NISM Professor

Catch up clause

Also written Catch-up rate · Catch up

The waterfall step that pays the manager a set share — often 100% — of the profit left after investors receive their capital and hurdle, until the manager reaches its agreed share of total profit.

In plain language

A manager entitled to "20% of the profits" is not, in a fund with a hurdle, entitled to 20% of the profits. The hurdle is paid to investors first, out of the same pot, and what is left over is usually much smaller than the headline profit. Take 20% of the leftovers and the manager ends up with far less than 20% of the whole.

The catch-up clause closes that gap. After investors get their capital and their hurdle, the next slice of money goes to the manager — at the catch-up rate — until the manager has been brought up to the share of total profit it was promised. Only then does the ordinary split resume.

It is, in the workbook's own framing, a clause the manager wants and the investors should read carefully.

How it works

The catch-up is step five of a six-step deal-by-deal distribution waterfall for a close-ended Category I or Category II AIF:

PriorityWhat is paid
1Expenses, taxes and statutory payments chargeable to the fund
2Reserves the manager elects to retain for future liabilities, as disclosed in the PPM
3Management fees and other costs chargeable to the fund
4Net proceeds — first to repay corpus contributions of each class pro rata, then the preferred return, in whatever inter-se priority the PPM sets between classes
5Catch-up, so the manager is equated to its agreed share of the scheme's total return
6Residual, split in the agreed ratio between investors and the carry holders

If there is no catch-up clause in the contribution agreement, step 5 is simply skipped and the residual is shared straight after step 4.

The catch-up rate is what varies. At 100%, every rupee of residual goes to the manager until the target share is reached. At 40%, only 40 paise in the rupee does, and the rest continues to the investors alongside. Managers prefer a high rate; the higher it is, the greater the risk that investors receive a reduced share of the additional return — or, when profits above the hurdle are thin, none of it.

The formula

Hurdle return (compounded)  = Committed capital × [(1 + hurdle)^n − 1]

Residual profit             = Total profit − Hurdle return

Manager's target share      = Incentive rate × Total profit

Catch-up paid               = min( Catch-up rate × Residual profit ,
                                   Manager's target share )

A worked example

XYZ Fund, launched 1 April 2022. Committed capital Rs 50 crore, tenure 3 years, net asset value at the end of Year 3 Rs 70 crore, hurdle 10%, incentive fee 20% of total profits.

Start with the three numbers everything else hangs on:

CalculationAmount
Total profit70 − 50Rs 20.00 crore
Manager's pre-determined share20% × 20Rs 4.00 crore
Hurdle return over 3 years50 × (1.10)³ − 50Rs 16.55 crore
Residual profit20.00 − 16.55Rs 3.45 crore

(a) No catch-up clause. Investors take capital plus hurdle, Rs 66.55 crore. The Rs 3.45 crore residual is split 20:80.

Amount
Manager — 20% × 3.45Rs 0.69 crore
Investors — 66.55 + (80% × 3.45)Rs 69.31 crore
TotalRs 70.00 crore

(b) Catch-up rate of 100%. Investors still take Rs 66.55 crore. The manager then receives 100% of the residual until it reaches its Rs 4 crore target — but the residual is only Rs 3.45 crore, so the manager takes all of it and is still Rs 55 lakh short.

Amount
ManagerRs 3.45 crore
InvestorsRs 66.55 crore
TotalRs 70.00 crore

The manager's take goes from Rs 69 lakh to Rs 3.45 crore — five times over — on a fund whose performance did not change by a single rupee. The difference is one clause in the contribution agreement.

Note the compounding: the hurdle return is Rs 16.55 crore, not Rs 15 crore. A simple-interest hurdle would have left Rs 5 crore of residual instead of Rs 3.45 crore and changed every figure below it.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 6 (Fee Structure of Alternative Investment Funds), section 6.3.1, with Table 6.1 giving the six-step waterfall and Example 6.5 giving the arithmetic above. The chapter's learning objectives name "Concepts of High Watermark and Catch-up" explicitly. Chapter 7 (Fund Performance and Benchmarking of AIFs) then runs a 25% catch-up through a full twelve-step case study.

Expect to be handed committed capital, tenure, terminal NAV, hurdle and incentive rate, and asked what the manager receives with and without a catch-up. The compounded hurdle is the step most answers get wrong.

Common exam traps

  • The catch-up is not the carry. It is the step that brings the manager up to the carry. The carry is the residual share that follows it.
  • A 100% catch-up does not mean the manager takes everything. It stops the moment the manager reaches its agreed share of total profit — Rs 4 crore in the example.
  • When residual profit is thin, a 100% catch-up can leave investors with capital plus hurdle and nothing more. That is not a malfunction; it is the clause working as drafted.
  • No catch-up clause means step 5 is skipped, not that the manager gets nothing. It still takes its agreed percentage of the residual.
  • The hurdle compounds. Rs 50 crore at 10% for three years is Rs 16.55 crore of hurdle return, not Rs 15 crore.
  • Catch-up and clawback pull in opposite directions: one accelerates money to the manager, the other pulls it back when later deals disappoint. A deal-by-deal waterfall usually carries both.
  • The catch-up sits after management fees and reserves in the waterfall, not before them.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XIX-D

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it