All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Option writer

Also written Writer of an option · Option seller · Seller of an option

The party who sells an option: receives the premium upfront and takes on the obligation to sell (call) or buy (put) the underlying if the buyer exercises. Gain is capped at the premium.

In plain language

Every option has two sides. The buyer pays a premium and gets a right. The writer collects that premium and takes on the matching obligation.

The buyer only exercises when it suits the buyer. So the writer's best outcome is known on day one: keep the premium when the option expires worthless. The worst outcome is whatever the buyer's gain turns out to be.

That asymmetry is the whole character of option writing. Small, likely, capped gains; larger, less likely, open-ended losses. Writers are paid for carrying that risk, which is why the workbook notes they "tend to extract higher premiums" when volatility is expected to be high.

How it works

The workbook's definitions (Chapter 16):

  • The party taking a short position, selling the option, is the seller or writer. The buyer pays the premium to the writer upfront.
  • "The writer of an option is one who receives the option premium and is thereby obliged to sell/buy the asset if the buyer of option exercises his right." A sell obligation for a call; a buy obligation for a put.
  • The writer "is legally bound to honour the contract whenever the option buyer decides to exercise".
  • Assignment is the allocation of exercised options to one or more option sellers.
  • A closing purchase reduces or eliminates a short position and is often called "covering" it. It must be in an option with the same strike and same expiry.

Views: a call writer is neutral to bearish; a put writer is neutral to bullish.

Pay-off: the writer's gain is limited to the premium; Chapter 21 says the seller "faces unlimited risk" and has "limited upside equal to the premium received". For a call the loss is indeed open-ended. For a put the loss is bounded, because the underlying cannot fall below zero: the Chapter 16 sample question (put strike Rs 245, premium Rs 49) gives a maximum loss of 245 − 49 = Rs 196.

When writers prefer to sell: when implied volatility is high, because the option price itself is high. And the delta is used to hedge a share holding by writing calls: n shares ÷ delta gives the number of calls to write for a delta-neutral position.

The formula

Short call pay-off at expiry = Premium − max(0, S − X)
Short put  pay-off at expiry = Premium − max(0, X − S)

Maximum gain (either)        = Premium
Maximum loss, short call     = unlimited
Maximum loss, short put      = X − Premium   (if S falls to zero)
Break-even, short call       = X + Premium
Break-even, short put        = X − Premium

S = underlying price at expiry, X = strike.

A worked example

The workbook's Chapter 16 call-seller table, with the index at 17,562, uses a 17,500 strike call at a premium of 185. Take the workbook's own assumed Nifty lot size of 50.

Premium received = 185 × 50            = Rs 9,250
Break-even       = 17,500 + 185         = 17,685
Index at expiryPer unitPer lot of 50
17,300 or below+185+Rs 9,250
17,600185 − 100 = +85+Rs 4,250
17,700185 − 200 = −15−Rs 750
18,000185 − 500 = −315−Rs 15,750

The gain never exceeds Rs 9,250. The loss at 18,000 is already 1.7 times the most the writer could have made, and it keeps growing with the index.

Now the put side, from the Chapter 16 sample question: write a put with strike Rs 245 at premium Rs 49. If the share collapses to zero:

Loss = (245 − 0) − 49 = Rs 196 per share

Large, but finite. That is the difference between the two kinds of writing.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 16 (Introduction to Options) defines the writer, assignment and closing transactions and gives the seller-perspective pay-off tables for calls and puts; Chapter 17 builds short straddles, short strangles and covered calls from written options; Chapter 21 (Exchange Traded Interest Rate Options) restates the buyer-versus-seller risk. Expect a maximum-loss calculation for a written put, a question on which view a call or put writer holds, and one on who carries the obligation.

Common exam traps

  • The writer has the obligation; the buyer has the right. Options reversing this are the commonest wrong answers.
  • Call writer: obligation to sell. Put writer: obligation to buy.
  • Unlimited loss is true for a short call, not a short put. Chapter 21 speaks of the seller facing unlimited risk in general terms; the Chapter 16 sample question shows a written put's maximum loss is strike minus premium.
  • Maximum gain is the premium, whatever happens to the underlying.
  • Covering a short option means buying the same strike and expiry. Buying a different option is a new position, not a close.
  • Selling deep ITM puts fetches more premium and carries more risk; deep OTM puts are less risky and pay less (Chapter 16).

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series IV

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it