All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Nominal return

The stated rate of return quoted on an investment before adjusting for inflation — as opposed to the workbook's real rate of return, which accounts for it.

In plain language

The number printed on a bank deposit receipt is not the whole story. That number is the nominal return, and inflation quietly eats into it every year.

The workbook explains this through purchasing power: over time, as the cost of goods and services rises, the ability of a rupee to buy things keeps declining. A Vada Pav that cost Rs 2 five years ago now costs Rs 7 — not because it changed, but because inflation changed what a rupee can buy.

Because of that, the workbook tells you to determine your real rate of return: the return you can actually expect once the effect of inflation is taken out of the nominal number you were quoted.

How it works

The workbook does not use the phrase "nominal return" itself, but it sets up the contrast directly: try to determine your real rate of return, or the return you can expect after factoring in the effects of inflation. The number you are quoted up front — the rate on an FD receipt, the return promised on a scheme — is that same figure before this adjustment, which is what "nominal" means here.

The workbook's own advice for protecting against this gap is to invest at a rate equal to or higher than the rate of inflation, so that the real, after-inflation return does not fall below zero. It gives no fixed inflation percentage or formula to subtract in this booklet — the Vada Pav example is illustrative of the effect, not a rate to apply.

A worked example

Kavita puts Rs 1,00,000 into a fixed deposit quoting 7% a year — that 7% is the nominal return, the number printed on her deposit receipt.

If prices in the economy rise by about 5% that year, the purchasing power her money actually gains is much closer to 2%, not 7% — roughly the workbook's real rate of return, after factoring in inflation. Her Rs 1,07,000 at maturity buys noticeably less than 7% more of the goods and services Rs 1,00,000 bought her a year earlier.

Had inflation instead run at 8% that year, her real return would have turned negative even though her nominal return stayed a positive 7% — her money grew in rupees and still lost purchasing power.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 2 (Key Concepts in personal finance) introduces inflation and the real rate of return using the Vada Pav example, immediately after explaining the time value of money. Expect a question that asks you to reason about why a positive quoted return can still leave an investor worse off in real terms.

Common exam traps

  • Nominal is what you are quoted; real is what inflation leaves you with. A question describing a rate "before inflation" is asking about the nominal return.
  • A positive nominal return can still be a negative real return, if inflation runs higher than the quoted rate.
  • The workbook does not name a specific inflation rate to subtract — treat any percentage in a nominal-versus-real question as the question's own illustrative figure, not a fact from this booklet.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series SEBI-ICE

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it