All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Cost of carry

Also written Carrying cost · Cost of carry (financing cost)

The cost of holding an asset until a future date — financing interest plus storage, less any income it pays. It links spot to futures: fair futures price = spot + cost of carry − inflows.

In plain language

You can get a share on a future date in two ways. Buy a futures contract today. Or buy the share in the cash market today and carry it until that date.

Carrying it is not free. You have to pay for the money you used — interest. For a commodity you also pay storage and insurance. Against that, the asset may pay you something while you hold it — a dividend on a share, interest on a bond.

Cost of carry = what it costs to hold the asset − what the asset pays you while you hold it.

For equity derivatives, the workbook puts it simply: carrying cost is the interest paid to finance the purchase less the dividend earned.

That number is the bridge between the spot price and the futures price. If both routes deliver the same share on the same date, they should cost the same — so the futures price should equal the spot price plus the cost of carry. The workbook adds a realistic note: cost of carry may be different for different participants, because they borrow at different rates.

How it works

The cost of carry model — also called the no-arbitrage model — assumes that in an efficient market arbitrage opportunities cannot persist, so the futures price settles at the fair price.

Its important assumptions (Chapter 3, section 3.7): the underlying is available in abundance in the cash market; demand and supply are not seasonal; holding the asset is easy and feasible; the asset can be sold short; and there are no transaction costs, no taxes and no margin requirements.

Where those fail, the model weakens. Seasonal commodities, assets that cannot be stored or sold short, and situations where convenience yield dominates can make futures trade at a discount that reverse arbitrage cannot correct. Because margins are ignored, the workbook says the model is more suitable for pricing forwards than futures.

Basis links it to the calendar. The difference in basis between a one-month and a two-month futures contract should essentially equal the cost of carrying the asset between the first and second month.

The formula

Fair futures price = Spot price + Cost of carry − Inflows

Discrete:    F = S × (1 + r − q)^T
Continuous:  F = S × e^((r − q) × T)

S = spot price, r = cost of carry (financing rate), q = income yield, T = time in years

A worked example

1. A single share. ABC Ltd trades at Rs 100. The buyer borrows Rs 100 at 6% p.a. and holds for one year. The company pays a 200% dividend on Rs 1 face value, i.e. Rs 2.

Interest paid      = 6% × 100 = Rs 6
Dividend received  = Rs 2
Net cost of carry  = 6 − 2   = Rs 4
Break-even futures = 100 + 4 = Rs 104

2. An index, three months. Index at 17,500, financing cost 12%, index return 4% p.a., 90 days to expiry.

Discrete:   17,500 × (1 + 0.12 − 0.04)^(90/365) = 17,835.26
Continuous: 17,500 × e^((0.12 − 0.04) × 90/365) = 17,848.63

The workbook says that if index futures trade above 17,848.63, one can buy the index stocks and sell futures to lock in the difference — ignoring transaction costs, taxes and margins.

3. Gold. Spot Rs 62,130 per 10 g; financing, storage and insurance for three months Rs 100. Fair three-month price Rs 62,230. If three-month futures trade at Rs 62,280, buying spot and selling futures earns Rs 50 per 10 g before costs.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 3, section 3.4, defines cost of carry with the ABC Ltd example; section 3.7 builds the cost of carry model, its assumptions, the dividend-adjusted formula with the 17,500 index example, and convenience yield. Chapter 5, section 5.1, applies it to cash-and-carry, reverse cash-and-carry and calendar spread arbitrage. Expect a fair-price calculation and an assumptions question.

Common exam traps

  • Dividends reduce the cost of carry. Fair futures price = spot + carry − inflows, not + inflows.
  • Discrete and continuous compounding give different answers — 17,835.26 and 17,848.63 in the workbook's own example. Use the method the question specifies.
  • The model ignores transaction costs, taxes and margins. Those create no-arbitrage bounds around the fair price.
  • The cost of carry model is also called the no-arbitrage model — not the expectations model, which is a different pricing approach.
  • The workbook says the model is better suited to forwards than futures, because margins are ignored.
  • Convenience yield mainly arises in commodities, not in financial assets such as equities.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series IV

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it