All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Upstreaming

Also written Upstreaming of clients' funds

The SEBI framework requiring stock brokers and clearing members to transfer all client funds to the clearing corporation by end of day, as cash, a lien on a bank FD, or units of a Mutual Fund Overnight Scheme.

In plain language

For years, client money sat with the broker between the time it was received and the time it was actually needed for a trade. That money resting with the broker, even briefly, is exactly what a dishonest or failing broker can misuse.

Upstreaming closes that gap. Every rupee of client funds a broker or clearing member receives must go up to the clearing corporation by the end of the day — none of it may simply sit with the broker overnight.

How it works

The workbook (Chapter 4, section 4.1.7) sets out the framework: no client funds shall be retained by stock brokers or clearing members on an end-of-day (EoD) basis.

Client funds may be upstreamed to the clearing corporation in only three forms:

  1. Cash;
  2. a lien on a bank fixed deposit receipt (FDR) created out of client funds, subject to specified conditions; or
  3. a pledge of units of Mutual Fund Overnight Schemes (MFOS) created out of client funds — and these MFOS must themselves deploy only into risk-free government bond overnight repo markets and overnight Tri-party Repo (TREPS).

Bank instruments the client itself gives as collateral — client FDRs and bank guarantees — cannot be upstreamed to the clearing corporation, and are not eligible as collateral in any segment of the securities market at all.

The framework does not apply to bank-CMs, including custodians that are banks, and does not apply to a broker's or clearing member's own proprietary funds in any segment, or to a broker's proprietary funds deposited with its own clearing member as a client.

A worked example

A broker collects Rs 8 crore in client funds during the day — some as margin, some as pay-in for settlement.

At end of day, the broker cannot simply hold that Rs 8 crore in its own bank account overnight. It must upstream all of it to the clearing corporation, for example as:

FormAmount (Rs)
Cash transferred to CC3,00,00,000
Lien created on a bank FDR (out of client funds)2,50,00,000
Units of an MFOS pledged (out of client funds)2,50,00,000
Total upstreamed8,00,00,000

Suppose a client separately deposits an FDR worth Rs 20 lakh, issued in the client's own name, as collateral with the broker. That FDR cannot be upstreamed to the clearing corporation and, under this framework, is not accepted as collateral at all — the broker must find another acceptable form of margin for that client.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 4 (Risk Management, section 4.1.7, Enhanced Supervision of Stock Brokers, point 5) introduces upstreaming as a safeguard for client funds, right after the client-level collateral segregation framework. Expect it tested on which three forms upstreamed funds may take, and the fact that client-owned FDRs and bank guarantees are excluded from acceptable collateral entirely, not merely from upstreaming.

Common exam traps

  • No client funds may remain with the broker at end of day — the rule is EoD retention, not a longer window.
  • Only cash, a lien on a broker-created FDR out of client funds, or MFOS units qualify for upstreaming — a client's own FDR or bank guarantee does not.
  • MFOS funds must go only into government bond overnight repo or TREPS — not any overnight scheme a broker chooses.
  • Bank-CMs, including bank custodians, and proprietary funds are excluded from this framework — it targets client funds at non-bank brokers and clearing members.
  • Do not confuse upstreaming (moving client funds to the CC) with the margin pledge mechanism (moving client securities collateral up a pledge chain) — they run in parallel for funds and securities respectively.

Check yourself

  1. 1.Under SEBI's upstreaming framework, which of the following may a stock broker upstream to the clearing corporation?

    1. a)A bank guarantee provided by the client as collateral
    2. b)A fixed deposit receipt provided by the client as collateral
    3. c)A pledge of units of a Mutual Fund Overnight Scheme created out of client funds
    4. d)Any liquid security held in the client's demat account
    Show the answer

    Answer: (c) A pledge of units of a Mutual Fund Overnight Scheme created out of client funds

    Client funds may be upstreamed only in the form of cash, a lien on an FDR created out of client funds (subject to conditions), or a pledge of units of Mutual Fund Overnight Schemes (MFOS) created out of client funds. Those MFOS must deploy funds only into risk-free government bond overnight repo markets and overnight TREPS.

    Options A and B are directly excluded, and the exclusion is stronger than candidates expect: the bank instruments provided by clients as collateral — client FDRs and BGs — cannot be upstreamed to CCs, and they shall be ineligible to be accepted as collateral in any segment of the securities market. Note the distinction: an FDR created by the broker out of client funds may carry a lien; a client's own FDR handed over as collateral may not be used at all.

    The framework's core requirement is that no clients' funds shall be retained by stock brokers or clearing members on an End of Day basis. It does not apply to bank-CMs (including bank custodians) or to proprietary funds.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series VII

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it