All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Sub-asset class

A division within an asset class whose members share distinct features — within equity, by industry or market capitalisation; within debt, by credit risk or tenor.

In plain language

An asset class is a group of investments that share risk and return features and react in a similar way to economic events — equity, debt, cash, real estate, commodities. But "equity" is not one thing. A large IT exporter and a small real estate developer are both equity, and they do not behave alike.

Sub-asset classes are the next level down: groups inside an asset class that have features specific to that group.

The workbook is clear about what qualifies. A sub-asset class is defined by an objective characteristic — the industry, the company's size, the issuer's credit risk, the security's tenor. Loose descriptions such as "low-risk stocks" or "volatile stocks" are not sub-asset classes.

How it works

Within equity, the workbook gives two bases:

BasisExamplesWhy it matters
IndustryPharma, IT, auto, FMCGTechnology revenues are sensitive to currency moves because exports are large; interest-rate-sensitive sectors such as real estate benefit when rates fall
Market capitalisationLarge, mid, smallLarge-caps typically show greater stability in earnings and are less volatile than mid- and small-caps

Within debt, sub-categories are based on:

BasisExamples
Credit riskGovernment securities versus corporate securities
TenorShort term versus long term

Why an adviser uses them. The workbook says diversifying across asset classes and sub-asset classes is an efficient way to manage portfolio risk, because even within an asset class the sub-categories respond differently. Its example: when interest rates rise, short-term debt earns higher coupon income, while long-term debt takes a hit on total returns as its value falls. A retirement distribution portfolio built across asset classes and sub-asset classes helps generate income, protect against inflation and provide liquidity at the same time.

A worked example

Illustrative figures. A 58-year-old has Rs 30 lakh earmarked for retirement, split Rs 12 lakh equity / Rs 18 lakh debt. Looking only at asset classes, the portfolio seems balanced. Looking at sub-asset classes shows where the risk actually sits.

Asset classSub-asset classAmount
EquityLarge-capRs 3,00,000
EquitySmall-capRs 9,00,000
DebtGovernment securities, long tenorRs 15,00,000
DebtShort-term depositsRs 3,00,000

Two concentrations appear that the 40:60 split hides:

Small-cap share of equity   = 9,00,000 ÷ 12,00,000 = 75%
Long-tenor share of debt    = 15,00,000 ÷ 18,00,000 = 83%

Now suppose interest rates rise and — purely for illustration — long-tenor bond values fall 4 percent:

Mark-to-market loss = 4% × 15,00,000 = Rs 60,000

The short-term deposits, meanwhile, roll over at the higher rates. Re-weighting within debt towards shorter tenors, and within equity towards large-caps, lowers risk without changing the 40:60 asset allocation at all — which is exactly the diversification across sub-asset classes the workbook recommends as retirement approaches.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 2, section 2.3 (Asset Class and Sub-Asset Classes) and section 2.4 define the sub-categories within equity and debt; one of Chapter 2's sample questions asks which option is a sub-asset class under equity, where "large cap equity" is the only option that fits the definition, against "low risk stocks", "volatile stocks" and "total return stocks". Chapter 3, section 3.4.2, and Chapter 5, section 5.6.1, apply the idea to diversification and to building a distribution portfolio.

Common exam traps

  • Descriptions are not classes. "Low risk stocks", "volatile stocks" and "total return stocks" sit beside "large cap equity" in the workbook's own sample question; only the last is defined by industry or market capitalisation.
  • Equity is sub-divided by industry or market capitalisation; debt by credit risk or tenor. Mixing the bases — "long-tenor equity" — is a sign an option is wrong.
  • Rising rates hurt long tenors and help short tenors. The workbook's example of sub-categories responding differently is exactly this pair.
  • Large-caps are typically less volatile than mid- and small-caps because of greater earnings stability — a tendency, not a guarantee.
  • Sub-asset class diversification is additional to asset allocation, not a substitute for it.

Check yourself

  1. 1.Which of the following is a sub-asset class under equity?

    1. a)Large cap Equity
    2. b)Total return stocks
    3. c)Low risk stocks
    4. d)Volatile stocks
    Show the answer

    Answer: (a) Large cap Equity

    This is the workbook sample question. Sub-categories within equity are formed on two bases only: the industry to which a group of companies belong (pharma, IT, auto, FMCG) or the size of the company based on its market capitalisation — large, mid or small cap.

    Large cap equity fits the second basis exactly.

    "Total return stocks", "low risk stocks" and "volatile stocks" are loose descriptions rather than recognised classifications — they are not how sub-asset classes are defined.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XVII

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it