NISM Professor

Specified persons

The four categories of people — an NPO's founder, a substantial contributor, a trustee or manager, or a trustee's relative — whose benefit from NPO income or property costs the NPO its tax exemption.

In plain language

An NPO gets tax exemption because its money is meant for its charitable objects, not for the people who run it. Specified persons is the workbook's name for the insiders that rule protects against.

If an NPO's income or property, in whole or in part, is applied for the benefit of a specified person, the NPO loses its exemption. The workbook lists four categories of specified person: the NPO's author or founder; a substantial contributor to the NPO; a trustee or manager of the NPO; and a relative of a trustee.

The idea is simple. An NPO cannot claim tax-free status while quietly channelling benefits back to the very people who set it up or control it.

How it works

The four categories (Chapter 10, section 10.3):

CategoryWho it covers
Author or founderThe person who created the NPO
Substantial contributorAnyone who has given ₹50,000 or more to the NPO by the end of the financial year
Trustee or managerAnyone who runs the NPO
RelativeA relative of any trustee

The consequence. This is one of four listed ways an NPO loses its exemption under Chapter 10. The other three are: converting into a form ineligible for registration; merging with an entity that does not share similar objects and is not itself registered; and, on dissolution, failing to transfer all assets to another registered NPO within 12 months of the month of dissolution.

Why it matters beyond tax. The same idea, that insiders should not benefit from the organisation's money, echoes the SSE's own disclosure rules, which require an NPO to report related party transactions as part of its annual governance disclosures.

A worked example

Illustrative NPO; figures are made up.

Karuna Seva Trust runs a school-feeding programme. Its books show two transactions in one year.

It pays ₹35,000 in market-rate rent to a landlord unconnected to the trust, for a warehouse. This is an ordinary business expense, not a benefit to a specified person.

It also pays ₹2,00,000 in "consultancy fees" to the brother-in-law of its founding trustee, for work that was never actually performed. This second payment benefits a relative of a trustee, a specified person under category four. Because the trust's income was applied for that person's benefit, Karuna Seva Trust risks losing its tax exemption for the year, regardless of how small a share of its total budget the ₹2,00,000 represents.

Had the same ₹2,00,000 gone to an unrelated vendor for genuine consultancy work, no specified-person issue would arise at all.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 10 (Taxation), section 10.3, lists specified persons as one of the ways an NPO loses its Section 11 tax exemption, alongside conversion, merger and dissolution failures. Expect a question asking which of four listed people counts as a specified person, or testing the ₹50,000 substantial-contributor threshold specifically.

Common exam traps

  • Four categories, not three or five: founder, substantial contributor, trustee/manager, relative of a trustee.
  • ₹50,000 is the substantial-contributor threshold, measured by the end of the financial year, not a one-time gift test at the moment of donation.
  • Losing exemption over specified persons is one of four triggers in the workbook's list. The others are conversion, an ineligible merger, and a failed asset transfer on dissolution.
  • Do not confuse this with anonymous donation: specified persons is about who receives NPO money; anonymous donation is about who gave it.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XXIII

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it