NISM Series III-A · Chapter 15: Depositories Act 1996
L1 · FoundationThe Depositories Act, 1996
What the Act was made to do — free transferability, dematerialisation and book-entry ownership records; the IFSC carve-out; the rights and obligations of depositories, including the registered owner and beneficial owner distinction, the option to opt out and the indemnity for negligence; SEBI's powers of enquiry, inspection, direction and disgorgement; the penalties under sections 19A to 19FA and the offence under section 20; and the miscellaneous provisions on composition of offences, immunity and appeals to SAT and the Supreme Court.
20 min read · Worth 2% of the paper · Written from pages 319–324 of the official NISM workbook · Updated 17 September 2026
What this chapter covers
This chapter carries 2 per cent of the III-A examination.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this chapter, you should know about: Rights and Obligations of depositories · Enquiry and Inspection of depositories, DPs by SEBI · Penalties applicable in case of infringement of the conditions laid down in the depositories act or related regulations.
15.1 Introduction
The Depositories Act, 1996 provides for the establishment of depositories in securities to ensure free transferability of securities with speed, accuracy and security by (a) making securities freely transferable subject to certain exceptions; (b) dematerialization of the securities in the depository mode; and (c) providing for the maintenance of ownership records in a book-entry form.
Three mechanisms, one object — and the object is stated as free transferability of securities with speed, accuracy and security. That is the sentence the first review question rests on: it is the Depositories Act that provides for the establishment of depositories.
How settlement changed. In order to streamline the settlement process, the Act envisages the transfer of ownership of securities electronically by book entry.
And what the company lost. The Act has made the securities of all companies freely transferable in the depository mode, restricting the company's right to use discretion in effecting the transfer of securities. The other procedural and the transfer deed requirements stated in the Companies Act have also been dispensed with.
No transfer deed, and no company discretion — a share held in demat form moves by book entry, not by the issuer's permission.
The IFSC carve-out
International Finance Securities Centre Authority Act, 2019 (IFSCA Act) read with Section 23 G of Depositories Act clarifies that the powers exercisable by SEBI under Depositories Act, 1996 shall not extend to International Finance Service Centres set up under 18(1) of Special Economic Zones Act, 2005.
**Instead, powers under this Act, shall be exercisable by the International Finance Services Centres Authority established under section 4 (1) of IFSCA Act in so far as regulation of financial products, financial services and financial institutions are permitted in International Finance Services Centre are concerned.
One Act, two regulators, divided by geography.
15.2 Rights and obligations of depositories
Agreement first. An entity intending to act as a depository participant should enter into an agreement with the Depository in the prescribed format.
With the Depository — not the issuer, not a bank, not a broker. That is the third review question.
Transfers. Every depository shall on receipt of intimation from a participant, register the transfer of security in the name of the transferee. If the beneficial owner or a transferee of any security seeks to have custody of such security the depository shall inform the issuer accordingly.
The investor's choice. Every person subscribing to securities shall have the option either to receive or hold securities certificates with a depository and if the person opts to hold with a depository, the issuer shall intimate depository the details of allotment and on receipt of such information, the depository shall enter the name of allottee as the beneficial owner of the security.
Fungibility. All securities held by a depository shall be dematerialized and shall be in fungible form.
Fungible means one share is indistinguishable from another of the same class — there are no distinguishing certificate numbers to track, which is what makes book-entry transfer possible at all.
Statutory registers. The register and index of beneficial owners maintained by a depository under Section 11 of the Depositories Act, 1996 shall be deemed to be the corresponding register and index under the Companies Act.
Reporting to the issuer. Depository shall inform the issuer about the transfer of securities in the name of beneficial owners at such intervals and as prescribed by bye-laws.
Registered owner and beneficial owner
Depository shall be deemed to be the registered owner for the purpose of effecting transfer of ownership of security on behalf of a beneficial owner. However, Depository as a registered owner shall not have any voting rights or any other rights in respect of securities held by it.
