All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

AMFI Code of Ethics

Also written ACE · AMFI Code of Ethics (ACE)

AMFI's code of good practice for AMCs and trustees, drawn up to supplement the SEBI code of conduct in the Fourth Schedule and set more explicit standards, from integrity to enforcement.

In plain language

SEBI's mutual fund regulations already require every Asset Management Company and trustee to follow a Code of Conduct in the Fourth Schedule to the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 2026. That code lays down broad principles.

The AMFI Code of Ethics (ACE) sits on top of it. The workbook: it sets out the standards of good practices to be followed by the Asset Management Companies in their operations and in their dealings with investors, intermediaries and the public. It was drawn up to supplement that schedule, to encourage standards higher than those prescribed by the Regulations, and sets more explicit standards for AMCs and Trustees.

How it works

The ten sections, in order.

#SectionExamples of what it requires
1IntegritySchemes run in the interest of all classes of unit-holders — not sponsors, directors, trustees, brokers, associates, or a special class of unit-holders
2Due diligenceHigh service standards, independent professional judgement, adequate resources
3DisclosuresPortfolio details, expense ratios and portfolio turnover annually; deals with associates or significant unit-holders reported to trustees with a fairness justification; key personnel's trades disclosed to the compliance officer at least half-yearly
4Professional selling practicesNo exaggerated performance claims; do not present a scheme as a new share issue; no guaranteed returns except as stated in the SID
5Investment practicesManage schemes per the SID's fundamental investment objectives and policies; no buying or selling with the AMC's or trustee company's directors, officers or employees
6OperationsNo front running, no self-dealing; no false markets or price rigging; no change in fundamental attributes without prior unit-holder approval except when caused by regulation; avoid excessive concentration with a broker
7Reporting practicesStandardised valuation; uniform performance reporting on total return; scheme-wise segregation of cash and securities
8Unfair competitionNothing harmful to other members
9Observance of statutesLetter and spirit
10EnforcementCode a condition of employment; each employee signs for it; a designated compliance person; half-yearly and annual reports to trustees; records kept at least three years

Definitions (section 11). A significant unit-holder is any entity holding 5 percent or more of the total corpus of a scheme, including entities it controls. Front running is dealing ahead of the fund with non-public, material information; self-dealing is using one's position to benefit unfairly at the expense of the fund.

A difference to notice. ACE 6.7 speaks of prior approval of unit-holders for a change in fundamental attributes. The SEBI provisions in Chapters 5 and 10 instead require written communication and an exit option at NAV without exit load. Know which document says which.

A worked example

A debt scheme has a corpus of Rs 800 crore. Figures are illustrative; the rules are ACE's.

Significant unit-holder. A corporate treasury holds Rs 44 crore in the scheme, and a subsidiary it controls holds another Rs 6 crore.

Combined holding = 44 + 6 = Rs 50 crore
Share of corpus  = 50 ÷ 800 = 6.25%   (threshold: 5% = Rs 40 crore)

It is a significant unit-holder — the subsidiary counts because it is controlled.

A transaction with it. The scheme buys Rs 25 crore of commercial paper issued by that same company. Under ACE 3.3 the AMC must submit the details to the Board of Trustees with a justification of fairness to the scheme, and disclose the transaction in brief in the annual and half-yearly reports.

A fund manager's own trade. The scheme's dealer buys shares personally. Under ACE 3.4 it goes to the compliance officer at least half-yearly, and on to the trustees if it conflicts with the fund's transactions. Had he bought a bond just before placing the scheme's large order for it, that would be front running.

All of it must be kept on record for at least three years.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 10.3.1 (AMFI Code of Ethics) reproduces the code in full. Expect questions on who it applies to (AMCs and trustees, not distributors), what it supplements (the SEBI Code of Conduct in the Fourth Schedule), the 5 percent significant unit-holder definition, three-year record keeping, half-yearly reporting to trustees, and the definitions of front running and self-dealing.

Common exam traps

  • ACE binds AMCs and trustees; AGNI binds intermediaries.
  • ACE supplements the Fourth Schedule code; it does not replace it, and it aims higher than the regulations.
  • Significant unit-holder: 5 percent or more of the corpus, counting controlled entities.
  • Records: at least three years. Reports to trustees: half-yearly and annually.
  • Performance is reported on a total return basis.
  • ACE 6.7 says prior unit-holder approval for fundamental attribute changes; the SEBI rule in Chapter 10 is notice plus a no-load exit option.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series V-D

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it