All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Mutual Will

Two testators leaving each other reciprocal benefits in their wills, valid only where the same two people are, for each other, both testator and legatee.

In plain language

A husband and wife each write a will leaving everything to the other. Individually, these are two ordinary wills. Together, the workbook gives them a name: a mutual will.

In a mutual will, the two testators confer reciprocal benefits on each other. Each has an absolute benefit, or a life interest, in the other's property. The workbook is precise about when this actually works: the executants must fulfil the role of both testator and legatee for each other. If the testator on one side and the legatee are different people, the structure is not viable as a mutual will.

How it works

Mutual will versus joint will. A joint will is made by two or more people, sharing one physical document. Indian law treats it as two separate wills, each admitted to probate individually, intended to take effect after both testators have died. A mutual will can be written as a joint will, or as two separate documents. The reciprocal-benefit structure is what defines it, not the number of physical documents.

Revocability. Under Section 62 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, a will can be revoked or altered by its maker at any time while competent to do so. A will made mutually is still, in principle, revocable by either party during their joint lifetime. The workbook does not describe a mutual will as creating a binding contract that overrides this general revocability rule; it simply describes the reciprocal-benefit arrangement while both are alive.

When it fails. The moment the persons who are testator and legatee are not the same two people on both sides, the arrangement is not a mutual will. It collapses into two ordinary, independent wills with no reciprocal structure at all.

A worked example

Mr and Mrs Iyer, married 32 years, each write a will leaving their entire estate, Rs 1,20,00,000 for him and Rs 45,00,000 for her, to the other. Each is testator of their own will and legatee under the other's, a textbook mutual will.

Now change one fact. Suppose Mr Iyer's will instead leaves his estate to his brother, while Mrs Iyer's will leaves hers to Mr Iyer. The reciprocity is broken; Mr Iyer is a testator but not, on his own will, conferring a benefit back on his wife. This is no longer a mutual will; it is simply two unrelated, independent wills that happen to have been signed around the same time.

Because both spouses can revoke their own will at any point under Section 62, if Mr Iyer later remarries and rewrites his will in favour of his new spouse, the earlier mutual arrangement with Mrs Iyer offers her no special protection. The reciprocal promise was not a binding contract.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 15, section 15.2.2 (Types of Will), covers joint and mutual wills together, distinguishing the shared-document joint will from the reciprocal-benefit mutual will, and stating exactly when a mutual will is 'not viable'. Expect a question distinguishing joint from mutual wills, and a scenario testing whether a given pair of wills qualifies as mutual.

Common exam traps

  • A joint will and a mutual will are not the same thing. Joint describes the physical document, or its treatment as two wills; mutual describes the reciprocal benefit.
  • Both parties must be testator and legatee to each other. If the beneficiary named is a third party rather than the other testator, it is not a mutual will.
  • Either party can still revoke their own will under Section 62. A mutual will is not automatically an irrevocable contract in this workbook's treatment.
  • A mutual will can be written as one joint document or as two separate ones. The physical form does not decide whether it is mutual.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series X-B

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it