NISM Professor

Insurance

Also written Insurance (as a risk approach) · Insurance approach to risk · Risk transfer

The risk-management approach that pays an explicit upfront premium to remove the downside while keeping the upside — which in derivatives means buying an option rather than selling a future.

In plain language

The Series I workbook treats insurance as one of four things you can do about price risk, alongside speculation, hedging and diversification. It is not a chapter about the insurance industry.

The distinction that matters is between hedging and insurance:

  • Hedging locks the future rate. The bad outcome goes away, and so does the good one. It costs nothing upfront.
  • Insurance selectively eliminates the negative return but retains the positive one. It has an explicit upfront cost, and it requires a particular derivative — an option — to implement it.

That is the whole trade. A futures hedge is free but symmetric; an option is asymmetric but you pay for the asymmetry, in cash, on day one, whether or not you ever use it.

The workbook makes the analogy directly: an option premium is like a motor insurance premium. If the car is damaged you claim; if the year passes uneventfully you do not get the premium back, and you were still right to pay it.

How it works

For a rupee receivable, insurance means buying a put on USDINR: the right, not the obligation, to sell dollars at the strike. Below the strike you exercise and are protected; above it you let the option lapse and sell your dollars in the market at the better rate.

The floor you have bought is the strike less the premium. Everything above that floor still belongs to you.

Floor rate for a put buyer = Strike − Premium
Ceiling rate for a call buyer = Strike + Premium

The maximum possible loss on the insurance itself is the premium, and never more — which is exactly why the workbook recommends options over futures for contingent cash flows, where the underlying exposure may not materialise at all. A firm bidding for an overseas project that hedges with futures and then loses the bid is left holding a naked speculative position with no limit to its downside. The same firm insured with a put simply lets the option expire and is out the premium.

The formula

Long put  : maximum loss = premium paid
            breakeven    = Strike − Premium
            floor        = Strike − Premium, upside unlimited

Long call : maximum loss = premium paid
            breakeven    = Strike + Premium
            ceiling      = Strike + Premium, downside unlimited

Breakeven is a property of the instrument, not the position: the breakeven of a short put is also Strike − Premium.

A worked example

An exporter expects USD 500,000 in three months — 500 USDINR contracts of USD 1,000 each. Spot is 83.00 and the three-month future is quoted 83.05. He compares two ways of covering it.

Option A — hedge with futures at 83.05. Costs nothing upfront. Locks Rs 4,15,25,000 whatever happens.

Option B — insure with a put. Buy the 83.00 put at a premium of 0.20.

Premium paid = 500,000 × 0.20 = Rs 1,00,000
Floor rate   = 83.00 − 0.20  = 82.80

Now run both against two outcomes:

USDINR at receiptFutures hedgePut insurance
82.0083.05 → Rs 4,15,25,000put exercised, floor 82.80 → Rs 4,14,00,000
84.0083.05 → Rs 4,15,25,000put lapses, 84.00 − 0.20 = 83.80 → Rs 4,19,00,000

When the rupee weakened, insurance earned Rs 3,75,000 more than the hedge. When it strengthened, insurance cost Rs 1,25,000 more. The Rs 1 lakh premium bought the right to keep the upside, and it was money well spent in one scenario and wasted in the other — which is what a premium always is.

Note the floor is a floor, not a lock: the exporter still has unlimited upside above 82.80, which no futures hedge can give him.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 2 (Foreign Exchange Derivatives), section 2.1, carries the four-row table — speculation, hedging, insurance, diversification — and it is examined almost verbatim: "which approach to risk has an explicit upfront cost and requires an option?" is the standard form. Chapter 4 makes the motor-insurance analogy when introducing the option premium, and Chapter 5 applies it as the protective put for hedging contingent receivables and bid exposures.

For life and general insurance products as a financial-planning matter, see term insurance — a different paper and a different meaning of the word.

Common exam traps

  • The exam distinction is "explicit upfront cost". Hedging with futures has costs too — margin, brokerage — but no premium is paid to acquire the protection. That word "explicit" is the discriminator.
  • Insurance keeps the upside; hedging does not. If a question describes an outcome where the participant was protected on the downside and benefited from a favourable move, the instrument was an option.
  • Only buying an option is insurance. Selling one is the opposite: you collect the premium and take on the risk, like an insurer.
  • The premium is sunk on day one. Squaring off an unneeded option recovers only its then market value, which may be far less — the workbook works an exporter who paid 0.075 and unwound at 0.04, a net loss of Rs 700 on USD 20,000.
  • Do not read this entry as being about insurance companies. IRDAI, policies and claims are a different paper; here "insurance" is a category of risk treatment.
  • Options are the right tool for contingent exposures. Futures on an exposure that never materialises turn a hedger into a speculator.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series V-D

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it