And on the other side: the beneficial owner shall be entitled to all rights and benefits and be subjected to all the liabilities in respect of his securities held by a depository.
A clean split. The depository's name is on the register so that transfers can be effected; every economic and governance right — dividends, bonus, voting — stays with the beneficial owner, as does every liability.
Which is why the depository holds nothing of its own. It is a registered owner for the purpose of effecting transfer and no other purpose.
Opting out
If a beneficial owner seeks to opt-out of a depository in case of any security, he shall inform the depository accordingly. Thereafter, the depository shall make appropriate entries in its records and inform the issuer accordingly. The issuer on fulfilment of all conditions as per the regulations by the depository shall issue new certificates to the beneficial owner within thirty days of the receipt of information from the depository.
Thirty days for new certificates — the mirror of dematerialisation, and the reason the demat system is optional rather than compulsory for the holder.
Indemnity
When any loss is caused to the beneficial owner due to negligence of the depository or the participant, the depository shall indemnify the beneficial owner. Where such loss is indemnified by the depository, it can recover the same from the participant where such loss is due to the negligence of the participant.
The investor looks to one party. The depository pays first, whoever was negligent, and then recovers from the participant if the fault was the participant's. The investor is not made to litigate about which link in the chain failed.
15.3 Enquiry and inspection
SEBI may call upon any issuer, depository, depository participant or beneficial owner to furnish information in writing relating to the securities held in a depository. SEBI may also require or it may authorize any person to make an enquiry or inspection in relation to the affairs of the issuer, beneficial owner, depository participant who shall submit a report of such enquiry or inspection to it within the period specified by SEBI.
Note that the beneficial owner is on the list — SEBI may require information from the investor as well as from the institutions.
And the duty of production is personal. Every director, partner, manager, officer, employee or secretary of the depository or beneficial owner or issuer or participant shall produce all information and documents as per the requirement of the person conducting the enquiry or inspection.
Then directions. After making or causing to be made an enquiry, SEBI can issue appropriate directions to the depository or participant or any person associated with securities market or to any issuer as may be appropriate in the interest of investors or the securities market.
Including disgorgement. It is hereby declared that the power to issue directions under this section shall include and always be deemed to have been included the power to direct any person, who made a profit or averted loss by indulging in any transaction or activity in contravention of the provisions of this Act or regulations made thereunder, to disgorge an amount equivalent to the wrongful gain made or loss averted by such contravention.
Profit made or loss averted — both are recoverable, and the declaration is retrospective in effect, since the power is always be deemed to have been included.
15.3.1 Penalties
Five penalty sections share one formula, and one does not.
| Section | Default | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| 19A | Failure to furnish any information, document, books, returns or report to SEBI or filing any return within the time specified thereof, or filing of false, incorrect or incomplete information | Not less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees for each day during which such failure continues subject to a maximum of one crore rupees |
| 19A | Failure to maintain books of account or records | Same |
| 19B | Failure to enter into an agreement either by an intermediary or any issuer | Same |
| 19C | Failure to address investors' grievances after being asked by SEBI within the given time | Same |
| 19D | Delay in dematerialization or issue of a certificate of securities | Same |
| 19F | Failure to comply by the SEBI directions issued under section 19 within the specified time | Same |
| 19FA | Failure to conduct business in a fair manner | Not less than five crore rupees but which may extend to twenty-five crore rupees or three times the amount of gains made out of such failure, whichever is higher |
The common formula — a minimum of one lakh, one lakh per day of continuance, capped at one crore — is what the fourth review question asks about: the maximum is Rs. one crore.
Section 19FA is the outlier, and deliberately so. Where a depository fails to conduct its business with its participants or any issuer or its agent or any person associated with the securities markets in a fair manner in accordance with the made rules, regulations or the directions issued by SEBI under this Act, the penalty starts at five crore rupees and runs to twenty-five crore rupees or three times the amount of gains made out of such failure, whichever is higher.
