All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Fair value

Also written Theoretical futures price · Fair value of a futures contract · Fair value (of a derivative)

The theoretical futures price — spot plus the cost of carrying the commodity to expiry — at which a buyer is indifferent between buying today and buying forward.

In plain language

A futures price is not a forecast. Most of it is arithmetic.

If you need a commodity in four months you can buy it now and carry it, or buy the future. Fair value is the futures price that makes those two routes cost exactly the same. Above it, buying spot and storing is cheaper. Below it, buying the future is cheaper.

That is why the workbook calls it the price that is fair to both the buyer and the seller of the contract: at fair value neither side has a free lunch, and there is no arbitrage to take.

How it works

The simple additive form is Fair value = Spot price + Cost of carry, and cost of carry is finance cost plus storage plus insurance over the holding period.

Where the money cost is compounded rather than applied simply, the workbook gives three versions and expects you to know which to use:

  • annual compounding — F = S x (1 + r)^n
  • m times a year — F = S x (1 + r/m)^(m x n), with m = 2 for semi-annual, 4 for quarterly, 12 for monthly
  • continuous (daily) compounding — F = S x e^(r x n), with e = 2.71828

The continuous form is the one used when no storage cost is involved — it prices the futures contract purely as money invested at r for n years.

What sits between fair value and the traded price is convenience yield, which pulls the futures price down by Y.

The formula

Fair value = Spot price + Cost of carry

Annual compounding     F = S x (1 + r) ^ n
m-times compounding    F = S x (1 + r / m) ^ (m x n)
Continuous compounding F = S x e ^ (r x n)

S : spot price      r : cost of financing, per annum
n : years to expiry m : compounding frequency per year

A worked example

Three of the workbook's own valuations, side by side.

1. Simple carry, with storage. Spot Rs 2,500, holding period 90 days, interest 6% p.a., storage 1% p.a.

Finance cost = 2,500 x 0.06 x (90/365) = Rs 36.98
Storage      = 2,500 x 0.01 x (90/365) = Rs  6.16
Cost of carry                          = Rs 43.14
Fair value   = 2,500 + 43.14           = Rs 2,543.14

2. Simple carry on gold. Spot Rs 1,20,000 per 10 grams, cost of carry 12% p.a., four months:

F = 1,20,000 + (1,20,000 x 12% x 4/12) = 1,20,000 + 4,800 = Rs 1,24,800

3. The same four months, compounded. Spot Rs 50,000 per 10 grams, financing 12% p.a.

CompoundingWorkingFair value
Monthly (m = 12)50,000 x (1.01)^4 = 50,000 x 1.040604Rs 52,030
Continuous50,000 x e^0.04 = 50,000 x 1.04081Rs 52,040

Ten rupees per 10 grams separates them — Rs 1,000 on a one-kilogram gold contract, purely from the compounding convention.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 3 (Commodity Futures), section 3.5, which is the most calculation-heavy section in the paper. The chapter's own sample question — spot gold Rs 50,000 per 10 grams, cost of carry 12% per annum, three-month fair value — answers Rs 51,500, straight from S + S x r x n. Expect one or two arithmetic questions, plus a conceptual one on what a buyer should do when the spot-futures difference is larger or smaller than the cost of carry.

Common exam traps

  • Convert the tenor to years before using n. Four months is 4/12, ninety days is 90/365. The workbook uses 365 days, not 360.
  • Simple carry and compounded carry give different answers — Rs 52,000 against Rs 52,030 against Rs 52,040 on the same gold. Read which the question asks for.
  • m is the compounding frequency, not the number of periods. Monthly compounding for four months is m = 12 and n = 4/12, giving the exponent 4.
  • The continuous form assumes no storage cost. Do not use S x e^(r x n) on a commodity where the question hands you a warehousing charge.
  • Fair value is theoretical. The traded futures price differs from it, and the gap is where convenience yield and arbitrage live.
  • If the spot-futures difference is greater than the cost of carry the buyer is better off buying spot and storing; if less, better off buying the future. Candidates routinely flip this.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series I

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it