All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Dual Category

Structures whose underlying assets are illiquid but whose instruments are liquid — listed or redeemable with restrictions — such as REIT and InvIT units and security receipts.

In plain language

The workbook sorts investments into traditional (liquid, on-market) and alternative (illiquid, off-market or complex). Some products refuse to fit either box, and Table 1.1 gives them a third column: dual.

The definition turns on a split between the wrapper and what is inside it. The dual class could include structures that have underlying illiquid assets, but where the instruments per se may be liquid, because they are either listed on the stock exchange or redeemable through the mutual fund route with some restrictions.

So a dual-category product lets an investor reach an illiquid asset — rented property, stressed loans, infrastructure — through something that can still be sold or redeemed.

How it works

The dual column of Table 1.1

Dual-category productIlliquid underlyingLiquid instrument
Closed-ended debt fundsIlliquid assets such as real estate exposuresFund units
Security receiptsAssets of securitisation companies, SPVs, ARCsExchange traded; stable, predictable cash flow
REIT and InvIT unitsRent-yielding property; infrastructure assetsListed units offering stable cash flow and rating
Mutual funds with alternative or contrarian strategiesHigher-risk positionsMutual fund units

Why it is a borderline, not a fixed list. In 1.2.4 the workbook says that because REITs are liquid due to their listed status, they are sometimes considered either traditional assets or in the dual category. InvITs, also listed and tradable, are described as akin to traditional assets, and are preferred by low risk-taking long-term investors such as pension funds and insurance companies.

How to place a product. Ask two questions:

  1. Is the underlying asset readily convertible into cash? If yes, it is traditional.
  2. If not, is the instrument itself listed or redeemable (even with restrictions)? If yes, dual. If no, alternative.

A worked example

Illustrative figures. A family office in Kochi reviews four proposals, Rs 5 crore each:

ProposalUnderlying liquid?Instrument liquid?Class
Listed REIT unitsNo — office buildingsYes — listedDual
Direct stake in a warehouse SPVNoNo — unlistedAlternative
Nifty 50 ETFYesYesTraditional
Security receipts of an ARC, exchange tradedNo — stressed loansYesDual

It buys the REIT units and the security receipts:

Dual-category exposure = Rs 5 crore + Rs 5 crore = Rs 10 crore
Share of the four-proposal budget = 10 ÷ 20 = 50%

Six months later it needs Rs 3 crore. It sells REIT units on the exchange in a day. Had it bought the warehouse SPV stake instead, there would have been no market to sell into — the property risk is similar, the liquidity is not. That difference is the whole reason the dual column exists.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 1 (Overview of Alternative Investments) defines the dual class alongside Table 1.1 in section 1.1, and returns to it in 1.2.4 when discussing REITs and InvITs. Expect a classification question in which a REIT, a security receipt or a closed-ended real estate debt fund must be placed, and a definition question on "illiquid underlying, liquid instrument".

Common exam traps

  • Dual = illiquid underlying + liquid instrument. Liquid on both counts is traditional; illiquid on both counts is alternative.
  • "Liquid" includes redeemable through the mutual fund route with some restrictions — not only exchange-listed.
  • REITs are borderline: the workbook allows them to be seen as traditional or dual because they are listed. InvITs are called akin to traditional assets.
  • Security receipts appear in the dual column when exchange traded — issued by securitisation companies, SPVs and ARCs.
  • Mutual funds with alternative or contrarian strategies are dual, not traditional, even though they are mutual funds.

Check yourself

  1. 1.Which of the following is an example of an alternative investment?

    1. a)Investment in AAA listed bond
    2. b)Investment in Government securities
    3. c)Purchase of commercial real estate
    4. d)Investment in exchange traded futures
    Show the answer

    Answer: (c) Purchase of commercial real estate

    (This is a sample question from the NISM workbook.)

    Apply the chapter's own test — liquidity:

    Why each of the other three is traditional:

    • (a) "LISTED DEBT SECURITIES issued by both listed and unlisted companies" is a named traditional item
    • (b) Government securities are on-market and readily saleable
    • (d) ⚠️ "EXCHANGE TRADED SIMPLE DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS SUCH AS FUTURES & OPTIONS USED TO MANAGE PORTFOLIO RISK ON EQUITIES" appears explicitly in the traditional column

    Option (d) catches people who assume derivatives must be exotic. Exchange traded futures and options are traditional; it is OTC derivatives and CDOs that sit in the alternative column, because they are complex structures without a ready market.

    Commercial real estate qualifies because it is a direct, off-market holding — the alternative column includes "DIRECT INVESTMENTS IN REAL ESTATE AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPER PROJECT SPVs."

    Contrast a REIT unit, which gives real estate exposure but is listed — and is therefore "sometimes considered either TRADITIONAL ASSETS OR IN THE DUAL CATEGORY."

  2. 2.A REIT holds commercial buildings, yet its units are often classified as traditional or dual rather than alternative. Why?

    1. a)Because REITs are regulated by RBI rather than SEBI
    2. b)Because the essential test is the liquidity of the instrument, and REIT units are liquid by virtue of being listed even though the underlying assets are illiquid
    3. c)Because buildings are not considered an asset class
    4. d)Because REITs may only be held by retail investors
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) Because the essential test is the liquidity of the instrument, and REIT units are liquid by virtue of being listed even though the underlying assets are illiquid

    And the definition of the dual category makes the reasoning explicit: ⚠️ "THE DUAL CLASS COULD INCLUDE STRUCTURES THAT HAVE UNDERLYING ILLIQUID ASSETS BUT THE INSTRUMENTS PER SE MAY BE LIQUID, AS THEY ARE EITHER LISTED ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE OR ARE REDEEMABLE THROUGH THE MUTUAL FUND ROUTE WITH SOME RESTRICTIONS."

    The test is applied to the instrument you hold, not to the asset sitting behind it. A building could hardly be less liquid; a REIT unit can be sold before lunch. What the REIT structure achieves is exactly the transformation the dual category names — illiquid asset, liquid claim.

    What a REIT actually is: "SECURITIES THAT ENTITLE THE HOLDERS TO UNDERLYING CASH FLOW GENERATED FROM RENT YIELDING PROPERTIES", offering "THE ADVANTAGE OF INVESTING IN THE SECTOR WITHOUT PHYSICALLY HOLDING REAL ESTATE ASSETS."

    The same logic covers InvITs: they too are "LISTED AND TRADABLE ON THE CAPITAL MARKET, MAKING THEM AKIN TO TRADITIONAL ASSETS."

    Contrast the genuinely alternative version of the same exposure, which sits in the alternative column: "DIRECT INVESTMENTS IN REAL ESTATE AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPER PROJECT SPVs", entailing "CONSIDERABLE MARKET RISK... or ILLIQUIDITY RISK DUE TO LONG GESTATION PERIOD." Same sector, entirely different liquidity — and therefore a different classification.

    The other dual-category members follow the same pattern: closed ended debt funds with real estate exposures, exchange traded security receipts of securitisation companies, SPVs and ARCs, and mutual funds running alternative or contrarian strategies.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XIX-B

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it