All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Hedge ratio

The number of futures (or options) needed to hedge a position. For one stock with its own futures it is 1:1; for a portfolio against index futures it is portfolio value × beta ÷ contract value.

In plain language

A hedge only works if it is the right size. Too small and part of the risk is left open; too large and you have turned a hedge into a bet in the other direction. The hedge ratio answers "how many contracts?"

The workbook treats two cases:

Hedging a single stock with its own stock futures. The futures contract moves with the very stock you hold, so the hedge ratio is 1:1 — match the shares to the lot size.

Hedging a portfolio with index futures. Now the hedge instrument is different from what you hold. Your ten stocks are not the index's thirty or fifty, and your portfolio may be more or less volatile than the index. A 1:1 ratio is not appropriate. You scale by beta, the measure of how much the portfolio moves when the index moves.

In Chapter 4 the workbook also notes that an option's delta is often called the hedge ratio — a separate use of the phrase for options.

How it works

Portfolio beta is the weighted average of the stocks' betas, weights summing to 1. Beta above 1 is an aggressive portfolio; below 1, conservative.

Contract value = futures index level × contract multiplier. For simplicity, the beta of the futures index relative to the spot index is taken as one.

The workbook's cautions (Chapter 3, section 3.9):

  • A portfolio has a different beta against different indices, so the hedge ratio changes with the index used.
  • Beta is historical; the hedge assumes the past relationship continues, so actual results may differ.
  • Index futures hedge systematic risk only. Stock-specific risk is not hedged.

For options (Chapter 4, section 4.7): with a portfolio of n shares, n ÷ delta gives the number of calls to write for a delta-neutral hedge.

The formula

Single stock:  Contracts = Shares held / Lot size            (1:1)
Portfolio:     Contracts = (Vp × βp) / Vi
               Vp = portfolio value, βp = portfolio beta
               Vi = futures index level × contract multiplier
Portfolio beta βp = W1β1 + W2β2 + … + Wnβn

A worked example

1. Portfolio beta (Chapter 3). Four stocks with betas 0.5, 1.1, 1.3 and 0.9, weights 35%, 15%, 20% and 30%:

βp = 0.5×0.35 + 1.1×0.15 + 1.3×0.20 + 0.9×0.30
   = 0.175 + 0.165 + 0.260 + 0.270 = 0.87

A conservative portfolio.

2. Contracts to short (Chapter 5). Portfolio value Rs 90,00,000, beta 1.3, index futures 17,700, lot size 50.

Vi        = 17,700 × 50               = Rs 8,85,000
Contracts = (90,00,000 × 1.3) / 8,85,000
          = 1,17,00,000 / 8,85,000    = 13.22

Short 13 index futures contracts.

3. Single stock (Chapter 3). An investor holds 550 HDFC Bank shares; the futures lot is 550. Hedge ratio 1:1 → 1 contract.

Notice what beta does in example 2. Without it, the answer would be 90,00,000 / 8,85,000 = 10.17 contracts — about three contracts short of a full hedge for a portfolio that moves 1.3 times the index.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 3, section 3.9 (Uses of index futures), explains beta, portfolio beta, the 1:1 ratio for stock futures and the beta-based formula for index futures. Chapter 5, section 5.1, applies it to a Rs 90 lakh portfolio. Chapter 4, section 4.7, calls delta the hedge ratio for options. Calculation questions on the number of contracts are frequent.

Common exam traps

  • Multiply by beta; do not divide. A high-beta portfolio needs more contracts.
  • Vi is the contract value, futures level × lot size — not the index level alone.
  • 1:1 works only when the futures are on the same stock. For a portfolio against an index, it does not.
  • Round sensibly: 13.22 contracts means 13 in the workbook.
  • Beta is historical and index-specific. Change the index and the hedge ratio changes.
  • In options, "hedge ratio" means delta — keep the two uses apart.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XVI

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it