A depository is market infrastructure. Unfair conduct by it is not a filing lapse; it distorts the market for everyone who must use it.
Section 20 — the criminal offence
Without prejudice to any award of penalty by adjudicating officer or SEBI, if any person contravenes or attempts to contravene or abets the contravention of the Depositories Act or rules or regulations or bye-laws made thereunder or fails to pay the penalty imposed by the adjudicating officer or to comply with any of his directions or orders, then such person shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend up to 10 years, or with fine up to Rs. 25 crores, or with both.
Three things are punishable alike — contravention, an attempt to contravene, and abetment. And non-payment of a penalty is itself an offence.
Ten years, Rs. 25 crores, or both — and without prejudice to the monetary penalty already imposed.
15.4 Miscellaneous
Composition of offences
Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedures, any offence punishable under this Act, not being an offence punishable with imprisonment only, or with imprisonment and also with fine, may either before or after the institution of any proceeding, be compounded by the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) or a court before which such proceedings are pending.
What may not be compounded — an offence punishable with imprisonment only, or with imprisonment and also with fine. Compounding is available where a fine alone is possible.
And who may compound — the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) or a court before which such proceedings are pending, either before or after the institution of any proceeding.
Immunity
The Central Government may, on recommendation by SEBI and if satisfied, grant immunity from prosecution or penalty to a person, who is alleged to have violated Depositories Act or the rules or regulations made thereunder, if such person has made full and true disclosure of such alleged violation.
Full and true disclosure is the condition — which is what the second review question confirms as True.
Two limits. No such immunity may be granted where the prosecution proceedings have already been initiated before the receipt of an application for grant of immunity, and the recommendation of SEBI under this sub-section is not binding upon the Central Government.
And immunity can be lost. The government may also withdraw immunity given to a person if it is satisfied that such person had given false evidence and hence may be tried for the offence.
Appeals
Any person aggrieved by an order of the SEBI made under this Act or the regulations made thereunder may prefer an appeal to the Central Government within such time as may be prescribed.
Appeal to the Securities Appellate Tribunal:
Any person aggrieved by an order of the SEBI or Adjudicating Officer (AO) may prefer an appeal to the SAT.
Every appeal shall be filed within a period of 45 days from the date on which a copy of the order made by SEBI or AO is received by the aggrieved party in such format and accompanied by such fees as prescribed — though the SAT may entertain an appeal after the expiry of the said period of 45 days if it is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not filing it within that period.
On receipt of an appeal, the SAT may, after giving the parties to the appeal an opportunity of being heard, pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit, confirming, modifying or setting aside the order appealed against, and shall send a copy of every order made by it to the SEBI, the parties to the appeal and the concerned AO.
Representation is wide: the appellant may either appear in person or authorize one or more chartered accountants or company secretaries or cost accountants or legal practitioners or any of its officers to present his or its case before the SAT.
Appeal to the Supreme Court:
Any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the SAT may file an appeal to the Supreme Court within 60 days from the date of communication of the SAT order to him on any question of law arising out of such order. Provided that the Supreme Court may, if it is satisfied, allow the appeal to be filed within a further period not exceeding 60 days.
Sixty days, extendable by a further sixty — and only on a question of law. Findings of fact stop at the Tribunal.
The chapter's review questions confirm that it is the Depositories Act that provides for the establishment of depositories in the securities market; that it is True that immunity may be granted by the Central Government on SEBI's recommendation only where the person has made full disclosure of the violation; that a depository participant enters into an agreement with the Depository in the prescribed format; and that the penalty for failure to furnish information, books, documents or reports is capped at Rs. one crore.
Think of it like this
Registered owner, beneficial owner — who holds what
The whole depository system rests on splitting one bundle of rights in two.
Depository shall be deemed to be the registered owner for the purpose of effecting transfer of ownership of security on behalf of a beneficial owner.
Deemed, and for one purpose only. The depository's name sits on the issuer's register so that shares can move by book entry rather than by transfer deed.
