Social Impact Assessment Organisation
Also written Social Impact Assessment Organization · SIA Organisation
An entity that employs Social Impact Assessors and has either a 3-year SIA track record or at least two full-time assessors with 3 years' experience each, who sign the report; it assesses AIRs of listed projects.
In plain language
A Social Impact Assessor is an individual. A Social Impact Assessment Organisation (SIAO) is the firm or entity through which assessors do regulated work on the Social Stock Exchange.
The distinction matters because of Regulation 91E of the SEBI LODR Regulations. The Annual Impact Report for a listed project must be assessed by a Social Impact Assessment Organisation employing Social Impact Assessor(s) — not by a freelance individual acting alone.
An SIAO must also run the organisational machinery an individual cannot: a system of quality control, documented policies, competent teams and supervision of any field research agency it uses.
How it works
Definition (Chapter 2, 2.2.3). A Social Impact Assessment Organisation means any entity which has:
- (i) employed Social Impact Assessors and has a track record of minimum 3 years in conducting social impact assessment; or
- (ii) employed at least two full-time Social Impact Assessors, each with minimum experience of three years in conducting social impact assessment, who shall sign the social impact assessment report.
It must employ assessors who have qualified the NISM certification and are registered with an SRO or other SEBI-specified agency.
What it assesses (Chapter 9, Regulation 91E):
| Project status | Annual Impact Report |
|---|---|
| Listed project | Assessed by an SIAO employing Social Impact Assessors |
| Non-listed project | Self-certified |
| Enterprise only registered, not raising funds | Self-certified |
Quality control (Chapter 5, 5.10). An SIAO's policies and procedures should address:
- leadership responsibilities for quality within the firm
- ethical requirements
- acceptance and continuance of relationships and engagements, including scope
- human resources, including engagement of experts
- engagement performance, including the assessment trail
- monitoring
Documentation (5.11.1). The final engagement file should be assembled on a timely basis, usually not more than 60 days after the date of the report. After that, nothing may be deleted or discarded before its retention period ends.
In practice. Chapter 8's sample report is signed off by an SIAO. It lists the organisation's responsibilities — setting the audit programme's extent, managing risks, selecting competent teams, monitoring and improving the programme — and quotes the assessor's SRO registration number.
A worked example
Illustrative firms and dates.
Three firms want to assess the Annual Impact Report of an NPO's listed ZCZP project.
| Firm | Profile | Qualifies as SIAO? |
|---|---|---|
| Samarth Impact Advisors LLP, Delhi | Employs 4 registered SIAs; has done social impact assessments since 2021 (5 years) | Yes — limb (i): employs SIAs, track record ≥ 3 years |
| NewLeaf Assurance Pvt Ltd, Chennai | Set up in 2025; two full-time SIAs with 4 and 6 years' SIA experience | Yes — limb (ii), and those two must sign the report |
| Vikas Consulting, Jaipur | Set up in 2024; one full-time SIA with 9 years' experience plus two part-time SIAs | No — under 3 years' track record, and fewer than two full-time SIAs |
Vikas has the most experienced individual, and still fails. Limb (ii) counts full-time assessors and needs two.
NewLeaf's timeline. It signs its assessment report on 15 November 2026. Its engagement file — work papers, sampling records, FGD notes — should be assembled usually within 60 days, by about 14 January 2027. After assembly, nothing in the file may be deleted before its retention period ends.
What the NPO does with it. The NPO files its Annual Impact Report with the SSE with NewLeaf's assessment report attached, by 31 October or the income-tax return due date, whichever is later. For a report signed on 15 November, the NPO's return due date must fall after that.
Why NISM asks about it
Chapter 2 (2.2.3) gives the two-limb definition. Chapter 5 covers SIAO quality control (5.10) and documentation, including the 60-day engagement file (5.11.1). Chapter 9 (9.2.4) makes the SIAO the assessor of AIRs for listed projects, and Chapter 8's sample report is written in the SIAO's voice. Expect a definition question built on the "3 years" and "two full-time assessors" limbs, and a question separating SIAO-assessed from self-certified reports.
Common exam traps
- The two limbs are alternatives ("or"). A firm needs either a 3-year track record or two full-time SIAs with 3 years each.
- Under limb (ii), those two assessors sign the report.
- Listed project → SIAO-assessed. Non-listed or registered-only → self-certified.
- SIAO vs SIA. The organisation is an entity; the assessor is an individual registered with an SRO.
- The engagement file is usually assembled within 60 days of the report date. Do not confuse this with the 60-day deadline for NPOs' non-financial disclosures under LODR 91C.
- The workbook spells it "Organization" and "Organisation" interchangeably. Same thing.
Check yourself
1.A firm set up one year ago employs two full-time Social Impact Assessors, each with four years of assessment experience, who sign its reports. Is it a Social Impact Assessment Organisation?
- a)No — the firm itself needs a 3-year track record
- b)Yes — it meets the route of at least two full-time SIAs each with minimum 3 years' experience who sign the report
- c)No — it needs at least three full-time SIAs
- d)Yes — any firm employing an SIA qualifies
Show the answer
Answer: (b) Yes — it meets the route of at least two full-time SIAs each with minimum 3 years' experience who sign the report
There are two alternative routes: (i) employs SIAs and has a 3-year track record; or (ii) employs at least two full-time SIAs, each with minimum three years' experience, who sign the report. This firm meets route (ii).
Option A treats route (i) as mandatory. Option C invents a higher headcount. Option D ignores both conditions.
2.A Social Enterprise has raised funds through a Social Stock Exchange for one listed project and also runs two non-listed projects. How should its annual impact report be handled?
- a)All three projects must be assessed by a Social Impact Assessment Organisation
- b)The listed project is assessed by a Social Impact Assessment Organisation employing Social Impact Assessors; non-listed projects are self-certified
- c)All three projects may be self-certified
- d)Only the non-listed projects need assessment, since the listed one is already disclosed in the offer document
Show the answer
Answer: (b) The listed project is assessed by a Social Impact Assessment Organisation employing Social Impact Assessors; non-listed projects are self-certified
Regulation 91E: the report shall be assessed by a Social Impact Assessment Organisation employing Social Impact Assessor(s) for listed project(s) and shall be self-certified for non-listed project(s).
Option A over-extends assessment. Option C ignores that funds were raised for a listed project. Option D reverses the rule — the offer document is a pre-issue disclosure, not an impact assessment.
Where this is taught
Free preparation for NISM Series XXIIIRelated terms
- Annual Impact ReportThe yearly report of social impact every social enterprise registered on or raising funds through an SSE must file under LODR Regulation 91E, covering at least 67% of the previous year's programme expenditure.
- Social Impact AssessmentA systematic evaluation of the social, ethical, cultural and environmental consequences of a project or organisation — positive and negative, intended and unintended — taking an "outside in" view.
- Social Impact Assessment StandardsICAI's sixteen thematic standards, SAS 100 to SAS 1600, mirroring the SSE's eligible activities; compliance is mandatory for social impact assessments of social enterprises listed on an SSE.
- Social Impact AssessorAn individual registered with an SRO (under ICAI or another SEBI-specified agency) who has passed the NISM certification and holds a valid certificate; performs independent verification of impact reports.