All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Unit of trading

Also written Unit of trading (IRF) · Trading unit

The quantity in one contract — for Indian bond and T-Bill futures, notional bonds of Rs 2 lakh face value, which is 2,000 units of Rs 100 — and the reason exposures round rather than match.

In plain language

An exchange decides everything about a futures contract except the price. The unit of trading is the size it fixes: one lot equals notional bonds of Rs 2,00,000 face value, that is 2,000 bonds of Rs 100 each.

That number governs more than order entry. It is why an exposure of Rs 3 lakh cannot be hedged exactly — the face value traded must be an integral multiple of Rs 2 lakh. It is why the tick value differs between contracts built on the same Rs 0.0025 tick size. And it is the bridge between the two ways a bond position is measured, because prices are quoted per Rs 100 of face value in both the cash and futures markets:

Market value = Face value × (Market price ÷ 100)

Against the wholesale debt market's cash lot of Rs 5 crore — equal to 250 futures contracts — the exchange lot is small, and deliberately so. The workbook makes the point that exchange-traded markets can serve hedging requirements too small for the OTC market to price at all.

How it works

Not every interest rate contract is sized in bonds.

ContractUnit of trading
Cash settled GOI bond futures (6Y, 10Y, 13Y)1 lot = notional bonds of Rs 2 lakh face value = 2,000 bonds
91-day T-Bill futures1 contract = 2,000 units, face value Rs 2 lakh
Exchange traded interest rate options1 lot = notional bonds of Rs 2 lakh face value = 2,000 bonds
Overnight MIBOR futuresinterest on a notional principal of Rs 5 crore for one month, on a 30/365 basis
Corporate bond index futurescontract value not less than Rs 2 lakh at introduction, reviewed half-yearly

The MIBOR contract is the odd one out and the exam knows it: there is no bond and no face value, only an interest amount on a notional principal. Orders are entered in number of contracts and the quotation is an interest rate rather than a price.

The corporate bond index contract fixes a value floor rather than a quantity, and the exchanges review it half-yearly — a different mechanism again.

The formula

Bond futures / T-Bill futures / IRO
   1 lot            = Rs 2,00,000 face value = 2,000 units of Rs 100
   Contract value   = Trade price × 2,000
   Market value     = Face value × (Market price ÷ 100)

Overnight MIBOR futures
   1 lot            = interest on Rs 5 crore for one month, 30/365 basis
   Value of 1 bp    = Rs 5,00,00,000 × 0.01% × 30/365 = Rs 411

Lots needed to hedge a face value exposure = Face value ÷ Rs 2,00,000

A worked example

The rounding problem, which is the whole point of the entry. Three hedgers, three exposures:

Exposure (face value)Exact lotsTradedResidual
Rs 5,00,00,000250.00250 lotsnil
Rs 5,30,00,000265.00265 lotsnil
Rs 5,37,00,000268.50268 or 269Rs 1,00,000 unhedged or Rs 1,00,000 over-hedged

The first two hedge perfectly because the exposure happens to be a multiple of Rs 2 lakh. The third cannot, and no amount of care will fix it — the workbook lists exactly this standardisation as a cause of imperfect hedge.

The Chapter 5 short hedge, sized. An investor holds Rs 5 crore of 6.10% G-Secs 2031 and sells futures at Rs 99.95:

Lots = Rs 5,00,00,000 ÷ Rs 2,00,000 = 250 lots

At expiry the contract settles at Rs 98.36:

Profit = (99.95 − 98.36) × 250 lots × 2,000 units = Rs 7,95,000

The 2,000 in that line is the unit of trading doing its work.

Same tick size, three tick values. Every one of these contracts has a tick size of Rs 0.0025, and not one of them has the same tick value:

Bond futures   : 2,000 × 0.0025               = Rs   5.00
T-Bill futures : 2,000 × 0.0025 × 0.25        = Rs   1.25
MIBOR futures  : 0.25 bp × Rs 411             = Rs 102.75

The unit of trading, and what it is a unit of, explains the whole spread.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 3, section 3.3, states the unit of trading inside every contract specification, and section 3.4 (Lot Size, Tick Size and Change in Contract Value for each Tick change) works the arithmetic for cash settled GOI bond futures, 91-day T-Bill futures and Overnight MIBOR futures in turn — including the observation that face value must be an integral multiple of Rs 2 lakh, so Rs 3 lakh or Rs 5 lakh cannot be traded. Chapter 4, section 4.9, repeats it for interest rate options.