And it gets nothing for it: Depository as a registered owner shall not have any voting rights or any other rights in respect of securities held by it.
Everything real stays with the investor: the beneficial owner shall be entitled to all rights and benefits and be subjected to all the liabilities in respect of his securities held by a depository.
Rights and benefits, and liabilities too — the split is not a way of shedding obligations.
How the beneficial owner comes into existence. Every person subscribing to securities shall have the option either to receive or hold securities certificates with a depository, and where he opts for the depository, the issuer shall intimate depository the details of allotment and on receipt of such information, the depository shall enter the name of allottee as the beneficial owner of the security.
And the records are given statutory force: the register and index of beneficial owners maintained by a depository under Section 11... shall be deemed to be the corresponding register and index under the Companies Act.
Two more consequences follow from the split.
Securities become interchangeable — all securities held by a depository shall be dematerialized and shall be in fungible form — so there are no certificate numbers to match.
And the company loses its gatekeeping role — the Act has made the securities of all companies freely transferable in the depository mode, restricting the company's right to use discretion in effecting the transfer of securities, with the other procedural and the transfer deed requirements stated in the Companies Act... dispensed with.
The exit exists too. A beneficial owner who wishes to opt-out informs the depository, which informs the issuer, and the issuer shall issue new certificates to the beneficial owner within thirty days.
One lakh a day to one crore — and the five crore exception
Most of the penalty sections in the Depositories Act repeat the same formula word for word, which makes the one that differs easy to remember.
The common formula: a penalty which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees for each day during which such failure continues subject to a maximum of one crore rupees.
A floor of one lakh, one lakh for every day it goes on, a ceiling of one crore.
It applies to six defaults.
Section 19A — failure to furnish any information, document, books, returns or report to SEBI or filing any return within the time specified thereof, or filing of false, incorrect or incomplete information, return, report, books or other documents; and failure to maintain books of account or records.
Section 19B — failure to enter into an agreement either by an intermediary or any issuer.
Section 19C — failure to address investors' grievances after being asked by SEBI within the given time.
Section 19D — delay in dematerialization or issue of a certificate of securities.
Section 19F — failure to comply by the SEBI directions issued under section 19 of the Depositories Act within a specified time.
And then the exception. Section 19FA — failure to conduct business in a fair manner. Where a depository fails to conduct its business with its participants or any issuer or its agent or any person associated with the securities markets in a fair manner, the penalty is not less than five crore rupees but which may extend to twenty-five crore rupees or three times the amount of gains made out of such failure, whichever is higher.
Fifty times the ordinary floor, and geared to the gain.
The difference is one of kind, not degree. A late return inconveniences the regulator. A depository that deals unfairly with participants, issuers or the market corrupts the infrastructure everyone else is compelled to use.
And above all of it sits section 20 — imprisonment for a term which may extend up to 10 years, or with fine up to Rs. 25 crores, or with both, and without prejudice to any award of penalty by adjudicating officer or SEBI.
Who pays when something goes wrong
The Act settles the investor's remedy in a single sentence, and the design is worth noticing.
When any loss is caused to the beneficial owner due to negligence of the depository or the participant, the depository shall indemnify the beneficial owner.
The depository pays — even when the negligence was the participant's.
And then it recovers: where such loss is indemnified by the depository, it can recover the same from the participant where such loss is due to the negligence of the participant.
Why this way round. The investor deals with a depository participant, but the participant may be small, may have failed, or may dispute the facts. Requiring the investor to identify which link in the chain was negligent before recovering anything would make the remedy worth very little. So the Act puts the loss on the institution best able to bear it and lets the two of them sort out the incidence afterwards.
The same instinct runs through the broking regulations — a trading member shall be responsible for all acts of omission and commission of the Authorised Person.
Note what triggers it: negligence. Not every loss, and not market loss — the section is about failures in the depository system, not investment outcomes.
