NISM Professor

Assets under Management

Also written AUM · Assets Under Management (AUM) · Scheme size · Corpus

The total value of the money a scheme or a fund house manages — the current NAV multiplied by units outstanding — and the base on which the expense ratio is charged.

In plain language

AUM is the size of the pool. For a scheme it is everything investors have put in, plus or minus what the investments have done since, minus what has been paid back out.

It is also the number the industry is ranked on. The relative size of one AMC against another is assessed by AUM, and the growth of the industry is quoted in it.

How it works

Three things move a scheme's AUM, and only three:

  1. Performance. The portfolio rises or falls, so the NAV rises or falls, and AUM moves with it even if not one unit is bought or sold.
  2. Inflows. Fresh subscriptions after the NFO create units and add to AUM. This is why an open-ended fund can grow and a close-ended one cannot.
  3. Outflows. Redemptions and repurchases cancel units and reduce AUM. So does an IDCW payout — money leaving the scheme for investors' bank accounts is money no longer under management.

AUM matters to the investor because it is the denominator of the expense ratio. Recurring expenses are charged as a percentage of AUM, and SEBI's limits are themselves slab-based on the size of assets, so a larger scheme is permitted a lower percentage. That is economies of scale arriving in the investor's NAV.

The formula

AUM of a scheme = Current NAV × Total units outstanding

At launch, AUM is simply the amount mobilised in the NFO.

A worked example

A mid-sized equity scheme reports 12.40 crore units outstanding at an NAV of Rs 84.50.

AUM = 12.40 crore × Rs 84.50 = Rs 1,047.80 crore

Over the next month three things happen:

EventEffect on AUM
Portfolio gains 4%, NAV rises to Rs 87.88+Rs 41.91 crore
Fresh purchases of Rs 60 crore (units created)+Rs 60.00 crore
Redemptions of Rs 25 crore (units cancelled)−Rs 25.00 crore
Closing AUMRs 1,124.71 crore

Notice that the first line moved AUM by Rs 41.91 crore without a single transaction by any investor, while the second and third changed the unit count. An investor reading only the AUM headline cannot tell a scheme that performed well from one that merely sold well — which is exactly why the workbook keeps NAV, units and AUM as three separate ideas.

For scale: the whole Indian industry stood at Rs 11.89 lakh crore in March 2015, Rs 66.70 lakh crore in March 2025 and Rs 73.73 lakh crore in March 2026.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 2.1.4 defines AUM alongside NAV and unit capital, and Chapter 2.3 uses it to describe the growth of the industry. Expect a direct computation (NAV × units), and expect the conceptual question on what makes AUM fall — where the answer that is missed is the IDCW payout, not just redemption. AUM also reappears in the expense-ratio slabs and in the trustees' core responsibility of ensuring AMCs do not mis-sell to grow AUM.

Common exam traps

  • AUM is not the same as inflows. A scheme can have record inflows and shrinking AUM if markets fell harder.
  • An IDCW payout reduces AUM; an IDCW reinvestment does not, because the money never leaves the scheme.
  • A large AUM is not automatically good. SEBI expressly makes the trustees responsible for checking that AMCs are not mis-selling in order to grow AUM.
  • Close-ended schemes cannot add AUM through inflows after the NFO — only performance moves them.
  • Do not confuse a scheme's AUM with the AMC's AUM. Fund-house league tables use the second.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series V-B

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it