All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Safety

One of the three pillars of investment — how well protected your invested money and its return are, and how likely you are to get it back when promised.

In plain language

Before asking how much an investment will earn, ask a simpler question first: will you get your money back at all? That is what safety measures.

The workbook's own words: safety means your money invested is protected and there is every possibility that on the agreed date, or maybe even before, it would be returned whenever needed. It uses a simple test — if you lend Rs 100 to someone, will it be repaid on time, and is your capital of Rs 100 safe?

Safety is one of the three pillars of investment, alongside liquidity and return. The workbook is explicit that an investment decision is influenced by all three together, not by any one of them alone.

How it works

The workbook ranks safety by comparison rather than by a fixed scale. Government bonds are considered to be effectively "risk free", because of the trust that the government will not default on repayment. Investments in debt instruments are considered to have relatively low risk, while investments in equities are considered high-risk investments, because their returns depend on the performance of individual companies and the general economic scenario.

The workbook gives no numeric safety score or rating scale for this pillar in this booklet — it teaches the concept through comparison (government bonds versus debt versus equity) rather than through a formula. It does, separately, give a concrete example of safety failing entirely: a Ponzi scheme promises returns with little or no risk, which the workbook itself flags as the clearest warning sign that safety is being faked rather than delivered.

A worked example

Priya is deciding where to put Rs 2,00,000. A government bond offering 6.5% a year is, in the workbook's own terms, effectively risk-free — she can be reasonably confident her Rs 2,00,000 will come back with that interest, on the agreed date.

A friend instead offers her a private scheme promising 24% a year, guaranteed, with little explanation of where the return comes from. The unusually high, guaranteed-sounding return, with no clear source, is exactly the profile the workbook warns investors to be suspicious of — a scheme faking safety rather than actually offering it.

Priya puts her money in the government bond and a bank fixed deposit instead, choosing safety and liquidity over the unverified promise of a much higher return.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 3 (Financial Planning) names safety as one of the three pillars of investment, alongside liquidity and return, and Chapter 11 (Caution against Ponzi Schemes) separately warns that an unusually high, low-risk-sounding promise is a red flag rather than genuine safety. Expect a question asking which pillar a described scenario is testing, and a separate question linking "guaranteed high returns" to Ponzi-scheme warning signs.

Common exam traps

  • Safety is not the same as liquidity. A government bond can be very safe and still take time to sell; safety is about getting your money back, not about getting it back quickly.
  • Safety is not the same as return. The safest instruments in the workbook's own ranking — government bonds — are not described as the highest-returning ones.
  • "Guaranteed high returns" is the workbook's own red flag for a Ponzi scheme, not a genuine description of a safe investment.
  • The workbook gives no numeric safety rating — treat safety comparisons (government bonds versus debt versus equity) as relative, not scored.

Check yourself

  1. 1.According to Step 2 of the five-step approach, a medium-term goal has a time horizon of:

    1. a)A few months to one year
    2. b)One year to eight years
    3. c)Three years to five years
    4. d)Eight years or more
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) One year to eight years

    The chapter sets two boundaries. "Short-term goals are typically financial requirements that are expected to arise in time period ranging from A FEW MONTHS TO ONE YEAR. Medium-term goals may have a time horizon of ONE YEAR TO EIGHT YEARS. Goals like buying a property, starting your own venture, getting enrolled in a professional course, etc. can be medium-term financial goals. Long-term goals may have a time horizon of EIGHT YEARS OR MORE for example child's marriage, retirement planning." The examinable line is eight years, and candidates who half-remember it usually guess five. Note also which examples sit where — buying a property is medium-term in this booklet, while a child's marriage and retirement are long-term. The classification matters because it comes before product selection: an eight-month goal needs safety and liquidity, a fourteen-year goal needs growth.

  2. 2.What are the three pillars of investment?

    1. a)Risk, return and taxation
    2. b)Safety, liquidity and return
    3. c)Equity, debt and gold
    4. d)Savings, investment and insurance
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) Safety, liquidity and return

    "The investment decision by an individual is influenced by SAFETY, LIQUIDITY AND RETURN. They are called the THREE PILLARS OF INVESTMENT." The chapter defines each. Safety is "how well protected the PRINCIPAL AND RETURN on the investment is" — note that it covers the return as well as the principal. Liquidity is "the degree of ease with which you can encash or liquidate your investment AT FAIR VALUE" — the fair-value condition is part of the definition, so a forced sale at a distress price is not liquidity. Return may be "in the form of income, appreciation of capital invested or both." The chapter's own illustration runs through the first two: "if you lend ₹100 to someone, will it be repaid on time?" is safety; "how soon will you get your money back if you need it immediately?" is liquidity.

  3. 3.A family needs ₹90,000 for a holiday eight months away. Which pillars must this money not compromise, and what follows for the product choice?

    1. a)Return, so the money should go into equity to maximise growth
    2. b)Safety and liquidity, since the amount must be there in full on a known date — so a savings account, short fixed deposit or recurring deposit is appropriate
    3. c)None, since eight months is too short for any pillar to matter
    4. d)Safety alone, so a long-term fixed deposit with a lock-in is appropriate
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) Safety and liquidity, since the amount must be there in full on a known date — so a savings account, short fixed deposit or recurring deposit is appropriate

    Eight months is a short-term goal — the chapter's range is "a few months to one year". Over that horizon return is almost irrelevant (a few thousand rupees either way) while safety and liquidity are absolute: the money must be intact and available on the date. The chapter defines safety as protection of "the principal and return" and liquidity as encashing "at fair value", both of which point to a deposit rather than a market-linked product. Option (a) is the classic error, and its cost is concrete: equities are "considered as HIGH RISK investments as their returns are subject to performance of individual companies and general economic scenario", and a 20% fall in month six turns ₹90,000 into ₹72,000 with no time to recover — the holiday is cancelled, not postponed. Option (d) fails on the second pillar: a lock-in past the eight-month date defeats the purpose. Note that none of this required a view on the market; the goal, date and amount settled it, which is why classification is Step 2 and product selection is Step 4.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series SEBI-ICE

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it