The rest of the enforcement machinery sits behind it. SEBI may call upon any issuer, depository, depository participant or beneficial owner to furnish information in writing, may authorise an enquiry or inspection, and after it can issue appropriate directions to the depository or participant or any person associated with securities market or to any issuer as may be appropriate in the interest of investors or the securities market.
Including taking back the gain — the power to direct any person who made a profit or averted loss by indulging in any transaction or activity in contravention... to disgorge an amount equivalent to the wrongful gain made or loss averted.
Compensation, direction, disgorgement, penalty and prosecution — five different responses to the same failure.
Forty-five days, sixty days, and what the Supreme Court will hear
The appeal route out of a SEBI order under this Act has two rungs, each with its own clock and its own scope.
To the Securities Appellate Tribunal. Any person aggrieved by an order of the SEBI or Adjudicating Officer (AO) may prefer an appeal to the SAT, and every appeal shall be filed within a period of 45 days from the date on which a copy of the order made by SEBI or AO is received by the aggrieved party.
From receipt, not from the date of the order.
Delay is curable: the SAT may entertain an appeal after the expiry of the said period of 45 days if it is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not filing it within that period.
The Tribunal's powers are full ones: after giving the parties to the appeal an opportunity of being heard, it may pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit, confirming, modifying or setting aside the order appealed against, sending a copy to the SEBI, the parties to the appeal and the concerned AO.
And an appellant need not be a lawyer's client. He may either appear in person or authorize one or more chartered accountants or company secretaries or cost accountants or legal practitioners or any of its officers to present his or its case.
To the Supreme Court. Any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the SAT may file an appeal to the Supreme Court within 60 days from the date of communication of the SAT order to him on any question of law arising out of such order, with a possible extension not exceeding 60 days.
Sixty plus sixty — but only on a question of law.
Which is the important limitation. Whether a participant actually received an instruction, or whether records were actually reconciled, is a question of fact, and the Tribunal is the last word on it. The Supreme Court hears what the law means, not what happened.
A separate route also exists: any person aggrieved by an order of the SEBI made under this Act or the regulations made thereunder may prefer an appeal to the Central Government within such time as may be prescribed.
Compounding and immunity — two ways a case can end early
Neither is an acquittal, and each has a boundary worth knowing.
Compounding. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedures, any offence punishable under this Act, not being an offence punishable with imprisonment only, or with imprisonment and also with fine, may either before or after the institution of any proceeding, be compounded by the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) or a court before which such proceedings are pending.
Note the exclusion carefully — an offence punishable with imprisonment only, or with imprisonment and also with fine, cannot be compounded. Compounding is for offences where a fine alone is a possible outcome.
Timing is flexible — either before or after the institution of any proceeding — and the forum is SAT or a court before which such proceedings are pending.
Immunity. The Central Government may, on recommendation by SEBI and if satisfied, grant immunity from prosecution or penalty to a person, who is alleged to have violated Depositories Act or the rules or regulations made thereunder, if such person has made full and true disclosure of such alleged violation.
Full and true disclosure is the price — partial candour buys nothing.
Three limits. No such immunity may be granted where the prosecution proceedings have already been initiated before the receipt of an application for grant of immunity — so the application must come first. The recommendation of SEBI under this sub-section is not binding upon the Central Government. And the government may also withdraw immunity given to a person if it is satisfied that such person had given false evidence and hence may be tried for the offence.
Immunity granted on a lie is immunity that can be taken away.
Both mechanisms sit against the background of section 20 — imprisonment for a term which may extend up to 10 years, or with fine up to Rs. 25 crores, or with both, for anyone who contravenes or attempts to contravene or abets the contravention, or fails to pay the penalty imposed by the adjudicating officer.
Key terms in this chapter
- Agreement with the depository
- An entity intending to act as a depository participant must enter into an agreement with the depository in the prescribed format. Failure by an intermediary or an issuer to enter into an agreement attracts a penalty under section 19B of not less than one lakh rupees, extending to one lakh rupees for each day the failure continues, subject to a maximum of one crore rupees.
