All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

NISM Series VIII · Chapter 1: Basics of Derivatives

L1 · Foundation

Basics of Derivatives — the ground floor

What a derivative actually is, the four product types, eight centuries of history, how India got here committee by committee, who trades and why, exchange-traded versus OTC, what the market is for, and the six risks.

13 min read · Worth 10% of the paper · Written from pages 12–18 of the official NISM workbook · Updated 18 September 2026

One sentence, then everything else

A derivative is a contract or a product whose value is derived from the value of some other asset, known as the underlying.

That is the whole idea. The derivative has no independent worth. It borrows its value from something else, and when that something else moves, the derivative moves with it.

The workbook lists the underlyings in four groups:

GroupExamples
MetalsGold, Silver, Aluminium, Copper, Zinc, Nickel, Tin, Lead
Energy resourcesOil (crude oil, products, cracks), Coal, Electricity, Natural Gas
Agri commoditiesWheat, Sugar, Coffee, Cotton, Pulses
Financial assetsShares, Bonds and Foreign Exchange

Series VIII is about the last row — specifically equity derivatives. But the exam will still ask you what else can be an underlying, so read that table twice.

Eight centuries of the same idea

Derivatives feel modern. They are not. The workbook's timeline runs a long way back, and the dates are directly examinable.

WhenWhat happened
12th centuryAt European trade fairs, sellers signed contracts promising future delivery of the items they sold
13th centuryEnglish Cistercian Monasteries frequently sold their wool up to 20 years in advance to foreign merchants
1634–1637Tulip Mania in Holland — fortunes were lost after a speculative boom in tulip futures burst
Late 17th centuryIn Japan, at Dojima near Osaka, a futures market in rice developed to protect rice producers from bad weather or warfare
1848The Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) facilitated trading of forward contracts on various commodities
1865CBOT listed the first exchange-traded derivative contract in the US — called futures contracts
1919The Chicago Butter and Egg Board, a spin-off of CBOT, was reorganised to allow futures trading; later renamed the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME)
1972CME introduced the International Monetary Market (IMM), allowing trading in currency futures
1973The Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) became the first marketplace for trading listed options
1975CBOT introduced the Treasury bill futures contract — the first successful pure interest rate futures
1977CBOT introduced the T-bond futures contract
1982CME introduced the Eurodollar futures contract
1982The Kansas City Board of Trade launched the first stock index futures
1983CBOE introduced options on stock indices with the S&P 100 (OEX) and S&P 500 (SPX) indices

Three sequencing facts hide in that table and get tested. Forwards came before futures at CBOT — 1848 then 1865. Currency futures (1972) came before listed options (1973). And stock index futures (1982, Kansas City) came before stock index options (1983, CBOE) — futures first, options after, in that order.

Why the market exploded

Over the last five decades, the derivatives market has seen phenomenal growth. The workbook names five drivers:

  • Increased fluctuations in underlying asset prices in financial markets
  • Integration of financial markets globally
  • Use of latest technology in communications, which has helped reduce transaction costs
  • Enhanced understanding by market participants of sophisticated risk management tools
  • Frequent innovations in the derivatives market and newer applications of products

Notice they are not all demand-side. Two are about need (volatility, global integration), one about cost (technology), one about knowledge, and one about supply of products.

How India got here

This section is a sequence of committees, an amendment and a set of launch dates. Every one of them is a potential question.

18 November 1996 — SEBI set up a 24-member committee under the chairmanship of Dr. L. C. Gupta to develop an appropriate regulatory framework for derivatives trading in India.

17 March 1998 — the Gupta committee submitted its report, recommending that derivatives should be declared as "securities", so that the regulatory framework applicable to the trading of securities could also govern the trading of derivatives.

June 1998 — SEBI set up a group under the chairmanship of Prof. J. R. Varma to recommend measures for risk containment in the derivatives market.

October 1998 — the Varma committee submitted its report. It worked out the operational details of the margining system, the methodology for charging initial margins, membership details and net-worth criterion, deposit requirements and real-time monitoring of positions requirements.

1999 — the Securities Contract (Regulation) Act (SCRA) was amended to include "derivatives" within the domain of "securities", and a regulatory framework was developed for governing derivatives trading.

March 2000 — the government repealed a three-decade-old notification which had prohibited forward trading in securities.

June 2000 — exchange-traded derivatives started in India, with SEBI permitting BSE and NSE to introduce the equity derivatives segment. The first products approved were index futures contracts based on Nifty and Sensex.

Then the product launches, in this exact order:

ProductLaunch
Index futuresJune 2000
Index optionsJune 2001
Options on individual stocksJuly 2001
Futures on individual stocksNovember 2001

February 2013 — Metropolitan Stock Exchange of India Limited (MSEI) started trading in derivative products.

