All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Downstream Investment

An investment by an Indian investment vehicle in a domestic company. For a Category III AIF it is indirect foreign investment only if its sponsor or manager is not Indian owned and controlled.

In plain language

When a foreign investor puts money into an Indian company directly, the FDI rules apply to that investment. The harder question is what happens when the foreign money first goes into an Indian fund, and the fund then invests in an Indian company. That second step is the downstream investment.

The workbook defines it as an investment made by an Indian Investment Vehicle in a domestic company, where more than 51 percent of the investors in the vehicle are foreign investors. Ordinarily such investments are treated as "Indirect Foreign Investments" and are subject to the FDI restrictions.

For a Category III AIF, the RBI changed the test. What matters is not how much of the fund's money came from abroad, but who controls the fund: its sponsor and its investment manager.

How it works

The control test. Under RBI Notification No. FEMA 355/2015-RB dated 16 November 2015, a downstream investment made by a Category III AIF is regarded as indirect foreign investment only if either the sponsor or the investment manager is not Indian "owned and controlled". "Control" of the AIF must be in the hands of the sponsor or investment manager for the investment to be termed indirect foreign investment.

The fine print the workbook adds:

  • Where the sponsor or manager is organised in a form other than a company or LLP, SEBI determines whether it is foreign owned and controlled.
  • Where the sponsor and manager are individuals, they must be resident Indian citizens for the downstream investment to be treated as domestic.
  • The extent of foreign investment in the corpus of the Investment Vehicle is not a factor in deciding whether its downstream investment is foreign investment.

If the fund is foreign owned and controlled, its downstream investments must comply with the sectoral caps applicable under the FDI Policy to the sectors it invests in. A sectoral cap is the maximum permissible foreign investment in one industry sector.

Reporting. An Indian entity or investment vehicle making downstream investment in another Indian entity that is considered indirect foreign investment must file Form DI with the RBI within 30 days from the date of allotment of the equity instruments.

Paying for the units. A person resident outside India pays for Category III AIF units by debit to an FCNR, NRE or SNRR account held with an Authorised Dealer or Authorised Bank in India.

A worked example

Illustrative figures. Sahyadri Opportunities Fund is a Category III AIF with a corpus of Rs 300 crore, of which Rs 210 crore (70%) comes from foreign investors. It buys equity worth Rs 20 crore in an Indian listed company.

Case A — Indian-controlled. The sponsor and the investment manager are both Mumbai companies that are Indian owned and controlled.

Foreign share of corpus        70%   → not a factor
Sponsor Indian owned/controlled  yes
Manager Indian owned/controlled  yes
Result: the Rs 20 crore is treated as domestic investment

Case B — foreign-controlled manager. Same fund, but the investment manager is controlled by an overseas group. One of the two is not Indian owned and controlled, so the Rs 20 crore is indirect foreign investment. Suppose, illustratively, the investee's sector carries a foreign investment cap of 49%, its paid-up capital is Rs 500 crore, and foreign holding already stands at Rs 225 crore (45%):

Cap                 = 49% × Rs 500 crore = Rs 245 crore
Existing foreign    = Rs 225 crore
Headroom            = Rs 20 crore

The Rs 20 crore investment just fits. A Rs 30 crore investment would breach the cap by Rs 10 crore. If shares are allotted on 10 March, Form DI must reach the RBI within 30 days, by 9 April.

Case C — individuals. If the sponsor and manager are individuals, the investment is domestic only if they are resident Indian citizens.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 5 (Regulatory Framework), section 5.24.1 — Foreign Investments in AIFs lists this as one of the important reforms for foreign investment in a Category III AIF. The examinable points are the date and number of the RBI notification, the either sponsor or manager control test, the statement that the foreign share of the corpus does not matter, the resident-Indian-citizen rule for individuals, the sectoral-cap consequence of foreign control, and the 30-day Form DI deadline. The same section explains the Automatic and Approval Routes for foreign investors buying AIF units, so expect questions that mix the two.

Common exam traps

  • The 51% figure and the control test pull in different directions. The general definition refers to vehicles where more than 51 percent of investors are foreign; for a Category III AIF the workbook then says the extent of foreign investment in the corpus is not a factor — control of the sponsor or manager decides. Both statements are in Chapter 5; for a Category III AIF question, apply the control test.
  • "Either", not "both". If the sponsor or the manager is not Indian owned and controlled, the downstream investment is indirect foreign investment.
  • Individuals must be resident Indian citizens — Indian citizenship alone is not the workbook's wording.
  • Sectoral caps bite only on a foreign-controlled fund's downstream investments.
  • Form DI: 30 days from allotment of the equity instruments, filed with the RBI — not SEBI, and not from the date money was paid.
  • SEBI, not RBI, decides foreign ownership and control where the sponsor or manager is neither a company nor an LLP.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XIX-B

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it