- Appeal to the Securities Appellate Tribunal
- Any person aggrieved by an order of SEBI or of an adjudicating officer may appeal to SAT within forty-five days from the date a copy of the order is received, in the prescribed form and with the prescribed fee, SAT being able to entertain a later appeal where satisfied there was sufficient cause for the delay. After giving the parties an opportunity of being heard, SAT may pass such orders as it thinks fit, confirming, modifying or setting aside the order appealed against, and sends a copy of every order to SEBI, the parties and the concerned adjudicating officer. The appellant may appear in person or authorise one or more chartered accountants, company secretaries, cost accountants, legal practitioners or its own officers to present the case. A person aggrieved by a SEBI order under the Act may also prefer an appeal to the Central Government within the prescribed time.
- Appeal to the Supreme Court
- Any person aggrieved by a decision or order of SAT may appeal to the Supreme Court within sixty days from the date the SAT order is communicated to him, on any question of law arising out of that order, and the Supreme Court may if satisfied allow the appeal to be filed within a further period not exceeding sixty days.
- Beneficial owner
- The beneficial owner is entitled to all the rights and benefits, and is subject to all the liabilities, in respect of the securities held for him by a depository. Ownership therefore stays economically and legally with the investor while the depository's name appears on the register purely to enable transfers.
- Composition of offences
- Notwithstanding the Code of Criminal Procedure, any offence punishable under the Act, other than one punishable with imprisonment only or with imprisonment and also with fine, may be compounded either before or after the institution of any proceeding, by the Securities Appellate Tribunal or by the court before which the proceedings are pending.
- Dematerialised and fungible form
- All securities held by a depository must be dematerialised and in fungible form, so that individual holdings are not distinguished by certificate numbers and ownership can move by book entry. The register and index of beneficial owners maintained by a depository under section 11 of the Depositories Act is deemed to be the corresponding register and index under the Companies Act.
- Enquiry and inspection
- SEBI may call upon any issuer, depository, depository participant or beneficial owner to furnish information in writing relating to securities held in a depository, and may itself make or authorise any person to make an enquiry or inspection into the affairs of the issuer, beneficial owner or depository participant, the report being submitted within the period SEBI specifies. Every director, partner, manager, officer, employee or secretary of the depository, beneficial owner, issuer or participant must produce all information and documents required by the person conducting the enquiry or inspection.
- IFSC carve-out
- The International Finance Securities Centre Authority Act, 2019 read with section 23G of the Depositories Act clarifies that SEBI's powers under the Depositories Act do not extend to International Financial Services Centres set up under section 18(1) of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005. Those powers are exercisable there by the International Financial Services Centres Authority established under section 4(1) of the IFSCA Act, so far as the regulation of financial products, financial services and financial institutions permitted in an IFSC is concerned.
- Indemnity for negligence
- Where loss is caused to a beneficial owner by the negligence of the depository or of a participant, the depository must indemnify the beneficial owner. Where the depository has so indemnified a loss caused by the participant's negligence, it may recover that amount from the participant. The investor therefore has one certain remedy and need not establish where in the chain the failure occurred.
- Opting out of a depository
- A beneficial owner wishing to opt out of a depository in respect of any security informs the depository, which makes the appropriate entries in its records and informs the issuer. The issuer, on fulfilment of all conditions under the regulations by the depository, must issue new certificates to the beneficial owner within thirty days of receiving that information from the depository.
- Option to hold in a depository
- Every person subscribing to securities has the option either to receive security certificates or to hold them with a depository. Where the person opts for the depository, the issuer intimates the depository of the details of the allotment, and on receipt of that information the depository enters the name of the allottee as the beneficial owner of the security.
