All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Simplified Customer Due Diligence

Also written Simplified CDD · SCDD · Simplified customer due diligence measures

The lighter version of CDD an IFSC regulated entity may apply to a customer rated low risk — never where there is a suspicion of money laundering or terrorist financing.

In plain language

Simplified due diligence is due diligence with the intensity turned down, not switched off.

The IFSCA Guidelines build CDD in three settings off the customer's risk rating. A customer rated low risk may be given simplified CDD, which the Guidelines describe as modifying the ordinary CDD process — verifying later, updating less often, monitoring against a sensible threshold, inferring rather than asking why the customer is there.

The point is proportion. Spending the same effort on an employee pension scheme as on an offshore company with nominee shareholders wastes the effort that the offshore company needs.

And there is one absolute limit: simplified CDD shall not be conducted where there is a suspicion of ML/TF.

How it works

When it applies. Where the risks of ML/TF are low, a regulated entity may conduct simplified CDD measures commensurate with the low risk factors (Chapter 6, section 6.6). Section 6.2.1 frames it as modifying the ordinary CDD under clause 5.4 for a customer assigned low risk.

The Guidelines' examples of simplified measures.

  1. Verifying the identity of the customer and beneficial owner after the business relationship is established
  2. Reducing the frequency of customer identification updates
  3. Reducing the degree of ongoing monitoring and scrutiny of transactions, based on a reasonable monetary threshold
  4. Not collecting specific information on the purpose and intended nature of the relationship, but inferring it from the type of transactions or relationship

What can make a customer low risk — among other things: a government entity; a public company listed on a stock exchange and subject to disclosure requirements ensuring adequate transparency of beneficial ownership; a regulated financial institution outside India supervised for AML/CFT to FATF standards, or its qualifying subsidiary; a public body or publicly owned enterprise; a resident of a low-risk geographical area. Low-risk products include non-life insurance, life insurance with no investment return or surrender value, certain pension products, reinsurance ceded by a regulated insurer, and pension schemes meeting all three conditions — retirement benefits to employees, contributions deducted from wages, and no assignment of a member's interest.

The limits.

  • Never where there is a suspicion of ML/TF.
  • The presence of one or more low-risk factors may not always indicate low risk — the overall risk is examined.
  • The PML Rules make the same point for the wider framework: simplified measures are not acceptable where there is suspicion, where specific higher-risk scenarios apply, or where the risk identified is not consistent with the national risk assessment.

Knock-on effect. Low-risk customers are updated once in every five years under the general periodicity (ten years for resident Indians with a Financial Group relationship in India).

A worked example

Illustrative.

Narmada Life (IFSC) provides a group pension policy to Oceanic Shipping Pte Ltd's 420 seafarers. Retirement benefits go to employees; contributions come out of wages; the scheme rules forbid assignment of a member's interest. All three pension conditions are met, and the customer risk assessment rates the relationship low.

Simplified measures adopted.

MeasureHow applied
Deferred verificationScheme opened on 3 March; verification of the sponsor's beneficial owners completed on 21 March
Updation frequencyEvery 5 years rather than annually
Monitoring thresholdContributions consistent with payroll are not individually scrutinised below USD 25,000 a month; anything above is reviewed
PurposeInferred from the nature of the scheme, not separately collected

Eighteen months later. Contributions jump to USD 310,000 in one month, paid not from the employer but from an unrelated trading company. The monitoring threshold throws it up. The moment the entity suspects ML/TF, simplified CDD is no longer available: it reviews the risk rating, applies full CDD and considers an STR. Simplified CDD was a judgement about a low-risk relationship — not a permanent licence for this customer.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 6 (IFSCA Guidelines for KYC Norms), section 6.6, lists the simplified measures and the suspicion bar; section 6.1.3 gives the low-risk indicators; section 6.2.1 links simplified CDD to a low rating; and Chapter 5, section 5.3(e), states the general principle of enhanced measures for high risk and simplified for low. Expect "which of the following is an example of simplified CDD?" and the true-or-false on whether it can be applied where there is a suspicion.

