All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Investment adviser

Also written Investment Adviser (Offshore Structure)

Any person who, for consideration, is in the business of giving investment advice, including anyone holding out as one — but not an AMFI-registered distributor whose advice is incidental to distribution.

In plain language

This definition comes from the SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013. In simple words, an investment adviser is someone who gives investment advice as a business and is paid for it. The rule also covers anyone who claims to be an adviser, whatever name they use.

The exact wording is worth knowing. An investment adviser is any person, who for consideration, is engaged in the business of providing investment advice to clients or other persons or group of persons. It also includes any person who holds out himself as an investment adviser, by whatever name called. "For consideration" means for a fee or some other payment. To "hold out" means to present yourself to others as one.

For a distributor, the key part is the exception. The rule leaves out a mutual fund distributor (MFD) registered with AMFI. But this holds only when the advice is incidental to its primary activity of distribution. Incidental means the advice comes along with the main job of selling funds. So an MFD can talk to a client about which fund suits her. It does not have to register with SEBI as an adviser for that.

Chapter 6 points out two results. First, a distributor cannot call itself an investment adviser. If it did, it would be holding out as one, and the rule would catch it. Second, an investment adviser cannot earn both an advisory fee and a distribution commission. The two jobs have to be kept apart.

How it works

The line between the two roles runs through several parts of the workbook:

AMFI-registered MFDSEBI-registered investment adviser
RegistrationAMFI, after the NISM V-A examinationSEBI, under the Investment Advisers Regulations, 2013
AdviceOnly incidental to distributionThe business itself, for consideration
Paid byCommission from the AMCFee from the client
May use the words adviser, advisor, wealth manager, consultantNoYes

Names. AMFI's Code of Conduct for Intermediaries (Appendix 3), citing Regulation 3(3) of the IA Regulations, bars an MFD from using Adviser / Advisor / Financial Adviser / Investment Adviser / Wealth Adviser / Wealth Manager / Consultant or any similar name unless registered with SEBI as an investment adviser. The MFD must tell the client it is acting as an MFD and display the tagline AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor.

Segregation. The same code reminds MFDs of the obligation on segregation of distribution and advisory services under the IA Regulations.

What the MFD still owes the client. Its transactions are either advisory (subject to appropriateness) or execution only (with a written warning where the product looks inappropriate). There is no third category, and suitability must be checked either way — not taking reasonable care over suitability is mis-selling under the SEBI PFUTP regulations.

A worked example

Illustrative. The people and amounts are hypothetical; the rules are the workbook's.

Kavita has Rs 10,00,000 to invest in an equity scheme and speaks to two professionals.

Ramesh, an AMFI-registered MFD. He recommends the regular plan and is paid commission by the AMC out of the scheme's expenses. Suppose his annual trail works out to 0.80 per cent: Rs 10,00,000 × 0.80% = Rs 8,000 a year, which Kavita never sees as a bill. His visiting card may say AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor. If it said Wealth Adviser, he would breach the code of conduct.

Priya, a SEBI-registered investment adviser. She charges Kavita a fee of, say, Rs 15,000 a year and recommends the direct plan, whose expense ratio excludes distribution commission. Priya cannot also take the Rs 8,000 commission — that would be earning from both advisory and distribution.

Ramesh (MFD)Priya (IA)
Plan recommendedRegularDirect
Paid byAMC (commission)Kavita (fee)
Annual cost to Kavita in this illustrationRs 8,000 inside the NAVRs 15,000 fee
May call himself or herself an adviserNoYes

Neither route is automatically cheaper; the point is that the source of pay and the title must match the registration.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 6 (Fund Distribution and Channel Management Practices), section 6.8, gives the definition, the exclusion for AMFI-registered distributors and the rule against earning from both advice and distribution; Box 6.8.3 explains the exemption and the mis-selling definition. Appendix 3 (AMFI's Code of Conduct for Intermediaries of Mutual Funds) cites Regulation 3(3) on names and the segregation obligation, and Chapter 5 tells an investor who cannot research a scheme to consult an MFD or a registered investment adviser. Expect questions on who is excluded from the definition and which titles an MFD may not use.

Common exam traps

  • Holding out is enough. Anyone who presents as an investment adviser, by whatever name called, falls within the definition.
  • The MFD exclusion is conditional: AMFI registration, and advice only incidental to distribution.
  • An MFD may not use adviser, advisor, wealth manager or consultant in its name unless SEBI-registered as an investment adviser.
  • An investment adviser cannot take both fees and distribution commission.
  • Suitability applies to the MFD too. Advisory or execution only, the distributor must still assess suitability; there is no third category.
  • Chapter 6 still says an execution-only customer pays nothing beyond standard flat transaction charges, but its own footnote records that SEBI withdrew the transaction charges framework in August 2025. Treat that line as stale.
  • The workbook names the regulations inconsistently (Investor Adviser Regulations, 2013 in Box 6.8.3). The instrument is the SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series V-A

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it