All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Pledgee

The lender in a pledge or hypothecation — the party who confirms the pledgor's request through its own DP, and who is recorded as beneficial owner of the securities only on invocation.

In plain language

The lender in a demat pledge or hypothecation is the pledgee. Nothing is created until the pledgee acts: the pledgor can submit a request, but the transaction exists only once the pledgee confirms it through its own DP.

Until that confirmation, and again until any eventual invocation, the pledgee holds a claim, not ownership. The securities stay legally and beneficially with the pledgor throughout the life of a performing loan.

How it works

From Chapter 9, section 9.2.3: once the pledgor's request is entered and verified, the pledgor submits the duly stamped and signed PRF to the pledgee along with a confirmation letter, and the details are also communicated electronically to the pledgee's DP for confirmation. The pledgee's DP compares the form against the system details and either accepts or rejects the request; on rejection, the reason is recorded in the system.

A pledgee can give a standing instruction at account opening (or later) to auto-accept pledge requests in its favour — NSDL calls this a "Standing Instruction Indicator for Auto Pledge Confirmation." On confirmation, the pledgor's holding shows as pledged balance, and the Pledge Request Form must itself contain the pledgee's undertaking to give reasonable notice to the pledgor and comply with Sections 176 and 177 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, per a SEBI circular of 5 February 2026.

On invocation, once verified, the pledgee is recorded as beneficial owner of the securities under Regulation 79(8) of the SEBI (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, and the depository notifies both pledgor and pledgee of this. For a pledge (not a hypothecation), no confirmation is required from the pledgor's DP at invocation — the pledgee acts unilaterally on default.

A worked example

A bank, as pledgee, is offered 6,000 shares worth Rs 36,00,000 as collateral by a borrower. The pledge request reaches the bank's DP electronically; the bank's DP compares it against the recorded details and, satisfied, confirms the pledge. The shares now show as pledged balance in the borrower's account.

Because the bank has a standing instruction with its DP to auto-accept pledges in its favour, future pledge requests from the same category of borrower would confirm automatically, with no separate signed PRF needed each time.

If the borrower later defaults, the bank files an Invocation Request Form. On verification, the bank is recorded as the beneficial owner of the shares under Regulation 79(8) — with no confirmation needed from the borrower's DP at all, because this is a pledge, not a hypothecation.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 9 makes the pledgee's confirmation the hinge of the entire pledge procedure — the workbook's own review question asks precisely when a pledge is "complete" (on the pledgee's confirmation advice being entered, not on the pledgor's request). Expect that, plus the Regulation 79(8) beneficial-owner-on-invocation point.

Common exam traps

  • A pledge is not created until the pledgee confirms — the pledgor's request alone only produces "pledge setup balance," a pending status.
  • A pledgee can pre-authorise auto-confirmation through a standing instruction — it need not act on every request manually.
  • On invocation of a pledge, the pledgor's DP need not confirm anything — that extra confirmation step exists only for hypothecation.
  • The pledgee becomes recorded beneficial owner only on invocation, under Regulation 79(8) — not at the point of confirming the original pledge.

Check yourself

  1. 1.A pledgor submits an unpledge request after repaying his loan, and the pledgee rejects it. What happens to the securities?

    1. a)They are automatically credited to the pledgor's free balance after seven days
    2. b)They continue to remain as pledged balances in the pledgor's account
    3. c)They are transferred to the pledgee's account
    4. d)The depository releases them on the pledgor's written representation
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) They continue to remain as pledged balances in the pledgor's account

    In case of rejection by the pledgee, the securities continue to remain as pledged balances in the pledgor's account.

    This is the point of the whole confirmation architecture: the pledgor can request un-pledging or closure after the performance of the underlying agreement — request, not effect. Repaying the loan does not release anything by itself. There is no automatic timer, so option A is wrong.

    Option C confuses closure with invocation. Securities move to the pledgee only on invocation, where they are transferred from the "pledged balance" of the pledgor's beneficial owner account to the "free balance" of the pledgee's beneficial owner account.

    The pledgor is not left in the dark: the reasons for rejection are displayed in the DP system of the pledgor's DP, from a defined list including "agreement number differs from that on the agreement", "market value of pledged ISINs insufficient" and "POA not received from all holders". In CDSL those coded reasons are absent and the pledgee DP enters the reason in a remark field.

  2. 2.A pledge has been created over securities that are subject to a lock-in. The pledgor defaults while the lock-in is still running. What can the pledgee do?

    1. a)Invoke the pledge immediately, as default overrides the lock-in
    2. b)Invoke the pledge, but the securities are credited to him only after the lock-in ends
    3. c)The invocation request cannot be set up until the lock-in period is over
    4. d)The pledge itself was invalid, since locked-in securities cannot be pledged
    Show the answer

    Answer: (c) The invocation request cannot be set up until the lock-in period is over

    If the pledge is for lock-in securities, then the invocation request cannot be setup till the lock-in period is over, and locked-in securities cannot be invoked before the lock-in release date. The request cannot even be entered — so option B, which imagines the request going through with delayed delivery, is wrong.

    Option D fails at the first step. Securities — free balances or lock-in balances — held in a depository account can be pledged or hypothecated, and the creation step confirms it: securities are debited from the free or locked-in balances and credited as pledge setup balance. Lock-in is no obstacle to creating a pledge; it is an obstacle to invoking one.

    That asymmetry is the whole point of the question, and it is a genuine trap for a lender: collateral that cannot be realised when you need it is not much use, which is why lenders check the lock-in status before accepting shares.

  3. 3.The pledgee has confirmed creation of a pledge. The pledgor now asks his own DP to cancel the pledge order because he has found another lender. What is the position?

    1. a)The pledgor's DP can cancel it at any time before the closure date
    2. b)The pledgor's DP can cancel it only if both parties hold their accounts with the same DP
    3. c)The pledgor's DP cannot cancel the pledge order after the pledgee has confirmed its creation
    4. d)The pledgor's DP can cancel it unilaterally, as with a unilateral closure
    Show the answer

    Answer: (c) The pledgor's DP cannot cancel the pledge order after the pledgee has confirmed its creation

    The workbook: "The pledgor's DP cannot cancel the pledge/hypothecation order after confirmation of creation of the pledge/hypothecation by the pledgee." Once confirmed, the pledge can end only through closure (unpledge) on repayment or invocation on default.

    • A invents a cancellation window.
    • B is wrong because having the same DP changes nothing: "It remains the same irrespective of whether or not they have accounts with different DPs. Even if both have their accounts with the same DP, the procedure of receiving the pledge confirmation from the lender has to be followed."
    • D gets unilateral closure backwards. It is initiated by the pledgee, and then no action is required by the pledgor or the pledgor's DP. The pledgor has no unilateral route.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series VI

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it