NISM Professor

Designated persons

Also written Designated person · DP under the PIT code

The people a listed company, intermediary or fiduciary formally names as subject to its insider trading code of conduct, chosen by the access their role gives to price sensitive information.

In plain language

A listed company cannot police the trading of all 8,000 of its employees, and it is not asked to. It is asked to police the ones who can reach price sensitive information.

Designated persons is the name for that population. Under Regulation 9(4) the board of directors — or the analogous authority in an intermediary or a fiduciary — specifies them in consultation with the compliance officer, on the basis of role and function and the access that role provides to unpublished price sensitive information, in addition to seniority and professional designation.

Once named, a designated person and their immediate relatives live inside the code of conduct: the trading window, pre-clearance, the contra trade restriction, the prescribed reporting formats, and the disciplinary sanctions the code has to stipulate.

How it works

Regulation 9(4) sets a floor. The list shall include:

  1. employees of the listed company, intermediary or fiduciary designated on the basis of functional role or access to UPSI;
  2. employees of material subsidiaries of such listed companies, designated the same way;
  3. all promoters of listed companies, and promoters who are individuals or investment companies in the case of intermediaries and fiduciaries;
  4. the Chief Executive Officer and employees up to two levels below the CEO of the company, intermediary, fiduciary and its material subsidiaries — irrespective of functional role or ability to access UPSI;
  5. support staff such as IT or secretarial staff who have access to UPSI.

Regulation 9A(2)(a) closes the loop from the other end: the internal controls must ensure that all employees who have access to UPSI are identified as designated persons.

Which minimum standards apply is not uniform. A listed company adopts Schedule B; an intermediary or a fiduciary adopts Schedule C. A listed intermediary does both — Schedule B for trading in its own securities, Schedule C for trading in other securities. Fiduciaries are the professional firms assisting or advising listed companies: auditors, accountancy firms, law firms, analysts, insolvency professional entities, consultants and banks.

Who names them, and who that person answers to. Regulation 9(3) requires every listed company, intermediary and other person formulating a code of conduct to identify and designate a compliance officer to administer it. Regulation 2(c) defines that officer for the purposes of these regulations: a senior officer, designated so and reporting to the board of directors — or to the head of the organisation where there is no board — who is financially literate and capable of appreciating the legal and regulatory requirements under the regulations. "Financially literate" is itself defined: able to read and understand basic financial statements, meaning a balance sheet, a profit and loss account and a statement of cash flows. The officer is responsible for compliance with policies and procedures, maintenance of records, monitoring adherence to the rules preserving UPSI, monitoring of trades and implementation of the codes — under the overall supervision of the board of directors of the listed company, or the head of the organisation.

The schedules repeat the reporting line. Under Schedule B the compliance officer reports to the board of directors, and in particular provides reports to the Chairman of the Audit Committee, if any, or to the Chairman of the board, at a frequency the board stipulates but not less than once a year. Schedule C says the same for an intermediary or fiduciary, widened to the board of directors or head(s) of the organisation, or a committee constituted in that regard, and to the Chairman of the Audit Committee or other analogous body.

A worked example

Meridian Securities Ltd is a SEBI-registered stock broker, itself listed, with 2,400 employees. Its board, in consultation with the compliance officer, designates:

GroupCountWhy
CEO and employees up to two levels below34Regulation 9(4)(iv) — automatic, role irrelevant
Institutional dealing and research desks96Functional access to UPSI
Promoters (one individual, one investment company)2Regulation 9(4)(iii)
IT staff with access to the order management system11Regulation 9(4)(v)
Total designated persons143

The other 2,257 employees are governed by ordinary HR policy, not by the code.

The board fixes a pre-clearance threshold of Rs 10 lakh per trade. In August a research associate on the designated list buys Rs 14 lakh of a client company's shares without pre-clearance, while that scrip sits on the compliance officer's restricted list.