Common exam traps

  • Simplified is not exempt. It modifies CDD; it does not remove it.
  • Never where there is a suspicion of ML/TF — this is the line the exam draws most often.
  • "May", not "shall": low risk permits simplified CDD, it does not compel it.
  • One low-risk factor is not conclusive. A listed company can still be high risk on the overall facts.
  • The four examples: verify after establishment, update less often, monitor on a reasonable monetary threshold, infer purpose. Senior management approval is an enhanced measure, not a simplified one.
  • All three pension conditions must be met for that product to count as low risk.

Check yourself

  1. 1.When may simplified customer due diligence NOT be conducted?

    1. a)Where the customer is a government entity
    2. b)Where there is a suspicion of ML/TF
    3. c)Where the customer is a listed public company
    4. d)Where the product is non-life insurance
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) Where there is a suspicion of ML/TF

    Simplified CDD (SCDD) measures shall not be conducted where there is a suspicion of ML/TF.

    A hard limit that overrides any low-risk classification.

    Options A, C and D all describe low-risk indicators, which point towards simplified measures rather than away from them. Low-risk customer factors include a Government entity and public companies listed on a stock exchange and subject to disclosure requirements... which impose requirements to ensure adequate transparency of beneficial ownership; low-risk product factors include a Contract of Insurance that is non-life insurance.

    But a low-risk label yields to suspicion. The PML Rules say the same: simplified measures are not acceptable whenever there is a suspicion of money laundering or terrorist financing, or where specific higher-risk scenarios apply or where the risk identified is not consistent with the national risk assessment.

    What simplified measures may involve: verifying the identity of the customer and the beneficial owner after the establishment of the business relationship; reducing the frequency of customer identification updates; reducing the degree of on-going monitoring and scrutinizing transactions, based on a reasonable monetary threshold; and not collecting specific information or carrying out specific measures to understand the purpose and intended nature of the business relationship but inferring the purpose and nature from the type of transactions or business relationship established.

    Note "may" — where the risks of ML/TF are low, a Regulated Entity may conduct simplified CDD measures. It is a permission, not an obligation.

    And simplification modifies rather than removes CDD: the Guidelines describe it as modifying Customer Due Diligence process, in contrast to enhanced measures which come in addition to the CDD measures.

    One more caution on classification: the presence of one or more risk factors alone may not always indicate a low risk of ML/TF in a particular situation.

  2. 2.How does the chapter relate Enhanced CDD and Simplified CDD to ordinary Customer Due Diligence under Clause 5.4?

    1. a)Enhanced CDD replaces Clause 5.4 CDD for high-risk customers; Simplified CDD replaces it for low-risk customers
    2. b)Enhanced CDD is applied in addition to Clause 5.4 CDD for high-risk customers; Simplified CDD is applied by modifying Clause 5.4 CDD for low-risk customers
    3. c)Both are optional add-ons that a Regulated Entity may choose for any customer
    4. d)Clause 5.4 CDD applies only to medium-risk customers
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) Enhanced CDD is applied in addition to Clause 5.4 CDD for high-risk customers; Simplified CDD is applied by modifying Clause 5.4 CDD for low-risk customers

    After assigning a risk rating, while undertaking the CDD, a Regulated Entity shall:

    • i. undertake Customer Due Diligence measures as detailed under Clause 5.4, in respect of all the customers;
    • ii. undertake Enhanced Customer Due Diligence measures as detailed under Clause 5.6, in addition to the CDD measures detailed under Clause 5.4, in respect of the customer who has been assigned 'high risk'; and
    • iii. undertake Simplified Customer Due Diligence measures as detailed under Clause 5.7 by modifying Customer Due Diligence process detailed under Clause 5.4, in respect of a customer who has been assigned 'low risk'.

    The key words are in addition to for Enhanced CDD and by modifying for Simplified CDD.

    Why the others are wrong:

    • Option A says Enhanced CDD replaces the base CDD. It does not. A high-risk customer still gets full Clause 5.4 CDD and then more on top.
    • Option C makes both optional. Enhanced CDD is mandatory for high-risk customers: where the risks of ML/TF are high, a Regulated Entity shall conduct enhanced CDD measures. Simplified CDD is the one that is optional (may conduct simplified CDD measures), and only for low risk.
    • Option D is wrong because Clause 5.4 CDD applies in respect of all the customers.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series IFSCA-01

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it