Closure date
The date entered on a Pledge Request Form indicating the intended duration of a pledge or hypothecation, after which the pledgee's DP must confirm creation of the pledge, except in NSDL where this rule does not apply.
In plain language
A pledge is not meant to last forever without confirmation. The pledgor, when creating it, states roughly how long the arrangement is expected to run.
That expected duration is entered on the Pledge Request Form as the closure date. It is not a hard, automatic expiry that cancels the pledge on its own. Instead, it sets a deadline for the pledgee's DP to confirm the pledge before that date passes.
How it works
When the pledgor submits the Pledge Request Form, it includes the closure date of the pledge/hypothecation, which the workbook describes as "indicative of the duration of pledge/hypothecation", alongside the securities details, the agreement number and the pledgee's details.
Only 1 closure date is entered per Pledge Request Form, and the pledgee's DP must confirm creation of the pledge before that date passes — with the specific carve-out that this confirmation deadline is not applicable in the case of NSDL.
The closure date reappears at the un-pledge stage too: one of the listed reasons a pledgee may reject a closure request is "Un-pledge / Closure date not accepted", meaning the date entered on the closure instruction does not match what the pledgee's own records or agreement expect.
A worked example
Mr Iyer pledges 600 shares worth Rs 2,88,000, at Rs 480 each, on 1 April, entering a closure date of 30 June on the Pledge Request Form to indicate he expects the loan, and the pledge, to run for roughly three months.
If this pledge is being processed through a depository where the confirmation deadline applies, the pledgee's DP must confirm creation of the pledge before 30 June — if it fails to do so, the pledge request lapses unconfirmed. Had Mr Iyer's pledge instead been processed through NSDL, this deadline simply would not bind the pledgee's DP at all, since NSDL is expressly carved out of the rule.
When Mr Iyer later repays the loan and submits a closure request quoting a different closure date than the one recorded on the original pledge, the pledgee's DP can reject the closure specifically on the ground of "closure date not accepted".
Why NISM asks about it
Chapter 9, section 9.2.2, introduces the closure date as a field on the Pledge Request Form, and section 9.2.3's discussion of pledge confirmation ties it directly to the pledgee DP's confirmation deadline, with the explicit NSDL exception. Section 9.2.4's rejection-reasons list then repeats it as a specific ground for rejecting an un-pledge request.
Expect a question on what the closure date represents (the indicative duration of the pledge, used as a confirmation deadline) and on the NSDL carve-out — the confirmation deadline tied to the closure date does not apply there.
Common exam traps
- The closure date is "indicative", not an automatic self-cancelling expiry — its main legal effect is as a deadline for the pledgee's DP to confirm the pledge.
- The confirmation-deadline rule tied to the closure date does not apply in NSDL — a detail the workbook states explicitly and that examiners like to test.
- A mismatched closure date is a specific, named ground for rejecting a closure/un-pledge request, distinct from a mismatched agreement number, which is a separate rejection ground on the same list.
- Do not confuse closure date with execution date, which is the date a specific instruction is to be carried out, not the expected overall duration of the pledge.
Check yourself
1.For how long must a DP maintain copies of Pledge Request Forms, Unpledge Request Forms and Invocation Request Forms?
- a)One year
- b)Three years
- c)A minimum period of 5 years
- d)Permanently, with no minimum prescribed
Show the answer
Answer: (c) A minimum period of 5 years
The DP shall maintain copies of all Pledge Request Forms (PRF), Unpledge Request Forms (URF) and Invocation Request Forms (IRF) for a minimum period of 5 years, or any such period informed by SEBI/NSDL/CDSL from time to time.
Note that it is a minimum — option D is wrong not because permanent retention would be improper, but because a period is prescribed.
This sits in the same checklist as three other DP duties worth memorising together: the instruction form must be submitted in duplicate, the pledgor DP and pledgee DP must each create at least two users to implement the maker-checker feature, and the request for confirmation of pledge must be given before the closure date mentioned in the instruction form — not applicable in the case of NSDL.
2.According to the DP's checklist for processing a pledge / hypothecation request, which of the following must the DP ensure?
- a)The instruction form is submitted in duplicate, and the pledgor DP and pledgee DP each create at least two users to implement the maker-checker feature
- b)The instruction form is submitted in triplicate, one copy going to SEBI
- c)A single user may enter and verify the request, provided the form is signed by all holders
- d)Pledge forms are kept for a minimum of 8 years
Show the answer
Answer: (a) The instruction form is submitted in duplicate, and the pledgor DP and pledgee DP each create at least two users to implement the maker-checker feature
Box 9.1 lists: "Ensure that the instruction form is submitted in duplicate" and "Pledgor DP and Pledgee DP each shall create at least two users to implement the Maker-checker feature. Ensure that all compulsory fields in the instruction form are entered."
- B is wrong: the form is in duplicate, and nothing goes to SEBI.
- C defeats the purpose of maker-checker. One user enters (maker) and another verifies (checker). The invocation procedure shows this too: the DP enters (maker) the invocation request details ... and verifies (checker) the details.
- D has the wrong period. The DP must maintain copies of all PRF, URF and IRF for a minimum period of 5 years or any such period that SEBI / NSDL / CDSL may inform.
The checklist also requires that, except in NSDL, the request for confirmation of pledge is given before the closure date mentioned in the instruction form.
Where this is taught
Free preparation for NISM Series VIRelated terms
- Agreement numberThe optional identifier a pledgor quotes across multiple pledge instructions drawn under a single loan agreement, letting the DP link related pledges to one underlying contract with a lender.
- PledgeA charge created over demat securities in favour of a lender who may appropriate them unilaterally on default — created by book entry under section 12 of the Depositories Act, not by handing over anything.
- Execution dateThe date on which a depository instruction is to take effect: a DIS debit waits till the end of that day for balance and then fails; for allotments and corporate actions, the day credits are made.
- Pledge sequence numberThe unique number the DP system generates for each pledge or hypothecation request, identifying that transaction for confirmation, closure and invocation even when many pledges exist between the same parties.