All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Relinquishment

Also written Relinquishment of asset

The act of an owner voluntarily withdrawing from and abandoning their rights in a capital asset — undefined in the Income Tax Act, but treated as a "transfer" and so chargeable to capital gains tax.

In plain language

Relinquishment is one of several ways the Income Tax Act treats a change in ownership as a "transfer" for capital gains purposes, even though no sale or exchange has technically taken place.

The word itself is not defined in the Act — the workbook is explicit on this. What the workbook does say is when it happens: a relinquishment takes place when the owner withdraws himself from the property and abandons his or her rights to it.

How it works

Because relinquishment counts as a transfer under Section 2(47), any gain arising from it is chargeable to tax under the head capital gains, exactly as if the asset had been sold. The absence of a statutory definition does not exempt it — it just means the meaning has been built up through the workbook's own illustration and general usage.

Relinquishment sits alongside two neighbouring but distinct ideas in the same section: exchange of asset (Section 118 of the Transfer of Property Act — two people mutually swapping ownership of two things, neither of them being only money) and extinguishment of rights — where a person's rights in an asset are extinguished, which is also treated as a transfer, but is a different mechanism from voluntarily walking away from a right.

A worked example

The workbook's own illustration. Mr A and Mr B enter into a partnership, each contributing assets. After 2 years, Mr A retires from the firm and relinquishes his rights and interest in the partnership property in favour of Mr B.

The workbook's conclusion: this relinquishment of rights amounts to a transfer, and is chargeable to tax under the head capital gains — Mr A is taxed on the gain in his rights and interest in the property, exactly as if he had sold his share to Mr B outright, even though no conventional sale deed changed hands.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 8 (Capital Gains), section 8.4, "Transfer of Capital Asset," lists relinquishment among the events the Act treats as a transfer, using the Mr A / Mr B partnership example directly. Expect a question asking whether a described withdrawal of rights counts as a "transfer," and one distinguishing relinquishment from exchange and from extinguishment of rights.

Common exam traps

  • "Relinquishment" is not defined in the Act. A question that asks for the statutory definition is testing whether you know none exists — only the description built up through usage.
  • Relinquishment still counts as a transfer, and so is fully taxable — the absence of a formal sale does not exempt it.
  • Relinquishment, exchange and extinguishment of rights are three separate events in the same list, not three names for the same thing.
  • The Mr A / Mr B partnership example is the workbook's own — a partner retiring and giving up their interest in partnership property is the textbook illustration of relinquishment, likely to reappear in a scenario question.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series X-B

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it