Read that launch order once more, because it is deliberately counter-intuitive. In India, stock options came BEFORE stock futures — July 2001 before November 2001. For indices it was the other way round: futures first (2000), options later (2001). Candidates who assume "futures always before options" get one of the two wrong.

The four products

Forwards. A contractual agreement between two parties to buy or sell an underlying asset at a certain future date for a price pre-decided on the date of the contract. Both parties are committed and obliged to honour the transaction irrespective of the price of the underlying at the time of delivery. Because they are negotiated between two parties, the terms are customised. These are over-the-counter (OTC) contracts.

Futures. Similar to a forward, except that the deal is made through an organised and regulated exchange rather than being negotiated directly between two parties. Futures are standardised — lot size, maturity date and so on — so that they can be traded on the exchange. The workbook's own summary: futures are exchange-traded forward contracts.

Options. A contract that gives the right, but not an obligation, to buy or sell the underlying on or before a stated date and at a stated price. The buyer pays the premium and buys the right; the writer/seller receives the premium with the obligation to sell or buy the underlying if the buyer exercises his right.

Swaps. An agreement made between two parties to exchange cash flows in the future according to a prearranged formula. Broadly speaking, swaps are a series of forward contracts. They help participants manage risks associated with volatile interest rates, currency exchange rates and commodity prices.

That "series of forward contracts" line is the most useful thing to remember about swaps at this level — a swap is not a fifth kind of animal, it is many forwards stacked in a row.

Who is in this market

Broadly three types of participants — and one sentence that catches people out: an individual may play different roles in different market circumstances. Hedger, trader and arbitrageur are roles, not licences. The same person can be all three in a week.

Hedgers face risk associated with the prices of underlying assets and use derivatives to reduce their risk. Corporations, investing institutions and banks all use derivative products to hedge or reduce exposure to market variables such as interest rates, share prices, bond prices, currency exchange rates and commodity prices.

Speculators / traders try to predict future movements in prices of underlying assets and take positions in derivative contracts based on that view. Why do they use derivatives rather than the underlying itself? Three reasons, all named:

  • they offer leverage
  • they are less expensive — the cost of transaction is generally lower than that of the underlying
  • they are faster to execute in size, being a high-volume market

Arbitrageurs. Arbitrage is a deal that produces profit by exploiting a price difference in a product in two different markets. It originates when a trader purchases an asset cheaply in one location and simultaneously arranges to sell it at a higher price in another location. Such opportunities are unlikely to persist for very long, because arbitrageurs rush in and close the price gap.

Two kinds of market

Derivatives are either traded on organised exchanges (exchange-traded derivatives) or agreed directly between the contracting counterparties over the telephone or through electronic media (over-the-counter, or OTC, derivatives). A few complex products are constructed on simple building blocks like forwards, futures, options and swaps to meet specific customer requirements.

Here is the sentence worth quoting: the over-the-counter market is not a physical marketplace but a collection of broker-dealers scattered across the country. The main idea of the market is more a way of doing business than a place. Buying and selling are matched through a negotiated bidding process over a network of telephone or electronic media linking thousands of intermediaries.

Who is in the OTC market? Banks, financial institutions and sophisticated market participants like hedge funds, corporations and high net-worth individuals.

And why is it lightly regulated? Because these transactions occur in private among qualified counterparties, who are supposed to be capable enough to take care of themselves.

The five features of OTC derivatives, compared with exchange-traded ones:

  • Contracts are tailor made to fit the specific requirements of the dealing counterparties
  • The management of counterparty (credit) risk is decentralised and located within individual institutions
  • There are no formal centralised limits on individual positions, leverage or margining
  • There are no formal rules or mechanisms for risk management to ensure market stability and integrity, or to safeguard the collective interest of participants
  • Transactions are private, with little or no disclosure to the entire market

On the contrary, exchange-traded contracts are standardised, traded on organised exchanges, with prices determined by the interaction of buyers and sellers through an anonymous auction platform. A clearing corporation guarantees contract performance — the settlement of transactions.

That last clause is the single biggest structural difference. In OTC, each institution manages its own counterparty risk. On an exchange, a clearing corporation stands in the middle and guarantees performance.

What the market is actually for

The workbook gives three specific functions:

  • It helps in improving price discovery based on actual valuations and expectations.
  • It enables the transfer of various risks from those who are exposed to risk but have a low risk appetite to participants with a high risk appetite. As the workbook puts it: hedgers want to give away the risk whereas traders are willing to take risk.
  • It enables the shift of speculative trades from the unorganised market to the organised market. The risk management mechanism and surveillance of participants' activities in the organised space provide stability to the financial system.

