All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Cut-off time

Also written Cut-off timing · Cut off timing · Applicable NAV cut-off

The SEBI-prescribed clock time that, read together with the time stamp on the request, decides which day's NAV a mutual fund transaction is priced at.

In plain language

When an investor hands in a purchase or redemption at an official point of acceptance during the day, nobody yet knows the price. The NAV is computed after the markets close.

The cut-off time is how the industry resolves that, fairly and identically for everyone. A machine stamps the moment the request arrived; SEBI's table then says which day's closing NAV that moment earns. It removes discretion completely — which is the point, because without it an investor who saw the market fall at 3.30 pm could still buy at the morning's price.

For the registrar it is the single most consequential field on a transaction, and the reason the time stamping machine is locked and its serial numbers reconciled every morning.

How it works

The applicable NAV depends on four things: the day of the transaction, the time of the transaction, the type of scheme, and the availability of clear funds for utilisation by the mutual fund.

SchemeTransactionCut-offApplicable NAV
Equity and debt (except liquid)Purchases and switch-ins3.00 pmIrrespective of receipt time, closing NAV of the day funds are available for utilisation
Liquid fundsPurchases and switch-ins1.30 pmUp to cut-off with funds available before cut-off: closing NAV of the day immediately preceding receipt
Equity and debt (other than liquid)Redemptions and switch-outs3.00 pmUp to cut-off: same day's closing NAV. After: next business day
Liquid fundsRedemptions and switch-outs3.00 pmUp to cut-off: closing NAV of the day immediately preceding the next business day
Overnight fundsRepurchase and redemption3.00 pm, or 7.00 pm if received onlineUp to cut-off: closing NAV of day immediately preceding the next business day

A business day excludes any day on which the money markets are closed or otherwise not accessible. Liquid schemes nevertheless declare a NAV every calendar day.

Cut-off timings do not apply to NFOs, international schemes, or transactions in mutual fund units done on a recognised stock exchange. For electronic transactions the AMC or RTA server is the official point of acceptance, and the time the request reaches that server is what counts.

A worked example

Take a week in which Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday are business days and Sunday, Tuesday and Saturday are not.

Purchase of an equity fund, Rs 3,00,000, applied on Monday. Funds are realised on Wednesday at 2 pm. For equity and debt purchases the receipt time is irrelevant — what matters is when clear funds were available. So Wednesday's NAV applies. At a Wednesday closing NAV of Rs 148.6230:

StepAmount
ApplicationRs 3,00,000.00
Stamp duty at 0.005%Rs 15.00
Net investableRs 2,99,985.00
Units at Rs 148.62302,018.429

Had the bank credited the money on Monday at 2 pm and Monday's NAV been Rs 147.10, the same rupees would have bought 2,039.33 units — about 21 units more. Two days of float, twenty-one units.

Purchase of a liquid fund, applied Monday. Funds realised by 1 pm Monday, before the 1.30 pm cut-off, gets Sunday's NAV. Realised by 3 pm Monday — after the cut-off, same day — gets Tuesday's NAV. Realised at 10 am Wednesday gets Tuesday's NAV again.

Redemption from the equity fund on Monday. Before cut-off: Monday's NAV. After cut-off: not Tuesday, which is not a business day, but Wednesday's NAV.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 11 (Operational Concepts of Mutual Funds) devotes section 11.6 and Table 11.1 to this, and the worked week above is the workbook's own illustration. Chapter 6 introduces the cut-off as the reason investors route transactions through an ISC. Questions are almost always of the form "application submitted on day X at time Y, funds realised at time Z — which NAV applies?", plus a standing favourite on why time stamping exists at all. The answer to that one is: to determine the applicable NAV.

Common exam traps

  • Liquid fund purchases cut off at 1.30 pm, not 3.00 pm — but liquid fund redemptions cut off at 3.00 pm. Two different clocks in the same scheme.
  • For equity and debt purchases the receipt time is not decisive. The closing NAV of the day the funds are available for utilisation applies, whatever time the form arrived.
  • "Clear funds" means without availing any credit facility, intra-day or otherwise. An overdraft-funded credit does not count.
  • After cut-off means the next business day, not the next calendar day. In the worked week, a Monday post-cut-off equity redemption prices at Wednesday because Tuesday is not a business day.
  • NFOs, international schemes and exchange-platform transactions are outside the table entirely.
  • A distributor's office is not an official point of acceptance and cannot time stamp. A bunch of forms delivered to an ISC is stamped individually, and each is priced on its own stamp.
  • Overnight funds have a 7.00 pm cut-off for online requests — the only extended timing in the table.

Check yourself

  1. 1.Ms. Lata Iyer submits a redemption request at a location that the fund house has specified as an Official Point of Acceptance (OPA), which is not an RTA branch. How is her request treated?

