NISM Professor

Unit capital

Also written Units and Unit Capital

The number of units a mutual fund scheme has issued multiplied by their face value — an accounting figure that records what investors contributed, not what their holding is worth today.

In plain language

When you put money into a mutual fund you are not handed shares of anything. You are given units, and you become a unit holder. Each unit has a face value, typically Rs 10.

Multiply the units in issue by that face value and you have the scheme's unit capital. It is the mutual fund equivalent of a company's paid-up share capital: a bookkeeping record of the capital subscribed, sitting on the liabilities side of the scheme's balance sheet.

The reason it confuses beginners is that it looks like a value but is not one. What your holding is worth is units × Net Asset Value, and NAV moves every business day. Unit capital only changes when units are created or extinguished — when somebody buys in, or redeems out.

How it works

Take the workbook's own illustration. Three investors put in Rs 10,000, Rs 20,000 and Rs 30,000 — a pool of Rs 60,000, in the proportion 1:2:3. Buying at face value of Rs 10, they receive 1,000, 2,000 and 3,000 units.

Unit capital = (1,000 + 2,000 + 3,000) × Rs 10 = Rs 60,000

The fund invests the Rs 60,000 in shares, which rise to Rs 72,000. Dividend income of Rs 3,000 comes in; Rs 600 of expenses go out. Net assets are Rs 74,400, so NAV is 74,400 ÷ 6,000 = Rs 12.40.

Unit capital is still Rs 60,000. Nothing about the portfolio's performance touched it. The Rs 14,400 of gain sits in the scheme's reserves, and the investors see it in the NAV.

This is also why fresh purchases and redemptions must be priced at NAV, not at face value. The workbook works all four cases. If a new investor buys 1,000 units at the face value of Rs 10, net assets become Rs 84,400 across 7,000 units and NAV falls from Rs 12.40 to Rs 12.05 — the existing unit holders have been robbed to subsidise the entrant. Buy the same 1,000 units at the NAV of Rs 12.40 and net assets become Rs 86,800 across 7,000 units: NAV unchanged. Symmetrically, an exiting investor paid face value would raise NAV to Rs 12.88 at the fund's expense. Pricing at NAV is what keeps entering, staying and exiting investors on equal terms.

The formula

Unit capital = Units outstanding × Face value per unit (typically Rs 10)

Net assets   = Market value of portfolio + income accrued − expenses
NAV per unit = Net assets ÷ Units outstanding

Unit capital changes only when units are issued or redeemed. Net assets change every day.

A worked example

An open-ended equity scheme has 6 crore units of face value Rs 10 outstanding.

Unit capital = 6,00,00,000 × Rs 10 = Rs 60 crore

After three years the portfolio, net of expenses, is worth Rs 111.6 crore. NAV is 111.6 crore ÷ 6 crore = Rs 18.60.

Amount
Unit capitalRs 60.0 crore
Reserves (accumulated gains)Rs 51.6 crore
Net assets / AUMRs 111.6 crore
Units outstanding6.00 crore
NAV per unitRs 18.60

Now a new investor brings in Rs 9,30,000 at the prevailing NAV of Rs 18.60, receiving 50,000 units.

  • Units outstanding rise to 6.00005 crore
  • Unit capital rises by 50,000 × Rs 10 = Rs 5,00,000, to Rs 60.05 crore
  • Net assets rise by the full Rs 9,30,000
  • NAV stays at Rs 18.60

Note what happened: the unit capital went up by Rs 5 lakh while the money that came in was Rs 9.30 lakh. The Rs 4.30 lakh difference is a share of the reserves the new investor bought into. That gap is the whole reason unit capital is an accounting number and never a valuation.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 5 (Mutual Funds), section 5.2 (Terms and Concepts Related to Mutual Funds), under "Units and Unit Capital" — immediately after pooling and proportionate representation, and immediately before marking to market and NAV. The workbook's Rs 60,000 illustration runs straight through all of them, so a question on any one of the four tends to be answerable from the same worked example. Expect a direct computation — "6,000 units of face value Rs 10, what is the unit capital?" — and conceptual questions on why transactions must be priced at NAV rather than face value.

Common exam traps

  • Unit capital is not assets under management. AUM is the market value of the portfolio; unit capital is units × Rs 10. For any scheme that has ever made money, AUM is the larger number.
  • Face value is an accounting convention, not a price. You buy units at NAV. The Rs 10 matters for computing unit capital and nothing else. A scheme whose NAV is Rs 18.60 does not "cost Rs 10".
  • A low NAV does not make a fund cheap. Two funds with identical portfolios can show NAVs of Rs 11 and Rs 250 depending only on how long each has been running. Beginners buy the low-NAV fund thinking they get more units, which is exactly the mistake this section is written to prevent.
  • Unit capital moves on purchases and redemptions, never on market movement. Marking the portfolio to market changes NAV, not unit capital.
  • Contributions to unit capital are capital, not a loan. The fund has no obligation to return a fixed amount, which is also why a mutual fund cannot assure a return.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series V-B

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it