NISM Professor

Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance

Also written CPPI · Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance (CPPI)

A rebalancing strategy that keeps a multiple of the cushion — portfolio value minus a protected floor — in risky assets, and the rest in risk-free assets.

In plain language

CPPI tries to give an investor two things at once: upside from risky assets such as equities and downside protection from risk-free assets such as government bonds.

It works with three numbers:

  • Floor — the value below which the portfolio should not fall. It is the present value of the capital to be protected.
  • Cushion (gap) — portfolio value minus floor. This is the money you can afford to put at risk.
  • Multiplier (m) — a fixed constant that sets how many times the cushion goes into risky assets. It defines leverage. In practice multipliers are 3 to 5.

The name comes from the constant rule linking the risky allocation to the floor.

How it works

The workbook's example. ₹100 must be protected at the end of a 3-year product. Its present value — the floor — is taken as a round ₹90. Cushion = ₹10. Multiplier = 5.

  • Risky assets: 5 × (100 − 90) = ₹50
  • Risk-free assets: 100 − 50 = ₹50

If the risky assets fall to ₹40, the portfolio is worth ₹50 + ₹40 = ₹90 — exactly the floor. Any further fall threatens the capital protection. So before setting the multiplier, the manager must work out how far the risky asset could fall in the worst case before there is time to rebalance. The higher the multiple, the higher the upside — and the higher the risk of breaching the floor.

The exposure to risky assets must be rebalanced as values change, which is why the workbook calls CPPI an actively managed rebalancing strategy.

The formula

Floor            = Protected amount ÷ (1 + r)^n
Cushion          = Portfolio value − Floor
Risky investment = m × Cushion
Risk-free        = Portfolio value − Risky investment

A worked example

The workbook's Chapter 21 question. An investor gives a fund manager ₹200 lakh for 5 years and insists on no erosion of that capital. The risk-free rate is 8%; the firm limits the multiplier to 2.

Floor     = 200 ÷ (1.08)^5 = ₹136.11 lakh
Cushion   = 200 − 136.11   = ₹63.89 lakh
Risky     = 2 × 63.89      = ₹127.78 lakh
Risk-free = 200 − 127.78   = ₹72.22 lakh

Illustrative extension — why CPPI buys high and sells low. Holding the floor at ₹136.11 lakh and the risk-free leg unchanged for simplicity:

Equities +10%Equities −10%
Risky assets₹140.56 lakh₹115.00 lakh
Portfolio value₹212.78 lakh₹187.22 lakh
New cushion₹76.67 lakh₹51.11 lakh
Target risky (2 × cushion)₹153.34 lakh₹102.22 lakh
ActionBuy ₹12.78 lakh of equitySell ₹12.78 lakh of equity

The rule adds to equities after they rise and cuts after they fall — the opposite of a constant mix strategy.

Another Chapter 21 question: portfolio ₹150 crore, floor ₹100 crore, multiplier 3 → risky exposure 3 × 50 = ₹150 crore, the whole portfolio.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 21 (Portfolio Rebalancing), section 21.6, defines CPPI, the floor, cushion and multiplier, and works the ₹100 / ₹90 / m = 5 example. Two Chapter 21 questions compute the risky exposure directly (₹150 crore; ₹127.78 lakh and ₹72.22 lakh). Expect those computations and a question on the practical range of the multiplier.

Common exam traps

  • The floor is a present value, not the protected amount itself. ₹200 lakh protected over 5 years at 8% gives a floor of ₹136.11 lakh.
  • Multiply the cushion, not the portfolio value. m × (portfolio − floor).
  • Multipliers in practice: 3 to 5.
  • Higher m = more upside and more risk of breaching the floor. The workbook's example breaches at a risky-asset value of ₹40.
  • CPPI is active rebalancing; buy and hold is passive. The workbook's sample question on "no limit on the upside" and a portfolio that becomes a function of risky assets is describing buy and hold, not CPPI.
  • CPPI buys after rises and sells after falls; constant mix does the opposite.

Check yourself

  1. 1.A CPPI portfolio is worth ₹100 with a floor of ₹90 and a multiplier of 5. How much is invested in risky assets, and to what value can they fall before the portfolio touches the floor?

    1. a)₹50 in risky assets; they can fall to ₹40
    2. b)₹10 in risky assets; they can fall to zero
    3. c)₹50 in risky assets; they can fall to ₹10
    4. d)₹90 in risky assets; they can fall to ₹80
    Show the answer

    Answer: (a) ₹50 in risky assets; they can fall to ₹40

    Cushion = 100 − 90 = ₹10. Risky = 5 × 10 = ₹50; risk-free = ₹50.

    The portfolio touches ₹90 when risky assets fall to ₹40 (₹50 + ₹40 = ₹90).

    Option B ignores the multiplier. Option C confuses the cushion with the remaining risky value. Option D invests the floor in risky assets — the opposite of the floor's purpose.

  2. 2.A manager is deciding whether to raise the CPPI multiplier from 3 to 5. Which statement reflects the workbook's guidance?

    1. a)A higher multiplier raises expected upside and also the risk of hitting the floor, so worst-case falls should be studied first
    2. b)A higher multiplier always improves capital protection
    3. c)The multiplier should be raised whenever the risk-free rate rises
    4. d)The multiplier has no effect on the risky asset exposure
    Show the answer

    Answer: (a) A higher multiplier raises expected upside and also the risk of hitting the floor, so worst-case falls should be studied first

    The workbook: "Higher the multiple used, higher is the expected upside potential but so is the risk of hitting the capital protection. Hence ... the worst case scenarios are calculated before setting the multiplier." Multipliers in practice are 3–5.

    Option B is backwards. Option C links the multiplier to a factor the workbook never mentions. Option D contradicts the formula: risky exposure = m × cushion.

  3. 3.Under which strategy does the portfolio value become a function of the performance of risky assets, with no limit on the upside potential?

    1. a)Buy and hold
    2. b)CPPI
    3. c)Constant mix
    4. d)All of the above
    Show the answer

    Answer: (a) Buy and hold

    The workbook says this of buy and hold: some money sits in safe assets for a floor, the rest in risky assets, and "the portfolio value becomes a function of the performance of risky assets and there would be no limit on the upside potential".

    Constant mix trims winners back to target, which restrains the upside. CPPI actively rebalances against a floor. "All of the above" is therefore wrong.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XXI-B

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it