Step | Resource |
|---|---|
| a | Monies of the defaulting member, including its primary contribution to Core SGF(s) and its excess monies in other segments |
| b | Insurance, if any |
| c | Clearing corporation resources equal to 5% of the segment MRC |
| d | Core SGF of the segment, in this order: (I) penalties; (II) CC contribution to the extent of at least 25% of segment MRC; (III) the rest of Core SGF - CC, stock exchange and non-defaulting members' primary contributions, pro rata |
| e | A proportion of remaining CC resources (excluding its contributions to other segments' Core SGFs and Rs 100 crore) equal to segment MRC / sum of all segments' MRCs. The Rs 100 crore is excluded only when those remaining resources exceed Rs 100 crore |
| f | CC/SE contributions to other segments' Core SGFs (after meeting those segments' obligations) and remaining CC resources, as approved by SEBI |
| g | Capped additional contribution by non-defaulting members of the segment |
| h | Any remaining loss: pro-rata haircut to pay-outs |
The cap in step (g) is the lower of 2 times the member's primary contribution to Core SGF, or 10% of the segment's Core SGF on the date of default in equity and debt segments, and 20% in the derivatives segment.
A worked example
All figures here are illustrative; the percentages are the workbook's. A clearing member defaults in the equity cash segment, leaving a loss of Rs 150 crore. The segment's MRC is Rs 800 crore.
| Step | Resource available | Used | Loss left |
|---|---|---|---|
| a. Defaulter's monies | Rs 40 crore | Rs 40 crore | Rs 110 crore |
| b. Insurance | nil | - | Rs 110 crore |
| c. CC resources (5% of Rs 800 crore) | Rs 40 crore | Rs 40 crore | Rs 70 crore |
| d(I). Penalties in Core SGF | Rs 5 crore | Rs 5 crore | Rs 65 crore |
| d(II). CC contribution (at least 25% of MRC = Rs 200 crore) | Rs 200 crore | Rs 65 crore | nil |
The loss is fully absorbed at step d(II). Not a rupee of any non-defaulting member's contribution has been touched.
Now the cap in step (g). A non-defaulting member whose primary contribution is Rs 2 crore, in a segment whose Core SGF is Rs 800 crore, could be asked for at most the lower of 2 x Rs 2 crore = Rs 4 crore and 10% x Rs 800 crore = Rs 80 crore. Its cap is Rs 4 crore.
Why NISM asks about it
Chapter 4 (Risk Management, section 4.3) covers the Core Settlement Guarantee Fund, its Minimum Required Corpus, its contributors and, in section 4.3.3, the default waterfall. Questions test the order: what is used first (the defaulter's own monies), where insurance sits, the 5% of MRC slice of CC resources, and what is left to the very end (a pro-rata haircut to pay-outs). The cap on additional contribution by non-defaulting members, with its equity/derivatives difference, is a natural numerical question.
Common exam traps
- The defaulter's monies come before insurance. Insurance is step (b), not step (a).
- Clearing corporation skin in the game comes twice before non-defaulting members: 5% of segment MRC at step (c), then its Core SGF contribution of at least 25% of MRC at step d(II).
- Penalties are used before any contributor's money inside the Core SGF.
- The additional-contribution cap is "lower of" two tests, and the percentage test is 10% for equity and debt but 20% for derivatives.
- The haircut to pay-outs is the last resort, not an early step.
- The Rs 100 crore exclusion in step (e) applies only when remaining CC resources exceed Rs 100 crore.
Where this is taught
- Series IV · Chapter 7: Clearing, Settlement and Risk Management of IRDintroduced here
- Series I · Chapter 7: Clearing, Settlement and Risk Management in ETCDintroduced here
- Series VII · Chapter 4: Risk Managementintroduced here
Related terms
- NovationThe clearing corporation stepping into the middle of every trade — becoming the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer — so that neither side carries the other's default risk.
- Minimum Required CorpusThe minimum size of a segment's Core Settlement Guarantee Fund, reset every month from the previous month's daily stress-test losses and shared among the clearing corporation, exchange and members.
- Clearing corporationThe entity that steps between every buyer and seller in the derivatives segment by novation, becoming the counterparty to both sides and guaranteeing that the trade settles.
- Settlement Guarantee FundA fund held by the clearing corporation, built from contributions by the exchange, the clearing corporation and clearing members plus a share of settlement penalties, used to complete settlement if a member defaults.
- HaircutThe percentage cut applied to the market value of collateral before it counts towards margin, so that a fall in its price does not leave the clearing corporation or broker under-covered.