Cyber Security Risk
Also written Cyber risk · CSCRF · Cyber Security and Cyber Resilience Framework · Cyber security risk (AIF compliance)
The risk that an AIF's or its service providers' systems are breached, corrupted or disrupted — governed by SEBI's Cyber Security and Cyber Resilience Framework, which all AIFs had to comply with by 31 August 2025.
In plain language
An AIF handles large amounts of electronic information. It processes, stores and sends it. This includes the fund's transaction data. It also includes personally identifiable information about its investors, meaning details that show who they are. The fund's service providers hold such data too. Funds now use more technology and artificial intelligence. So funds and their service providers may face information security risks from cyber-attacks.
The workbook lists what these attacks look like. Attackers may steal or corrupt data kept online or in digital form. They may attack websites so that they stop serving users (denial-of-service). They may release confidential information without permission. Or they may disrupt the fund's operations.
The workbook is also honest about the limits of any defence. AIFs should have proper internal procedures and systems. But such procedures cannot provide absolute security. It may even be hard to spot the methods used to break in.
How it works
The baseline obligations. All securities market intermediaries are required to store their data within Indian geographical boundaries and to have adequate controls and checks as per CERT-In. Any incident must be reported to the sector regulator and the central government within 6 hours.
The framework. SEBI's Cyber Security and Cyber Resilience Framework (CSCRF) follows a graded approach, classifying regulated entities into five categories: Market Infrastructure Institutions, Qualified REs, Mid-size REs, Small-size REs and Self-certification REs. The category is decided at the beginning of the financial year on the previous year's data, and the entity stays in that category for the whole year whatever happens to the parameters; the reporting authority validates it at the time of compliance submission. All AIFs were required to comply by 31 August 2025.
Categorisation is done at Manager level, not fund level — and if the manager of an AIF also manages VCFs, the corpus of those VCF schemes is clubbed in:
| Criterion | Qualified REs | Mid-size REs | Small-size REs | Self-certification REs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sum of corpus of all AIFs, VCFs and their schemes managed by a Manager | N/A | Rs 10,000 crore and above | More than Rs 3,000 crore and less than Rs 10,000 crore | Rs 3,000 crore and below |
Managers classified as self-certification REs with a client base of fewer than 100 are exempted from the mandatory Market-SOC (M-SOC) requirement — a shared security operations centre designed for smaller entities, cheaper than building a full SOC from scratch.
One more classification matters for the exam. Cyber security risk sits in the workbook's list of risks that are not measurable, alongside macro-economic, legal and regulatory, operational and country-specific risk. No ratio in Chapter 9 captures it.
A worked example
Bhima Asset Managers runs three AIF schemes and one legacy VCF scheme:
| Vehicle | Corpus |
|---|---|
| Bhima Credit Fund I | Rs 4,200 crore |
| Bhima Growth Fund II | Rs 3,100 crore |
| Bhima Long-Short Fund (Cat III) | Rs 1,500 crore |
| Bhima VCF Scheme A | Rs 600 crore |
| Clubbed at Manager level | Rs 9,400 crore |
At Rs 9,400 crore Bhima is a Small-size RE — more than Rs 3,000 crore, less than Rs 10,000 crore — for the whole financial year.
It closes a new scheme of Rs 700 crore in November, taking the clubbed corpus to Rs 10,100 crore. Nothing changes this year: the category was fixed at the start of the financial year and stays fixed. From the next financial year, Bhima is a Mid-size RE, with the heavier standards that follow.
In February, a service provider's network is compromised and investor KYC files for 310 investors are exposed.
Incident detected Thursday, 09:40
Report to sector regulator and
central government due by Thursday, 15:40 (within 6 hours)
Bhima is not exempt from the M-SOC requirement either — that exemption needs both self-certification status and fewer than 100 clients, and Bhima fails both tests. A single scheme closing at Rs 700 crore, taken alone, looks like a commercial decision; through the CSCRF it is a compliance-category decision as well.
Why NISM asks about it
Chapter 9 section 9.5 lists cyber security risk among the types of risk in AIFs and gives the 6-hour reporting rule and the data localisation requirement; Chapter 11 section 11.11 carries the CSCRF, the five categories, the corpus thresholds, the manager-level clubbing and the 31 August 2025 date. Expect a threshold-to-category question and a 'within how many hours' question.
Common exam traps
- Categorisation is at Manager level, clubbing every AIF and VCF scheme that manager runs — not per fund and not per scheme.
- Once fixed at the start of the financial year, the category holds for the year, however the corpus moves.
- For AIFs and VCFs the Qualified RE row is N/A. The top band that can apply is Mid-size, at Rs 10,000 crore and above.
- 6 hours is the incident reporting window, to the sector regulator and the central government; data must be stored inside India per CERT-In.
- The M-SOC exemption needs both conditions — self-certification RE status and a client base below 100.
- Cyber security risk is in the not-measurable list. No Chapter 9 metric quantifies it, which is why the answer is controls and a framework rather than a ratio.
Where this is taught
Free preparation for NISM Series XIX-CRelated terms
- Alternative Investment FundA privately pooled investment vehicle registered with SEBI that raises money from select Indian or foreign investors under a defined investment policy — never from the public at large.
- CustodianThe SEBI-registered entity that holds a fund's securities in accounts of its own and settles its trades, so the assets sit somewhere other than with the manager who decides what to buy.
- Operational riskThe risk of loss from fraud, inadequate documentation, improper execution or similar internal failures — one of the named risks of derivatives trading, distinct from market, credit, liquidity and legal risk.
- Business Continuity PlanThe plan a Category III AIF and its key service providers must have to keep operating through disruptions such as system failure or the loss of key personnel — no specific figure is given.
- Investor Due DiligenceThe investigation an investor runs on an AIF and its manager before committing capital — the process of investigation and evaluation into the details of a potential investment.
- M-SOCA Security Operations Centre built for the cyber security needs of smaller market intermediaries — cheaper and more accessible than building a full SOC, and mandatory for portfolio managers except the smallest.
- Two-factor authenticationThe requirement that online mutual fund subscriptions and redemptions be authenticated by two factors, one of them an OTP sent to the email or phone registered with the AMC — signature does the job offline.
- Market Infrastructure InstitutionsThe institutions that form the plumbing of the securities market — stock exchanges, depositories and clearing corporations, and under SEBI's cyber framework also KRAs and QRTAs.
- Technical glitchA malfunction in a stock broker's electronic trading or risk systems during market hours that stops, slows or distorts functions like log-in or order placement for five minutes or more.
- Regulatory sandboxA SEBI framework letting registered market participants live-test FinTech innovations with a limited set of customers, for a limited period, under the regulator's supervision.
- Cyber resilienceAn organisation's ability to prepare for and respond to a cyber-attack, keep functioning during it and recover from it — the second half of SEBI's Cyber Security and Cyber Resilience Framework.