All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Warrant

An option issued by a company giving the holder the right, not the obligation, to subscribe to its shares at a fixed price on or after a set date. SEBI requires 25 per cent of the price upfront.

In plain language

A share warrant lets an investor lock in today the price at which they may buy new shares from the company later.

It works like a stock option, with two differences the workbook draws out: a warrant is issued by the company (not by the exchange), and it has a longer life than the 1 to 3 months of an exchange-traded stock option. And unlike most options, the holder pays a real chunk upfront: 25 per cent of the total consideration — which is lost if the warrant is not exercised.

How it works

The workbook's mechanics (section 2.6.4):

  1. The company issues warrants at a predetermined exercise price, exercisable on or after a predetermined date.
  2. Under SEBI rules, investors pay 25 per cent of the consideration upfront, when the warrants are issued.
  3. On the exercise date, investors who exercise are allotted equity shares as per the prescribed formula and pay the balance.
  4. Investors who do not exercise forfeit what they paid.

Who benefits and why. For the company, warrants make sense when the exercise price is above the current share price: if prospects are expected to improve, the company captures part of the future price rise instead of issuing shares at today's valuation. For the investor, warrants lock in a price for a future purchase by paying only 25 per cent now, with the upside if the share price rises.

Chapter 3 adds that warrants — along with fully and partly convertible debentures — can be issued by a listed company through preferential allotment, which needs a shareholders' resolution and SEBI-formula pricing.

A worked example

The workbook's example. Shares of ABC Ltd trade at Rs 180. On 31 August 20Y1 the company issues 4,00,000 warrants at an issue price of Rs 220 to institutional investors, exercisable on 31 August 20Y2.

Total consideration = 4,00,000 × Rs 220 = Rs 8.80 crore
Upfront (25%)       = Rs 2.20 crore
Balance on exercise = Rs 6.60 crore

One year later — illustrative prices:

Share price on exercise dateDecisionOutcome for the investors
Rs 300Exercise: pay Rs 6.60 crore moreShares worth 4 lakh × 300 = Rs 12 crore for a total outlay of Rs 8.80 crore — a gain of Rs 3.20 crore
Rs 200Do not exercise — shares are cheaper in the marketForfeit Rs 2.20 crore

For ABC Ltd, the first row means issuing shares at Rs 220 when it could only have got Rs 180 a year earlier. The second row means it keeps Rs 2.20 crore without issuing any shares.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 2 (Securities: Types, Features and Concepts of Asset Allocation and Investing), section 2.6.4, among hybrid instruments; Chapter 3 (Primary Markets), section 3.17, under preferential allotment. The numbers to hold are the 25 per cent upfront payment and the forfeiture rule; the concept to hold is the difference between a warrant and an exchange-traded stock option.

Common exam traps

  • 25 per cent upfront, balance on exercise; not exercised means forfeited, not refunded.
  • Warrants are issued by the company; stock options by the exchange (as the workbook puts it), and warrants have a longer life.
  • Exercising a warrant creates new shares, so it dilutes existing shareholders — unlike buying an exchange-traded call.
  • A right, not an obligation. The holder chooses whether to exercise.
  • An inconsistency in the workbook's example: the warrants are issued "to institutional investors", but the next sentence says the balance is paid "if the promoters decide to exercise their warrants". Read it as the warrant holders — the same investors who paid the Rs 2.20 crore.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series IX

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it