NISM Professor

Derivative

Also written Derivatives · Derivative contract · Derivative product

A contract whose value is derived from the value of something else — the underlying — rather than from anything the contract itself owns or produces.

In plain language

A share is worth something because it is a slice of a company. A bond is worth something because somebody owes you money. A derivative owns nothing and lends nothing. It is a contract, and its price moves only because the price of the thing it refers to moves.

That referenced thing is the underlying. It can be a metal (gold, silver, copper), an energy resource (crude oil, coal, natural gas, electricity), an agricultural commodity (wheat, sugar, cotton), or a financial asset — shares, bonds, an index, or foreign exchange.

Four building blocks cover almost everything: forwards, futures, options and swaps. More complex products are assembled from those four.

How it works

The four products differ on two axes — who is obliged, and where it trades.

  • A forward is a private, customised agreement between two parties to buy or sell at a price fixed today. Both sides are obliged. It is OTC.
  • A future is the same obligation, standardised in lot size and maturity and traded on an exchange, with a clearing corporation guaranteeing settlement. The workbook's phrasing: futures are exchange traded forwards.
  • An option gives the buyer a right and no obligation; the writer has the obligation and keeps the premium.
  • A swap is an agreement to exchange cash flows on a prearranged formula — in effect a series of forwards.

Three kinds of participant use them. Hedgers hold an exposure and want rid of it. Speculators hold a view and want leverage. Arbitrageurs exploit a price difference between two markets and, by doing so, close it.

The Indian regulatory path is examinable in dates. SEBI appointed the L C Gupta committee on 18 November 1996; it reported on 17 March 1998, recommending that derivatives be declared securities. The J R Varma group was set up in June 1998 and reported in October 1998 on risk containment and margining. The SCRA was amended in 1999 to bring derivatives within "securities". Exchange-traded derivatives began in June 2000 with index futures on Nifty and Sensex; index options in June 2001, stock options in July 2001, stock futures in November 2001. MSEI started in February 2013.

A worked example

Take the same market view three ways, on 3 October 2025, when Nifty spot is 24,894.25 and the near-month Nifty future is 25,006.60, at a lot size of 25.

Buy the index itself. To get Rs 6.25 lakh of exposure you commit roughly Rs 6,25,000 of your own money.

Buy one futures contract.

Contract value = 25,006.60 × 25 = Rs 6,25,165
Initial margin at 10%          = Rs   62,517

You control Rs 6.25 lakh of index for Rs 62,517. If the index rises 1%, the contract gains roughly Rs 6,250 — about 10% on the margin. If it falls 1%, you lose the same 10%, and the loss is collected the same evening.

Buy one call option. You pay a premium and nothing else. The most you can lose is that premium; the upside is open.

All three positions have the same underlying and wildly different risk. The derivative did not create the index exposure — it repackaged it, which is precisely why the workbook insists that leverage is a double-edged sword.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 13 (Basics of Derivatives) is short and almost entirely factual, which makes it a reliable source of easy marks: the definition, the four products, the three participant types, the ETD-versus-OTC comparison, the list of risks, and the committee-and-date chronology above. Chapter 19 repeats the framework for interest rate derivatives. Expect at least one date or committee-name question and one "which of these is not a derivative product" question.

Common exam traps

  • Forwards and futures are not synonyms. Forwards are customised, OTC and carry counterparty risk; futures are standardised, exchange-traded and guaranteed by a clearing corporation.
  • A derivative is a security in India. That was the point of the 1999 SCRA amendment — it is why SEBI, not some separate regulator, governs the segment.
  • OTC is less regulated, not unregulated. The workbook's list is specific: no centralised position limits, decentralised counterparty risk management, private transactions with little disclosure.
  • Do not confuse price risk with counterparty risk. Exchange trading removes the second, not the first.
  • Arbitrage opportunities do not persist. Any question implying a risk-free profit that lasts is testing whether you know arbitrageurs close the gap.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series I

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it