Retention periods
Also written Retention periods (SEBI guidelines) · Retention of records · Record retention · Preservation of records
How long AML records must be kept: five years from the transaction for transaction records, and five years after the relationship ends or the account is closed, whichever is later, for identity records.
In plain language
An AML record is useless at the moment it is created. Its value appears years later, when an investigator needs to reconstruct who moved what, to whom, and when.
So the PMLA does not simply require records to be made — it requires them to survive. There are two clocks, and the reason students lose marks here is that they run from different events. Transaction records run five years from the transaction. Identity records run five years from the end of the relationship. A client who traded once in 2019 and closed his account in 2027 has transaction records that expire in 2024 and identity records that expire in 2032.
How it works
Section 12 of the PMLA sets both clocks:
| Record | Period | Runs from |
|---|---|---|
| Records of all transactions, maintained so as to enable reconstruction of individual transactions | Five years | The date of the transaction between the client and the reporting entity |
| Records of documents evidencing identity of clients and beneficial owners, account files and business correspondence | Five years | After the business relationship has ended or the account has been closed, whichever is later |
The SEBI guidelines repeat both and add two more:
- Records of information relating to transactions, whether attempted or executed, which are reported to the Director, FIU-IND under Rules 7 and 8 — five years from the date of the transaction
- Registration records on the DARPAN Portal of NITI Aayog for a client that is a non-profit organisation — five years after the business relationship has ended or the account has been closed, whichever is later
The override. Where the records relate to an ongoing investigation, or to transactions that have been the subject of a suspicious transaction report, they shall be retained until it is confirmed that the case has been closed. That is not five years — it is indefinite, and it is the rule most often missed.
What the records must contain. Rule 4 requires enough to permit reconstruction of the individual transaction: the nature of the transaction, the amount and currency, the date, and the parties. For the audit trail, SEBI additionally requires the beneficial owner of the account, the volume of funds flowing through it, and for selected transactions the origin of the funds, the form in which they were offered or withdrawn, the identity of the person undertaking the transaction, the destination of the funds and the form of instruction and authority.
A worked example
Deccan Securities Ltd reviews what it may destroy on 1 April 2025.
| Client | Facts | May it be destroyed? |
|---|---|---|
| Mr Bhosale | Traded Rs 4 lakh on 12 May 2019; account still open | Transaction records: yes, five years ran out on 12 May 2024. Identity records: no — the relationship has not ended |
| Ms Iyer | Account closed 30 June 2021; last trade 3 March 2021 | No to both. Transaction records run to 3 March 2026; identity records run to 30 June 2026 |
| Sunhill Traders LLP | Account closed 2 January 2019; an STR was filed on it in 2018 and the matter is still under investigation | Nothing may be destroyed. Records subject to an STR or an ongoing investigation are retained until the case is confirmed closed |
| Pragati Foundation (NPO) | Relationship ended 15 August 2022 | DARPAN registration records run to 15 August 2027 |
The arithmetic the exam wants. Ms Iyer's two clocks give 3 March 2026 and 30 June 2026 — different dates from the same client, because one runs from the transaction and the other from closure. The commonest wrong answer is to apply the later date to everything, or the earlier date to everything.
What it costs to get it wrong. The Way2Wealth Brokers order shows the shape of the consequence: FIU-IND imposed a monetary penalty of Rs 1 lakh under section 13(2)(d) together with detailed directions under sections 13(2)(a) and 13(2)(b), and required the reporting entity to return, within 30 days, a certification signed by its Designated Director and Principal Officer that the directed measures would be implemented.
Why NISM asks about it
Chapter 6 (SEBI Guidelines for AML, CFT and PF), section 6.2.9 (Retention of Records), read with section 12(3) and 12(4) of the PMLA from Chapter 2 and Rule 4 from Chapter 3. This is pure recall territory and the questions are usually arithmetic: a date, an event and a period, asking when the record may be destroyed. The "whichever is later" limb and the ongoing-investigation override are the two discriminating points.
Common exam traps
- Two clocks, two starting events. Transaction records run from the transaction; identity records, account files and business correspondence run from the end of the relationship or closure of the account, whichever is later.
- "Whichever is later" is not "whichever is earlier". A relationship can end before the account is formally closed, or the other way round; you take the later of the two.
- An STR or an ongoing investigation suspends the clock entirely. Those records are kept until the case is confirmed closed, with no fixed period.
- Attempted transactions are retained too, not just executed ones — the SEBI guidelines say whether attempted or executed.
- Records may have to be kept even longer on demand. Where an investigating authority requires it, the intermediary shall retain records such as client identification, account files and business correspondence for periods that may exceed those required under the SEBI Act, the PMLA or exchange byelaws.
- Do not confuse the retention period with the reporting deadlines — the 15th of the succeeding month, seven working days for an STR, and the 15th of the month succeeding a quarter for immovable property are a different set of numbers entirely.
Check yourself
1.According to Section 12 of the PMLA, every reporting entity is required to do which of the following?
- a)All of the above
- b)Maintain a record of all transactions
- c)Furnish to the Director information relating to such transactions
- d)Maintain details relating to the identity of its clients
Show the answer
Answer: (a) All of the above
All three appear in section 12(1).
(a) maintain a record of all transactions, in such manner as to enable it to reconstruct individual transactions
(b) furnish to the Director within such time as may be prescribed, information relating to such transactions, whether attempted or executed, the nature and value of which may be prescribed
(c) maintain record of documents evidencing identity of its clients and beneficial owners as well as account files and business correspondence relating to its clients
Note three details. Clause (a) sets a standard of reconstruct[ing] individual transactions, not merely listing them. Clause (b) covers transactions whether attempted or executed — an attempt is reportable. And clause (c) reaches beneficial owners as well as clients, plus account files and business correspondence.
Everything is confidential: every information maintained, furnished or verified, save as otherwise provided under any law for the time being in force, shall be kept confidential.
The retention periods differ in their starting point:
The records referred to in clause (a)... shall be maintained for a period of five years from the date of transaction between a client and the reporting entity.
The records referred to in clause (c)... shall be maintained for a period of five years after the business relationship between a client and the reporting entity has ended or the account has been closed, whichever is later.
And relief is possible: the Central Government may, by notification, exempt any reporting entity or class of reporting entities from any obligation under this Chapter.
"Records" is defined widely enough for electronic storage: records include the records maintained in the form of books or stored in a computer or such other form as may be prescribed.
Section 12 also anchors the Principal Officer's role — the officer is designated by a reporting entity for the purpose of Section 12 of PMLA.
Where this is taught
Free preparation for NISM Series XXIVRelated terms
- Central KYC RegistryThe Government's central digital store of KYC records for the whole financial sector, operated by CERSAI, which de-duplicates records and issues each client a unique KYC Identifier.
- Client Due DiligenceScreening and verifying a client using reliable, independent sources — identity, beneficial owner, purpose of the relationship — and then continuing to scrutinise it for as long as it lasts.
- Suspicious Transaction ReportA report a SEBI intermediary must file with FIU-IND within 7 days of concluding that a transaction or connected series of transactions is suspicious — and must never disclose to the client.
- Know Your CustomerThe identity and address check every investor must clear before a bank, broker or depository participant will open an account — mandatory under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
- Risk Based ApproachApplying each due diligence measure in proportion to the money-laundering risk a client poses — enhanced diligence for higher-risk clients, simplified for lower-risk, never simplified where suspicion exists.