National saving
Also written National savings · Personal savings · Corporate savings · Public savings · Private savings
The savings of an entire economy, arrived at by adding the savings of its three constituents — personal savings, corporate savings and public savings.
In plain language
Saving is simply income left over after expenses. A country has 3 kinds of saver, so it has 3 kinds of saving.
Households save, and that is personal saving. Companies keep back profits they do not pay out, and that is corporate saving. Governments can save too, which is public saving — though in practice they usually run deficits instead.
Add the 3 together and you have national saving.
One more point, and the workbook is firm about it: saving is not the same thing as investing. Money set aside does nothing for the economy until it is channelled into productive use.
How it works
The 3 constituents. Section 5.3.2 works from the 3 groups the workbook has already named in the economy — individuals, corporates and government. Savings, "defined as income over expenses," are computed for all 3 separately: personal savings for individuals, corporate savings for corporates (their undistributed profits), and public savings for government.
The workbook adds a dry parenthesis on the last of these: public savings are "rarely there; governments generally run budget deficits."
The 2 groupings. Individuals and corporates may be clubbed together as private savings. And "economists arrive at National Saving by summing savings of these 3 constituents — personal, corporate, and public savings."
Saving is not investment. The workbook is explicit: "savings does not mean investment." Savings have to be channelled towards productive venues — given to corporates or government to invest and generate further earnings. When savings turn into investments they take the shape of a financial instrument: equity, bonds, government securities and others, which transfer funds from savers to the users who issue those securities.
What the conversion needs. Government and central bankers focus continuously on facilitating that conversion by building efficient and effective financial markets — the workbook names 6 features: a wide range of products, ease of conversion, simplicity in transactions, safety in dealing, low cost, and transparency in operations.
The verdict. "Higher levels of savings and higher conversion of those savings into investments are considered good for an economy."
On figures. Section 5.3.2 gives no numeric savings rate for India or anywhere else. The savings rate appears in 5.2 only as a name on the list of macro variables.
A worked example
Illustrative — the workbook gives no figures for this section. An economy in one financial year.
| Constituent | Savings | Grouping |
|---|---|---|
| Households (personal) | Rs 32,00,000 crore | private |
| Companies, undistributed profits (corporate) | Rs 12,00,000 crore | private |
| Government (public) | minus Rs 9,00,000 crore | public |
Private savings = Rs 32 lakh crore + Rs 12 lakh crore = Rs 44,00,000 crore. National saving = Rs 44 lakh crore minus Rs 9 lakh crore = Rs 35,00,000 crore.
The negative public figure is the workbook's own point made arithmetically: a government running a deficit is a dis-saver, and it pulls national saving below private saving.
Now the second half of the section. Suppose Rs 6,00,000 crore of that household saving sits in gold and idle cash. It is saving by the definition — income over expenses — but it has not been channelled into equity, bonds or government securities, so it funds nothing. Only the remaining Rs 29,00,000 crore reaches issuers who can deploy it. That gap between saving and investment is precisely why the workbook says policy makers focus on the conversion and not just on the savings rate.
Why NISM asks about it
Chapter 5.3.2 (Savings and Investments) is short and definitional, which makes it a clean source of recall questions.
The 3 that come up are: which 3 constituents are summed to reach national saving; what the savings of each constituent are called; and the distinction between saving and investment, which the workbook states as a rule rather than an observation. The 6 features of an efficient financial market are also listable and therefore examinable. Note that 5.3.6 connects back to this — a government running a large fiscal deficit is the negative public-savings case, borrowing the private sector's savings and pushing interest rates up.
Common exam traps
- This is national saving in the macroeconomic sense, not a savings product. It has nothing to do with the National Savings Certificate or any other small savings instrument — those are investments an individual buys, not an aggregate of an economy.
- Private savings is 2 constituents; national saving is 3. Personal plus corporate gives private; adding public gives national.
- Corporate savings means undistributed profits, not cash on the balance sheet.
- Public savings are usually negative. The workbook says governments generally run budget deficits, so assuming a positive public contribution is wrong.
- Saving is not investment. The workbook states this directly. Money in a locker is saving that finances nothing.
- Higher saving is good only if it converts. The workbook's verdict has 2 halves — higher savings and higher conversion into investments.
Check yourself
1.Which inflation index is used for Inflation Indexed Bonds, and which for the Inflation-Indexed National Saving Securities-Cumulative 2013?
- a)CPI for both
- b)WPI for IIBs and CPI for the IINSS-C
- c)CPI for IIBs and WPI for the IINSS-C
- d)WPI for both
Show the answer
Answer: (b) WPI for IIBs and CPI for the IINSS-C
For IIBs: the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) is the inflation measure that is considered for the calculation of the index ratio for these bonds.
For the retail instrument: the bond carries a fixed interest of 1.5% and an inflation rate calculated on the basis of the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
The two using different indices is exactly the kind of detail a 25%-negative-marking paper builds a question on.
How the IIB adjustment works: these bonds have a fixed real coupon rate which is applied to the inflation adjusted principal on each interest payment date. On maturity, the higher of the face value or inflation adjusted principal is paid out to the investors. The inflation adjustment to the principal is done by multiplying it with the index ratio, which is calculated by dividing the reference index on the settlement date by the reference index on the date of issue.
The IINSS-C features: these bonds of 10-year tenor were available to retail resident individuals, minors, HUFs, and charities among others. The interest is compounded every six months and cumulated and the same is payable with the principal on maturity. The fixed rate of interest is the floor and is payable even if there is deflation.
Why such bonds exist at all: debt instruments, being fixed income products, run the risk of delivering negative real returns during high inflation periods.
Where this is taught
Free preparation for NISM Series XVRelated terms
- Final goodsGoods consumed by participants in the economy rather than used up in further production — only these are counted when GDP is measured by the product method, so nothing is counted twice.
- Fiscal deficitThe budgeted excess of the government's expenditure over its revenues in a year, usually stated as a percentage of GDP and bridged by borrowing.
- Fiscal policyThe government's measures on its own revenues and expenses — taxation and spending — used to influence aggregate demand, savings, investment and overall economic activity.
- Gross Domestic ProductThe market value of all final goods and services produced inside a country's borders in a period, whoever owns the producer — the standard measure of the size and growth of an economy.
- MacroeconomicsThe study of the economy as a whole — the aggregate supply and demand factors such as GDP, unemployment, inflation, savings and investment, and the public policies that move them.
- Per capita incomeNational income divided by total population — a better gauge of living standards than national income alone, because it adjusts for how many people that income is shared across.