All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

WSP trading prohibition

Also written WSP conflict-of-interest bar

The bar on a WSP, its management, relatives and group concerns from trading, directly or indirectly, in the exact commodity it is accredited to store — with no exemption ever given.

In plain language

A Warehouse Service Provider knows things about the commodity it stores that ordinary traders do not — exactly how much stock is sitting in its warehouses, its quality, and when it moves in or out. That is exactly the kind of information edge a rulebook has to close off before someone can misuse it.

So SEBI does not just regulate how a WSP stores goods. It flatly bars the WSP, and the people closely connected to it, from trading in the very commodity it is accredited to store.

How it works

Chapter 7, section 7.4, sets the bar broadly, not just against the WSP company itself. It reaches the WSP's key managerial personnel, including whole-time directors, and their relatives as defined under the Companies Act, 2013; entities owned or controlled by the WSP's promoters, management, group concerns or associates, directly or indirectly; and persons acting in concert with any of them. None of these may trade on the exchange, directly or indirectly, in the commodity for which the WSP is accredited — and the clearing corporation is explicitly told it shall not provide any exemption in this regard, for anyone.

This bar sits alongside, but is distinct from, the WSP's other obligations — its net worth requirement of Rs 10 crore to Rs 50 crore by category of goods, and its storage exposure cap of 33 times that net worth. The trading bar addresses the conflict-of-interest risk specifically; the net worth and exposure rules address its financial soundness as a custodian.

A worked example

A WSP is accredited to store chana for a clearing corporation. Its managing director wants to buy 50 lots of chana futures on the exchange, believing his inside knowledge of falling warehouse stock levels gives him an edge.

He is barred from doing so — the prohibition covers him personally as a key managerial person of the accredited WSP, with no exemption available regardless of the size of the position or his reason for wanting it. The same bar would apply if he instead tried to route the trade through a company his brother, acting in concert with him, controls — the rule is written specifically to catch that indirect route as well, not just a trade placed in the WSP's or the director's own name.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 7 (Clearing, Settlement and Risk Management), section 7.4, in the list of key requirements prescribed for WSPs, warehouses and assayers. Expect a question testing how far the prohibition reaches — beyond the WSP company itself, to key managerial personnel, their Companies Act relatives, and persons acting in concert — and that no exemption is ever available.

Common exam traps

  • The bar covers indirect trading through related entities and persons acting in concert, not just trades in the WSP's own name.
  • No exemption is available, for anyone covered by the bar — the workbook states this explicitly, ruling out a "special permission" answer choice.
  • This is a distinct rule from the WSP's net worth and 33-times exposure cap — the trading bar is about conflict of interest, not financial soundness.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XVI

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it