All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Futures contract

Also written Futures · Future · Equity futures · Index futures · Stock futures

A standardised forward traded on an exchange, where the exchange fixes every term except the price and the clearing corporation guarantees settlement, so neither side carries the other's default risk.

In plain language

A futures contract is a forward with its two defects engineered out.

Take the private agreement, make every term identical for everybody — same underlying, same lot size, same expiry dates, same tick size — and list it on an exchange. Now the contract you hold is interchangeable with the one everybody else holds, so there is a market in it and you can get out whenever you like by trading the opposite way. That fixes illiquidity.

Then put a clearing corporation between the two sides, so that in law your counterparty is the clearing corporation rather than the stranger who took the other side. Collect margin from both of them and settle the profit and loss every single day. That fixes counterparty risk.

What is left is the same economic bargain as a forward: buy or sell a fixed quantity on a fixed future date at a price fixed today.

How it works

The exchange decides everything except the price. Price is the one term discovered by the free interaction of buyers and sellers on the trading platform; the rest arrives as contract specifications.

The workbook lists the features as: a contract between two parties through the exchange; a centralised trading platform; price discovery through free interaction of buyers and sellers; margins payable by both parties; quality decided today; quantity decided today.

A buyer of futures takes a long position, a seller takes a short position. The words are figurative — no money and no underlying asset changes hands between them when the deal is originated; only margin is placed with the exchange.

The standardisation that solves the forward's problems creates the futures contract's own limitations, which the workbook states plainly: limited maturities, a limited set of underlyings, no flexibility in contract design, and higher administrative cost because of daily mark-to-market settlement. A company that needs 7,340 kg delivered on 19 November cannot get it from a futures market.

The formula

Contract value = Futures price × Lot size (contract multiplier)

A worked example

From the NSE quote for Nifty futures on 3 October 2025 that the workbook reproduces:

SpecificationValue
Instrument typeIndex futures
Underlying assetNifty 50
Expiry date28 October 2025
Open24,950.40
High25,020.00
Low24,878.60
Closing futures price25,006.60
Underlying (spot) value24,894.25

Taking the workbook's assumed lot size of 65:

Contract value = 25,006.60 × 65 = Rs 16,25,429

That single number is the whole lesson. A trader who buys one lot has taken on an exposure of over Rs 16 lakh while depositing only the initial margin — a fraction of it.

Three more specifications follow from the same quote. The tick size for Nifty futures is 5 paise, so the price can only move in steps of 0.05. Trading hours are 9.15 am to 3.30 pm, Monday to Friday. The final settlement price is the closing value of the Nifty in the cash segment on 28 October 2025 — the last Tuesday of the expiry month — not the futures price on that day.

The BSE Sensex futures contract is specified differently again, with a contract size of 20. Contract size is a decision of the exchange, revised as index levels and stock prices change, never something you should assume.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 3, sections 3.2 and 3.3, are the core of the paper. Section 3.2 lists the features and limitations; 3.3 walks through the contract specifications of a Nifty futures contract line by line. Expect direct computation of contract value from futures price and lot size, questions on which term the exchange does not decide (the price), and the forwards-versus-futures comparison in every form. The distinction between the daily settlement price and the final settlement price is examined separately and is a reliable source of marks.

Common exam traps

  • The exchange fixes every term except price. Candidates reverse this. Price is discovered; quantity, quality, expiry and tick size are imposed.
  • Contract value is computed on the futures price, not the spot price. In the quote above those are 25,006.60 and 24,894.25 — different numbers, and only one of them is right.
  • Both buyer and seller pay initial margin. Both have an obligation, so both are a risk to the system. This is the sharpest contrast with options, where only the seller posts margin.
  • The final settlement price is a cash-market number. It is the closing price of the underlying index or stock on the last trading day, not the last traded futures price.
  • Standardisation is a limitation as well as a virtue. If a question asks for a limitation of futures, "lack of flexibility in contract design" and "limited maturities" are the answers — not counterparty risk, which futures removed.
  • Long and short describe direction, not order of events. A trader can short a futures contract he has never owned; nothing is borrowed.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series X-A

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it