That third point is often misread. The market's contribution is not that it eliminates speculation. It is that speculation which would happen anyway is moved into a supervised space where it can be margined, monitored and contained.

The risks

Derivatives are leveraged instruments, and the workbook lists the risks plainly:

RiskWhat it is
Counterparty riskDefault by the counterparty
Price riskLoss on a position because of a price move
Liquidity riskInability to exit from a position
Legal or regulatory riskEnforceability of contracts
Operational riskFraud, inadequate documentation, improper execution, and the like

And then a caution that is itself examinable: derivatives may not be an appropriate avenue for someone of limited resources, or having limited trading experience, or with low risk tolerance. A participant should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for him or her based on these parameters.

The Model Risk Disclosure Document

Participants who trade in derivatives are advised to carefully read the Model Risk Disclosure Document, given by the broker to his clients at the time of signing the agreement.

The document is issued by the members of Exchanges and contains important information on trading in the Equities and F&O segments of exchanges. All prospective participants should read this document before trading on the Capital Market / Cash Segment or the F&O segment of the exchanges.

Three details to hold: who issues it (members of exchanges — that is, brokers, not SEBI and not the exchange itself), when it is given (at the time of signing the agreement), and what it covers (both the equities and the F&O segments, not F&O alone).

Think of it like this

A derivative is the wedding-hall advance, not the hall

Book a marriage hall in Coimbatore for next December and you pay an advance to lock the rate. What you now hold is not a hall. It is a piece of paper whose worth depends entirely on what halls cost in December.

If hall rates double, your paper is valuable — you can hold a wedding for half what your neighbour pays. If a new hall opens next door and rates collapse, your paper is worth less than you paid for it. The paper never had a value of its own. It derives its value from the hall.

That is exactly the workbook's definition: a contract or product whose value is derived from the value of some other asset, known as the underlying.

And it explains why the underlying list is so wide. Anything with a price that moves and a future date attached can carry a derivative on top of it — gold, crude oil, wheat, shares, bonds, foreign exchange. The hall is incidental. The mechanism is universal.

The OTC market is a scrap-metal bazaar; the exchange is a supermarket

Walk into a scrap-metal lane in Old Delhi. There is no counter, no price board, no single owner. There are dozens of dealers, each negotiating a different deal on the phone. Every transaction is shaped to the two people making it — grade, quantity, delivery, credit terms. Nobody else knows what price you got.

That is the OTC market, and the workbook describes it almost that way: not a physical marketplace but a collection of broker-dealers scattered across the country — more a way of doing business than a place.

Notice what the lane cannot give you. If your buyer disappears, that is your problem — counterparty risk management is decentralised and sits inside each institution. There is no central limit on how much any dealer may take on. And nobody outside your deal knows it happened.

A supermarket is the other model. Fixed packs, printed prices, one queue, one till. That is the exchange: standardised contracts, an anonymous auction platform, and a clearing corporation that guarantees performance. You never ask whether the person on the other side of your trade is good for the money, because you are not really trading with them at all.

The bazaar is not lawless because nobody cares. It is lightly regulated because the participants are qualified counterparties who are supposed to be capable enough to take care of themselves — banks, financial institutions, hedge funds, corporations, HNIs. Retail is not in that lane.

Hedger, trader and arbitrageur are three seats on the same bus

A cotton mill owner in Erode sells cotton futures in March to lock the price of the crop he must buy in June. That week he is a hedger — he owns the risk already and wants to give it away.

In April he reads that monsoon forecasts are poor, takes a long position in cotton futures with no underlying exposure at all, and hopes to profit. That week he is a trader — he did not have the risk; he went out and bought it.

In May his broker points out that the same contract is a rupee cheaper on one exchange than another. He buys on one and sells on the other simultaneously. That week he is an arbitrageur — he wants no view on cotton at all, only the gap.

Same person, same market, three different seats. The workbook says it directly: an individual may play different roles in different market circumstances.

And the seats need each other. Hedgers want to give away the risk whereas traders are willing to take risk — without somebody willing to sit in the trader's seat, the hedger has nobody to sell to. The arbitrageur's job is different again: he keeps the prices in the two markets honest.

A swap is a year of forwards, stapled together

Your society hires a water tanker. Instead of haggling over the price every fortnight for a year, you sign one agreement: on the 1st and 15th of every month for twelve months, we exchange one tanker for a fixed ₹1,800 — whatever the going rate is that day.

You have not invented a new kind of contract. You have written twenty-four forward contracts on one sheet of paper, each with its own date and the same price.

