All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Deferment of taxes

The advantage of the growth option: scheme income is tax-exempt and capital gains are taxed only when units are sold, so returns compound for years before any tax is paid.

In plain language

Two investors earn exactly the same return on exactly the same portfolio. One pays tax on it every year; the other pays only when he finally sells. The second ends up richer — not because he paid less tax in total, but because the tax money stayed invested and kept earning.

That is deferment of taxes. The workbook explains it in Chapter 8: since the mutual fund schemes are tax-exempt, and the capital gains are realized only when booked, one can allow the gains to run without worrying about tax on the same. This concept is known as deferment of taxes and allows one the benefit of compounding before tax.

Chapter 2 lists it among the advantages of mutual funds as tax deferral.

How it works

Step 1 — the scheme pays no tax. A mutual fund's income — interest, dividends and capital gains — is exempt, because mutual funds are constituted as trusts for the benefit of unit-holders. Section 10(23)(D) of the Income Tax Act exempts it. If the investor earned the same income directly, tax may have to be paid in the same financial year.

Step 2 — the investor chooses when tax arises. Within a scheme the options differ only in cash flow and tax:

OptionTax event while holding
IDCW payoutEach distribution is added to taxable income and taxed at the applicable slab
IDCW reinvestmentSame as payout — taxed although no cash is received
GrowthNone until units are sold; the NAV captures all gains

Step 3 — compounding on the untaxed amount. The growth investor's whole return stays in the scheme and earns returns of its own. The workbook's conclusion: the growth option works out to be more tax-efficient, and tax deferral helps investors legally build their wealth faster than paying tax on income every year.

Deferment is not exemption. When units are sold, capital gains tax applies at the rates for that fund type and holding period.

A worked example

Two investors each put Rs 10,00,000 into the same debt scheme, earning 10 percent a year before tax. Both are in the 30 percent slab, and debt-oriented funds are taxed at the slab rate on gains too — so the only difference is when tax is paid. All figures are illustrative; stamp duty is ignored.

Anu — IDCW reinvestment. Every year's gain is distributed and taxed at 30 percent, so her money effectively compounds at 7 percent.

Bharat — growth. Nothing is taxed until he redeems, then 30 percent of the whole gain.

AfterAnu (taxed yearly)Bharat: value before taxBharat: tax on redemptionBharat after tax
3 yearsRs 12,25,043Rs 13,31,000Rs 99,300Rs 12,31,700
10 yearsRs 19,67,151Rs 25,93,742Rs 4,78,123Rs 21,15,619

Same portfolio, same tax rate. Bharat is ahead by Rs 6,657 after three years and Rs 1,48,468 after ten — the value of compounding before tax.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 8.3 names the concept and concludes that the growth option is more tax-efficient; Chapter 2.1.5 lists tax deferral as an advantage of mutual funds; Chapter 8.1.2 supplies the reason the scheme itself pays nothing — Section 10(23)(D). Expect a question on which option is most tax-efficient (growth) and on why mutual fund income is exempt at scheme level (constituted as trusts for the benefit of unit-holders).

Common exam traps

  • Deferment is not exemption. Capital gains tax is paid when units are sold.
  • The mutual fund scheme pays no income tax on its interest, dividends or gains — Section 10(23)(D).
  • IDCW reinvestment is taxed like payout, so it does not defer tax.
  • The benefit is compounding before tax, which grows with the holding period.
  • Growth option investors receive no dividend whatever the fund earns — the NAV carries the whole gain.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series V-A

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it