NISM Professor

Net Asset Value

Also written NAV · Net Asset Value (NAV) · Net asset value per unit · NPS · Net Asset Value (NPS)

The net assets of a mutual fund scheme divided by the number of units outstanding — what one unit of the scheme is worth on a given day, after every liability except the unitholders' own.

In plain language

A scheme owns a portfolio. Value that portfolio at today's market prices, add anything the scheme is owed, subtract everything it owes to people other than its own unitholders, and you have the net assets. Divide by the number of units in issue and you have the NAV.

That is the price at which you buy in and, less any exit load, the price at which you get out. It is not a share price and it carries no information about whether the scheme is cheap — a scheme at an NAV of Rs 12 is not better value than one at Rs 480. The NAV only tells you what your units are worth.

Two accounting rules make the number honest. Securities are marked to market, so appreciation counts even though nothing has been sold. And income and expenses are taken on the accrual principle, so a scheme cannot flatter its NAV by sitting on an unpaid bill.

How it works

Take the workbook's own scheme. Investors bought 20 crore units at Rs 10, mobilising Rs 200 crore. Rs 140 crore went into equities and appreciated 10 per cent; Rs 60 crore sat in bank deposits and money market instruments. The scheme received Rs 8 crore of interest and dividend, paid Rs 4 crore of expenses, and owes a further Rs 1 crore.

Net assets are therefore Rs 200 crore of unit capital, plus Rs 3 crore of profit (8 − 4 − 1), plus Rs 14 crore of unrealised appreciation = Rs 217 crore. Across 20 crore units that is Rs 10.85 per unit.

Notice what the Rs 1 crore payable did. It has not been paid, but it has already been deducted. That is the accrual principle, and it is the single most tested line in the calculation.

How far the number is carried is also prescribed: 4 decimal places for index funds, liquid funds and other debt funds, and at least 2 decimal places for equity and balanced funds.

The formula

NAV = Unit-holders' funds in the scheme (net assets)
      ÷ Number of outstanding units

The same thing read off the balance sheet instead:

NAV = (Total assets − Liabilities other than to unitholders)
      ÷ Number of outstanding units

And the profit that feeds it:

+ Interest income   + Dividend income   + Realised capital gains
+ Valuation gains   − Realised capital losses
− Valuation losses  − Scheme expenses

A worked example

A diversified equity scheme reports, at the close of 31 March:

ParticularsRs crore
Market value of equity holdings150.00
Market value of bonds held67.00
Money market instruments2.36
Dividend accrued but not received1.09
Interest accrued but not received2.68
Total assets223.13
Less: fees payable0.36
Net assets222.77
Units outstanding1.90 crore
NAV = 222.77 ÷ 1.90 = Rs 117.25 per unit

Now price a transaction off it. Entry load is banned, so the sale price is the NAV: an investor putting in Rs 25,000 at an NAV of Rs 43.21 receives 25,000 ÷ 43.21 = 578.570 units.

On the way out it is different. At an NAV of Rs 11.00 with a 1 per cent exit load, the re-purchase price is Rs 11.00 − Rs 0.11 = Rs 10.89. The Rs 0.11 does not go to the AMC — exit load is credited straight back to the scheme.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 7 (Net Asset Value, Total Expense Ratio and Pricing of Units) is built around this calculation, and the chapter's own sample question hands you the Rs 200 crore scheme and asks for NAV per unit. Expect at least one arithmetic question where an accrued expense or accrued income is dangled to see whether you apply the accrual principle, plus a conceptual question on why marking to market matters and how many decimal places each scheme type must report.

Common exam traps

  • Accrued expenses are deducted even though unpaid, and accrued income is added even though unreceived. The workbook says it explicitly: a scheme cannot show better profits by delaying payments.
  • A low NAV is not cheap. NAV per unit says nothing about valuation; it depends entirely on the scheme's launch date and history.
  • Sale price = NAV. Entry load has been banned, so there is no longer any mark-up on the way in. Exit load is the only load left, and it reduces the re-purchase price.
  • An IDCW payout reduces the NAV on the record date. Receiving a dividend from a scheme is not additional return.
  • Unrealised appreciation raises NAV but is not distributable. Valuation gains are ignored when computing distributable reserves.
  • Decimals matter in a multiple-choice question: 4 places for index, liquid and other debt schemes; at least 2 for equity and balanced.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series II-B

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it