Two consequences follow. The trade needed pre-clearance because it crossed the threshold the board itself set. And the sanctions the code must stipulate — wage freeze, suspension, recovery, clawback — are available, with any amount collected remitted to SEBI for credit to the Investor Protection and Education Fund, not retained by Meridian. Because Meridian is an intermediary, it must also promptly inform the stock exchanges where the concerned securities are traded.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 7, section 7.2 (Code of Conduct), together with Schedules B and C. Questions come in two shapes. "Who must be included among designated persons?" — where the Regulation 9(4) floor is the answer and the CEO plus two levels below rule is the tested detail. And "which schedule applies?" — where the answer turns on whether the entity is a listed company, an intermediary or a fiduciary, and a listed intermediary is the trick option.

Section 7.3 (Role of Compliance Officer) supplies the third variety: who designates the compliance officer, what "financially literate" means, and to whom the officer reports. Read it against Chapter 3 (Introduction to Compliance), which sets out the same officer's dual reporting line to the board of directors and to SEBI — the two chapters are describing one role under different regulations, not disagreeing.

Common exam traps

  • CEO plus two levels below is automatic. Access is irrelevant for that group, so an answer excluding a general manager because he never sees UPSI is wrong.
  • The list is specified by the board in consultation with the compliance officer. Neither the compliance officer alone nor the CEO alone draws it up.
  • Employees of material subsidiaries are in scope; ordinary subsidiaries are not automatically caught.
  • Immediate relatives of designated persons are bound as well — the trading window and contra trade rules follow the household, not just the employee.
  • This is a code of conduct concept. Being designated does not make a person a connected person under the deeming list, and not being designated does not stop someone being an insider.
  • Schedule B is for listed companies and Schedule C for intermediaries and fiduciaries; for a listed intermediary the split is decided by which securities are being traded, not by which schedule is more convenient.
  • "Reports to the board" is not one answer, and the compliance officer does not have one reporting line. Under these regulations the officer reports to the board of directors of the listed company. But the compliance function carries a dual reporting line: Regulation 18A(2) of the Stock Brokers Regulations requires the compliance officer to immediately and independently report to SEBI any non-compliance observed, while Regulation 14(2) of the Intermediaries Regulations requires written reporting of material non-compliance to the intermediary or its board of directors. Chapter 3 puts both together — non-compliance is reported to the board of directors and to SEBI. Before answering, check which body a question means, because in SEBI statutes the capitalised "the Board" is SEBI, not the company's directors: in the very same Schedule B, contra-trade profits are disgorged "for remittance to the Board for credit to the Investor Protection and Education Fund administered by the Board under the Act".

Check yourself

  1. 1."When the trading window is open, trading by designated persons shall be subject to pre-clearance by the compliance officer, if the value of the proposed trades is above such thresholds as the board of directors may stipulate." True or False?

    1. a)True
    2. b)False
    Show the answer

    Answer: (a) True

    The statement reproduces clause 6 of Schedule B exactly.

    When the trading window is open, trading by designated persons shall be subject to pre-clearance by the compliance officer, if the value of the proposed trades is above such thresholds as the board of directors may stipulate.

    Two gates, not one. When the window is closed, designated persons and their immediate relatives shall not trade in securities at all. When it is open, larger trades still need clearance.

    What the officer does before approving: he shall be entitled to seek declarations to the effect that the applicant for pre-clearance is not in possession of any unpublished price sensitive information. He shall also have regard to whether any such declaration is reasonably capable of being rendered inaccurate.

    A declaration is not taken at face value — the officer must consider whether it could be untrue.

    And a clearance does not last indefinitely: the code shall specify any reasonable timeframe, which in any event shall not be more than seven trading days, within which trades that have been pre-cleared have to be executed by the designated person, failing which fresh pre-clearance would be needed.

    Seven trading days.