- Power to grant immunity
- The Central Government may, on the recommendation of SEBI and if satisfied, grant immunity from prosecution or penalty to a person alleged to have violated the Depositories Act or the rules or regulations made under it, provided that person has made full and true disclosure of the alleged violation. No immunity may be granted where prosecution proceedings were already initiated before receipt of the application; SEBI's recommendation does not bind the Central Government; and the government may withdraw immunity where satisfied that the person gave false evidence, in which case he may be tried for the offence.
- Power to issue directions and to order disgorgement
- After making or causing an enquiry, SEBI may issue appropriate directions to a depository, participant, any person associated with the securities market or any issuer, as appropriate in the interest of investors or the securities market. That power is declared to include, and always to have included, the power to direct any person who made a profit or averted a loss by a transaction or activity in contravention of the Act or the regulations to disgorge an amount equivalent to the wrongful gain made or loss averted.
- Purpose of the Depositories Act, 1996
- It provides for the establishment of depositories in securities to ensure free transferability of securities with speed, accuracy and security, by making securities freely transferable subject to certain exceptions, by dematerialising securities in the depository mode, and by providing for the maintenance of ownership records in book-entry form. To streamline settlement the Act envisages transfer of ownership of securities electronically by book entry; it has made the securities of all companies freely transferable in the depository mode, restricting the company's discretion in effecting transfers, and has dispensed with the other procedural and transfer deed requirements of the Companies Act.
- Registered owner
- The depository is deemed to be the registered owner for the purpose of effecting the transfer of ownership of a security on behalf of a beneficial owner. As registered owner, however, the depository has no voting rights and no other rights in respect of the securities it holds.
- Registration of transfers and custody
- Every depository must, on receipt of intimation from a participant, register the transfer of a security in the name of the transferee. If a beneficial owner or a transferee of any security seeks to have custody of that security, the depository must inform the issuer accordingly. The depository must also inform the issuer about transfers of securities in the names of beneficial owners at the intervals and in the manner prescribed by its bye-laws.
- Section 19A penalty
- Failure to furnish any information, document, books, returns or report to SEBI, or to file any return within the specified time, or the filing of false, incorrect or incomplete information, returns, reports, books or other documents, and separately failure to maintain books of account or records, each attracts a penalty of not less than one lakh rupees, which may extend to one lakh rupees for each day during which the failure continues, subject to a maximum of one crore rupees.
- Section 19FA — failure to conduct business fairly
- Where a depository fails to conduct its business with its participants, any issuer or its agent, or any person associated with the securities markets in a fair manner in accordance with the rules, regulations or directions issued by SEBI under the Act, it is liable to a penalty of not less than five crore rupees, which may extend to twenty-five crore rupees or three times the amount of gains made out of such failure, whichever is higher.
- Section 20 — offences
- Without prejudice to any penalty awarded by an adjudicating officer or SEBI, any person who contravenes, attempts to contravene or abets the contravention of the Depositories Act or the rules, regulations or bye-laws made under it, or fails to pay a penalty imposed by the adjudicating officer or to comply with any of his directions or orders, is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend up to ten years, or with a fine up to Rs. 25 crore, or with both.
- Sections 19B, 19C, 19D and 19F penalties
- Each carries the same formula — not less than one lakh rupees, extending to one lakh rupees for each day of continuance, subject to a maximum of one crore rupees. Section 19B applies to failure by an intermediary or issuer to enter into an agreement; section 19C to failure by a depository, participant, issuer, its agents or an intermediary to address investors' grievances after being asked by SEBI within the time given; section 19D to delay in dematerialisation or issue of a certificate of securities; and section 19F to failure to comply with SEBI's directions issued under section 19 within the specified time.
Check you have understood it
The L1 test for this chapter has 9 questions. Score 60% to unlock L2 Application (worked numericals and scenarios) and then L3 Exam-Ready (NISM-style traps, timed, with this paper's real marking). Tests, the higher levels and full mock exams need a free account so we can track your progress.
Create a free accountOriginal explanatory writing based on the official NISM workbook for Series III-A, which is published and copyrighted by NISM. Check figures against the current edition at nism.ac.in.