    1. a)It is invalid until forwarded to an Investor Service Centre and re-stamped there
    2. b)It is treated as received only when it reaches the AMC's head office
    3. c)It is deemed to have been submitted to the fund house or RTA for processing
    4. d)It is treated as a non-financial request and processed without reference to NAV
    Show the answer

    Answer: (c) It is deemed to have been submitted to the fund house or RTA for processing

    In addition to the ISC, which are usually managed by an RTA, a fund house may specify other locations as Official Point of Acceptance (OPA). Any transactions received at these locations are deemed to have been submitted to the fund house or RTA for processing.

    Deemed submission is the whole point — the timing of receipt at the OPA counts, which matters because as per SEBI guidelines, there is a cut-off time by when the investment has to be made to be eligible for that day's NAV.

    Why the others are wrong.

    • Options A and B would defeat the purpose of an OPA and could push her request past the cut-off.
    • Option D: a redemption is a financial transaction. Non-financial transactions are things like a change in bank details, change in contact details or address, or change in bank mandate, signature update.

    What ISCs/OPAs do: among other things, accepting all investor transactions such as purchase, redemption, switch etc. and accepting requests for non-financial transactions.

  2. 2.Mr. Deepak Menon invests in several schemes of different fund houses and transacts often. Why does the workbook describe the RTA as useful to such an investor?

    1. a)Because, with SEBI's cut-off time for that day's NAV, RTAs act as a single window through their Investor Service Centres where transactions relating to various mutual funds are carried out
    2. b)Because RTAs may accept transactions after the cut-off time at that day's NAV
    3. c)Because RTAs guarantee the NAV at which his transactions will be processed
    4. d)Because RTAs are the only channel through which mutual fund transactions can be made
    Show the answer

    Answer: (a) Because, with SEBI's cut-off time for that day's NAV, RTAs act as a single window through their Investor Service Centres where transactions relating to various mutual funds are carried out

    Investors may invest in multiple schemes offered by various fund houses and they further perform transactions (purchases/ redemptions) on a continuous basis. As per SEBI guidelines, there is a cut-off time by when the investment has to be made to be eligible for that day's NAV. So, to make multiple investments, an investor avails the services of RTAs to conduct all his transactions. RTAs act as a single window system to investors where all the work and transaction related to various mutual funds are carried out at the ease of the investor through various Investor Service Centres.

    Why the others are wrong.

    • Option B turns the cut-off rule upside down. The cut-off is the reason a convenient single window matters; the RTA cannot override it.
    • Option C: NAV can move up or down, depending upon whether the value of the portfolio has moved up or down — nobody guarantees it.
    • Option D: other channels exist — an OPA specified by the fund house, stock exchange platforms, MF Utility and distributors' portals (Chapter 9).

    Note the industry fact: the two leading mutual fund RTAs are CAMS and KFintech, and they provide services to all fund houses — which is what makes a single window possible.

  3. 3.Which of these is not a financial transaction processed at an ISC — purchase of units, redemption of units, switch transactions, or change of bank details?

    1. a)All four are financial transactions
    2. b)Change of bank details — it is a non-financial transaction, along with contact or address changes and signature updates, while purchase, redemption and switch are financial
    3. c)Switch transactions, since no money enters or leaves
    4. d)Redemption, since it takes money out
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) Change of bank details — it is a non-financial transaction, along with contact or address changes and signature updates, while purchase, redemption and switch are financial

    The chapter draws the line twice.

    First in describing why RTAs are needed: every day a large number of transactions, like buying, selling or switching units are done by mutual fund investors. Some of the transactions are financial transactions, while others are non-financial in nature like a change in bank details, change in contact details or address etc.

    Buying, selling, switching — financial. Bank, contact, address changes — non-financial.

    Second in the ISC's task list: it accepts all investor transactions such as purchase, redemption, switch etc., and separately requests for non-financial transactions such as change in bank mandate, signature update etc.

    Two distinct lines in the same list, which is exactly what the question tests.

    Option C misunderstands a switch. Units of one scheme are redeemed and units of another purchased; both legs are priced against NAV, so it is unmistakably financial even though no money reaches the investor's bank.

    Option D is right that redemption takes money out, but that makes it financial, not non-financial.

    Why the classification matters. A financial transaction is priced: as per SEBI guidelines, there is a cut-off time by when the investment has to be made to be eligible for that day's NAV. A change of bank mandate has no NAV consequence at all — it merely updates a record.

    Both must be recorded, though. RTAs record and maintain data, both financial and non-financial, either in physical or in electronic form, and the RTA exists to help investors in processing of both financial and non-financial transactions.

    Units 14 and 15 of this syllabus are built on the same division — financial transactions in one, non-financial in the other.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series II-B

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it