Questions ask for the number of lots needed to hedge a stated face value, for the contract value or tick value of a given contract, or simply for the lot size of a named contract — the Rs 2 lakh and 2,000 units being direct recall.

Common exam traps

  • Rs 2 lakh is face value, not money paid. Contract value is price × 2,000, which equals Rs 2 lakh only when the price is exactly 100.
  • Face value must be a whole multiple of Rs 2 lakh. Rs 3 lakh and Rs 5 lakh exposures simply cannot be traded, which is the workbook's own example.
  • MIBOR futures are not sized in bonds. One contract is interest on Rs 5 crore for a month — no face value, no units of Rs 100.
  • Do not carry a tick value across contracts. Rs 5, Rs 1.25 and Rs 102.75 all come from the same Rs 0.0025 tick size applied to different units.
  • The cash market lot is Rs 5 crore, the futures lot Rs 2 lakh — 250 futures contracts to one WDM lot, and the exam has asked for that ratio.
  • Corporate bond index futures fix a minimum contract value, not a lot size, and it is reviewed half-yearly rather than fixed.

Check yourself

  1. 1.What does one Overnight MIBOR futures contract represent, and what is the value of 1 basis point per contract?

    1. a)Notional bonds of face value Rs 2 lakh; Rs 5 per basis point
    2. b)Interest on a notional principal of Rs 1 crore for three months; Rs 250 per basis point
    3. c)Interest on a notional principal of Rs 5 crore for one year on an Actual/365 basis; Rs 5,000 per basis point
    4. d)Interest on a notional principal of Rs 5 crore for one month, calculated on a 30/365 day basis at the average daily FBIL overnight MIBOR for the contract month; Rs 411 per basis point
    Show the answer

    Answer: (d) Interest on a notional principal of Rs 5 crore for one month, calculated on a 30/365 day basis at the average daily FBIL overnight MIBOR for the contract month; Rs 411 per basis point

    Unit of trading: "Interest on notional principal of Rs. 5 crores for one month calculated on 30/365 day basis at a rate equal to average daily FBIL overnight MIBOR for the contract month."

    Value of 1 bp: "Rs. 411 = (Rs. 5 Crores * 0.01% * 30/365)". So contract value = Quoted Rate × 100 × 411, and one tick of 0.25 bp = Rs 102.75.

    Why the others are wrong:

    • (a) A Rs 2 lakh face value lot belongs to GOI bond futures and T-Bill futures. Rs 5 is the tick value of GOI bond futures, not a basis point value.
    • (b) The principal and the period are both wrong.
    • (c) The period is one month (30/365), not a full year. Rs 5,000 would be the full-year value of 1 bp on Rs 5 crore.
  2. 2.For an exchange traded interest rate option, which of the following correctly states the unit of trading and the contract value?

    1. a)1 lot = notional bonds of face value ₹2 crore; contract value = strike price × 2,000
    2. b)1 lot = 200 bonds; contract value = trade price × 200
    3. c)1 lot = notional bonds of face value ₹20 lakh; contract value = premium × 20,000
    4. d)1 lot = notional bonds of face value ₹2 lakh, i.e. 2,000 bonds; contract value = trade price × 2,000
    Show the answer

    Answer: (d) 1 lot = notional bonds of face value ₹2 lakh, i.e. 2,000 bonds; contract value = trade price × 2,000

    The contract specification: "Unit of Trading — 1 Lot (1 lot = notional bonds of FV INR 2 Lakhs i.e. 2000 bonds)" and "Contract Value — Trade Price × 2000." The premium is quoted in Indian Rupees and the tick size is Rs 0.0025.

    This is why the workbook turns a per-unit premium of ₹0.20 into a maximum loss per lot of Rs 400 (= 2000 × 0.20).

    • (a) inflates the face value a hundredfold and uses the strike instead of the trade price.
    • (b) and (c) use lot sizes that do not appear in the specification.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series IV

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it