All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Category-I FPI

Also written Category I foreign portfolio investor · Category I foreign portfolio investors

The first of the two classes of Foreign Portfolio Investor under SEBI's 2019 FPI Regulations: governments and related investors, pension and university funds, and appropriately regulated entities and funds.

In plain language

SEBI's FPI Regulations, 2019 sort foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) into two categories. Category I is decided by who the investor is. It covers three kinds of investor. The first is a government or a government-related body. The second is a pension fund or a university fund. The third is an entity that is appropriately regulated.

The list has one common thread. Someone answerable stands behind the investor. A fund with no regulator can still get into Category I, but only on three conditions. Its investment manager must be appropriately regulated. The manager must itself be registered as Category I. And the manager must take responsibility for all that the fund does.

Anyone who does not fit Category I falls into Category II.

How it works

From Chapter 12, "Category I foreign portfolio investor" includes:

(i) Government and Government-related investors - central banks, sovereign wealth funds, international or multilateral organisations or agencies, including entities controlled or at least 75% directly or indirectly owned by such investors.

(ii) Pension funds and university funds.

(iii) Appropriately regulated entities - insurance or reinsurance entities, banks, asset management companies, investment managers, investment advisors, portfolio managers, broker dealers and swap dealers.

(iv) Entities from FATF member countries (or countries specified by the Central Government by order, agreement or treaty) which are:

  • I. appropriately regulated funds;
  • II. unregulated funds whose investment manager is appropriately regulated and registered as a Category I FPI, provided the manager takes responsibility for all acts of commission or omission of the fund;
  • III. university-related endowments of universities in existence for more than five years.

(v) An entity (A) whose investment manager is from an FATF member country and registered as Category I FPI; or (B) which is at least 75% owned, directly or indirectly, by an entity eligible under (ii), (iii) or (iv) that is from an FATF member country - again with the manager or owner taking responsibility for the applicant's acts.

IFSC. An applicant incorporated or established in an International Financial Services Centre is deemed appropriately regulated.

General FPI eligibility (for either category) includes: not a resident Indian; not an NRI or OCI; resident of a country whose regulator signs the IOSCO MMoU or a bilateral MoU with SEBI; banks from countries whose central bank is a BIS member; no UN Security Council sanctions, and not from an FATF-flagged jurisdiction; fit and proper.

A worked example

Illustrative applicants; the classification rules are the workbook's.

ApplicantCategoryWhy
A foreign central bankIGovernment / Government-related investor
A sovereign wealth fund's wholly owned investment companyIAt least 75% owned by a Government-related investor
A foreign university pension planIPension fund
A regulated insurer from abroadIAppropriately regulated entity
An unregulated fund from an FATF country, managed by a regulated manager registered as Category I, which accepts responsibility for the fundIClause (iv)(II)
An endowment of a university founded 3 years ago, from an FATF countryNot I under (iv)(III) - the university must have existed more than five years
A subsidiary 70% owned by a regulated bank from an FATF countryNot I under (v)(B) - needs at least 75%
A family officeIIListed in Category II

The 70%-owned subsidiary and the young university's endowment would have to qualify under some other clause, or fall into Category II.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 12 (Foreign Portfolio Investors) lists the Category I and Category II definitions, and its review question asks: "A Sovereign Wealth Fund shall be registered under which category under FPI Regulations?" - Category I. Another asks whether a resident Indian can be an FPI (false). The 75% ownership test and the five-year university test are the numbers to learn.

Common exam traps

  • Sovereign wealth funds and central banks are Category I.
  • 75%, not 51%, is the ownership threshold in clauses (i) and (v)(B).
  • University endowments need the university to have existed more than five years.
  • Unregulated funds can be Category I only through a Category I-registered regulated investment manager who takes responsibility for them.
  • IFSC applicants are deemed appropriately regulated.
  • Corporate bodies, family offices and individuals are Category II, not Category I.
  • A resident Indian cannot be an FPI, though resident Indians can be constituents in the limited cases the regulations allow.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series III-A

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it