    Schedule C imposes the same requirement on intermediaries and fiduciaries, above thresholds set by the board of directors or head(s) of the organisation, with the compliance officer additionally maintaining a list of such securities as a "restricted list" which shall be used as the basis for approving or rejecting applications for pre-clearance.

    One exemption from pre-clearance: pre-clearance of trades shall not be required for a trade executed as per an approved trading plan, for which trading window norms shall not be applicable either.

    And after the trade, one more restriction — a contra trade may not be executed for not less than six months.

  2. 2.Which employees are designated persons irrespective of their functional role or access to UPSI?

    1. a)The Chief Executive Officer and employees up to two levels below the CEO
    2. b)Only the compliance officer
    3. c)Only the board of directors
    4. d)All employees without exception
    Show the answer

    Answer: (a) The Chief Executive Officer and employees up to two levels below the CEO

    (iv) Chief Executive Officer and employees up to two levels below Chief Executive Officer of such listed company, intermediary, fiduciary and its material subsidiaries irrespective of their functional role in the company or ability to have access to unpublished price sensitive information.

    The words "irrespective of" are what make this category distinctive. Everyone else is designated because of access; the top three tiers are designated because of seniority.

    The other four categories all turn on access or status:

    (i) Employees of such listed company, intermediary or fiduciary designated on the basis of their functional role or access to unpublished price sensitive information.

    (ii) Employees of material subsidiaries of such listed companies designated on the basis of their functional role or access.

    (iii) All promoters of listed companies and promoters who are individuals or investment companies for intermediaries or fiduciaries.

    (v) Any support staff of a listed company, intermediary or fiduciary such as IT staff or secretarial staff who have access to unpublished price sensitive information.

    Category (v) is easy to overlook. IT and secretarial staff rarely make decisions, but they see documents before anyone else does.

    Who decides: the board of directors or such other analogous authority shall in consultation with the compliance officer specify the designated persons to be covered by the code of conduct on the basis of their role and function in the organisation and the access that such role and function would provide to unpublished price sensitive information in addition to seniority and professional designation.

    Why the label matters. Designated persons and immediate relatives of designated persons are subject to the trading window, pre-clearance, the contra trade bar, and annual disclosure of relatives, material financial relationships and phone numbers.

    And Regulation 9A reinforces itall employees who have access to unpublished price sensitive information are identified as a designated person.

  3. 3.For how long may a designated person of a listed company not execute a contra trade?

    1. a)Not less than six months
    2. b)Not less than three months
    3. c)Not less than one year
    4. d)There is no restriction
    Show the answer

    Answer: (a) Not less than six months

    The code of conduct shall specify the period, which in any event shall not be less than six months, within which a designated person who is permitted to trade shall not execute a contra trade.

    Six months is a floor — the code may set a longer period, never a shorter one.

    The consequence of breach is disgorgement, not merely a penalty: should a contra trade be executed, inadvertently or otherwise, in violation of such a restriction, the profits from such trade shall be liable to be disgorged for remittance to the Board for credit to the Investor Protection and Education Fund administered by the Board under the Act.

    "Inadvertently or otherwise" — intention is irrelevant.

    One exception: this shall not be applicable for trades pursuant to the exercise of stock options.

    And relaxation is possible but reasoned: the compliance officer may be empowered to grant relaxation from strict application of such restriction for reasons to be recorded in writing provided that such relaxation does not violate these regulations.

    Schedule C sets the same six months for a designated person who is a connected person of the listed company, with a shorter period for one asset class: in case of dealing in the units of mutual funds, the code of conduct shall specify the period, which in any event shall not be less than two months.

    Six months for securities; two months for mutual fund units.

    The Kwality case shows the enforcement. The promoter and managing director executed contra trades within six months and a profit of Rs2.12 crore and did not remit it to SEBI for credit to the investor protection and education fund, a non-executive director did likewise, and several designated persons executed contra trades within six months and failed to remit the profit.

    **The compliance officer who did not act was fined Rs 2 lakh.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series III-A

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it