That is why the workbook says swaps are, broadly speaking, a series of forward contracts. The prearranged formula replaces twenty-four separate negotiations, and what you exchange is cash flows in the future.

It also explains what swaps are used for: managing risks associated with volatile interest rates, currency exchange rates and commodity prices — precisely the situations where you face the same exposure repeatedly, month after month, rather than once.

Moving speculation onto the exchange is like moving the betting ring into a stadium

People are going to bet on cricket whether or not anyone approves. The question is where.

In a back lane there is no record of who owes what, no limit on how much anyone can stake, nobody checking that the winner actually gets paid, and no way for an outsider to see trouble building.

Move the same activity into a licensed, supervised venue and the activity has not stopped — but now there are stake limits, deposits, records and someone watching. When one participant gets dangerously overextended, it is visible before it becomes everyone's problem.

That is the workbook's third function of the derivatives market: it enables the shift of speculative trades from the unorganized market to the organized market, and the risk management mechanism and surveillance of activities of various participants in the organized space provide stability to the financial system.

The point candidates miss on this one: the benefit claimed is not that speculation is reduced. It is that speculation becomes margined, monitored and containable.

Key terms in this chapter

Arbitrage
A deal that produces profit by exploiting a price difference in a product in two different markets. Such opportunities close quickly as arbitrageurs rush in.
Arbitrageur
A participant who buys an asset cheaply in one market and simultaneously sells it at a higher price in another, profiting from the price difference.
Clearing corporation
The entity that guarantees contract performance — the settlement of transactions — in an exchange-traded derivatives market.
Counterparty risk
The risk of default by the counterparty to a contract.
Derivative
A contract or product whose value is derived from the value of some other asset, called the underlying.
Exchange-traded derivative
A standardised derivative traded on an organised exchange, with prices set by an anonymous auction platform and a clearing corporation guaranteeing performance.
Forward contract
A customised OTC agreement between two parties to buy or sell an underlying at a future date at a price decided today. Both parties are obliged to honour it whatever the price at delivery.
Futures contract
A standardised forward contract made through an organised and regulated exchange rather than negotiated directly between two parties.
Hedger
A participant who already faces price risk on an underlying asset and uses derivatives to reduce that risk.
J. R. Varma Committee
The SEBI group set up in June 1998 that reported in October 1998 on risk containment — margining, initial margins, net-worth criterion, deposits and real-time position monitoring.
L. C. Gupta Committee
The 24-member SEBI committee set up on 18 November 1996 that reported on 17 March 1998, recommending derivatives be declared as securities.
Legal or regulatory risk
The risk arising from the enforceability of contracts.
Leverage
Getting market exposure far larger than the money committed. One of the three reasons traders prefer derivatives over the underlying asset.
Liquidity risk
The risk of being unable to exit from a position.
Model Risk Disclosure Document
A document issued by members of exchanges, given by the broker to clients at the time of signing the agreement, containing important information on trading in the Equities and F&O segments.
Operational risk
Risk of loss from fraud, inadequate documentation, improper execution and similar internal failures.
Option
A contract giving the right, but not an obligation, to buy or sell the underlying on or before a stated date at a stated price. The buyer pays a premium; the writer takes the obligation.
Over-the-counter (OTC) derivative
A derivative agreed directly between counterparties by telephone or electronic media. Tailor made, privately dealt, with decentralised counterparty risk and no formal centralised limits.
Price discovery
The market process of arriving at a price based on actual valuations and expectations. Improving it is one of the three functions of the derivatives market.
Price risk
The risk of loss on a position because of a move in the price of the underlying.
Securities Contract (Regulation) Act (SCRA)
The Act amended in 1999 to include derivatives within the domain of securities, giving derivatives trading its legal framework in India.
Speculator (trader)
A participant who predicts future price movements and takes derivative positions on that view, without any underlying exposure.
Swap
An agreement between two parties to exchange cash flows in the future according to a prearranged formula. Broadly speaking, a series of forward contracts.
Underlying
The asset from which a derivative takes its value — metals, energy resources, agri commodities or financial assets such as shares, bonds and foreign exchange.

Check you have understood it

The L1 test for this chapter has 8 questions. Score 60% to unlock L2 Application (worked numericals and scenarios) and then L3 Exam-Ready (NISM-style traps, timed, with this paper's real marking). Tests, the higher levels and full mock exams need a free account so we can track your progress.

Create a free account

Original explanatory writing based on the official NISM workbook for Series VIII, which is published and copyrighted by NISM. Check figures against the current edition at nism.ac.in.

Something look wrong? Report it