Code of Fair Disclosure
Also written Code of practices and procedures for fair disclosure · Code of Fair Disclosure of UPSI
The code every listed company's board must formulate and publish on its website under Regulation 8 of the PIT Regulations, setting out how it will disclose price sensitive information fairly and promptly.
In plain language
Insider trading rules mostly say what people may not do with price sensitive information. The Code of Fair Disclosure is the other half: a listed company's public promise about how it will release that information — promptly, to everyone at once, through a named officer, and never selectively to a favoured analyst or fund.
The logic is simple. The less time unpublished price sensitive information (UPSI) spends inside the company, and the more evenly it reaches the market when it comes out, the smaller the window in which anybody can trade on it.
How it works
The obligation (Regulation 8).
- The board of directors of every company whose securities are listed on a stock exchange shall formulate and publish on its official website a code of practices and procedures for fair disclosure of UPSI, to adhere to each of the principles in Schedule A — without diluting the regulations in any manner.
- The code, and every amendment to it, shall be promptly intimated to the stock exchanges where the securities are listed.
- Under Regulation 3(2A), the board must also make a policy for determination of "legitimate purposes" as part of the "Codes of Fair Disclosure and Conduct".
The eight principles of Schedule A.
- Prompt public disclosure of UPSI that would impact price discovery, no sooner than credible and concrete information comes into being, to make it generally available.
- Uniform and universal dissemination to avoid selective disclosure.
- Designation of a senior officer as a chief investor relations officer to deal with dissemination and disclosure of UPSI.
- Prompt dissemination of UPSI that gets disclosed selectively, inadvertently or otherwise, to make it generally available.
- Appropriate and fair response to queries on news reports and requests from regulators for verification of market rumours.
- Ensuring that information shared with analysts and research personnel is not UPSI.
- Developing best practices to put transcripts or records of analyst meetings and investor relations conferences on the official website.
- Handling of all UPSI on a need-to-know basis.
How it fits with the other code. The Code of Fair Disclosure governs the company's disclosure. The separate code of conduct under Regulation 9 governs trading by designated persons and their immediate relatives, using the minimum standards in Schedule B (listed companies) or Schedule C (intermediaries and fiduciaries). A listed intermediary needs both.
Why "generally available" matters. Information is generally available when it is accessible to the public on a non-discriminatory basis; information published on a stock exchange website ordinarily counts. Unverified events or information reported in print or electronic media do not count.
A worked example
Illustrative facts. Narmada Cables Ltd closes its quarter on 30 June. On 28 July, three days before the board meeting, its CFO meets analysts from two brokerages in Mumbai and, asked about margins, says operating margin is "comfortably above 14%" — a figure not yet published. The stock is at Rs 410.
Walk it through the Code of Fair Disclosure:
| Principle | What went wrong | What the code requires now |
|---|---|---|
| Information to analysts must not be UPSI | The margin figure was UPSI | — |
| Uniform and universal dissemination | Two brokerages heard it; the market did not | — |
| Prompt dissemination of selectively disclosed UPSI | Release the figure to the stock exchanges at once, making it generally available | |
| Transcripts of analyst meetings | Put the record of the meeting on the website | |
| Chief investor relations officer | The CFO spoke outside the designated channel | Route future analyst interactions through the designated officer |
By the time the company releases the figure, one brokerage client has bought 50,000 shares at Rs 412; the stock closes at Rs 455 after the disclosure.
Gain on paper = 50,000 × (455 − 412) = Rs 21,50,000
The company's code does not decide whether that client is liable — Regulation 4 and the insider provisions do. What the code does decide is that the company had a published duty to prevent the selective disclosure and a published duty to cure it immediately. A board that cannot show the code, its intimation to the exchanges, and a record of how the leak was cured has a compliance failure of its own.
Why NISM asks about it
Chapter 7 (SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015), 6% of the paper, carries Regulation 8 and the Schedule A principles, and repeats in section 7.3 that the compliance officer works with the code.
Expect a "which of the following is not a principle of fair disclosure" question — a typical distractor would be "disclosure to institutional investors ahead of retail investors" — and a question on who formulates the code (the board) and where it goes (the company website, with intimation to the stock exchanges).
Common exam traps
- The board formulates the code under Regulation 8. But section 7.3 of the workbook also says the compliance officer "is required to frame a code of fair disclosure and conduct in line with the model code specified under Schedule A". The regulation places the duty on the board; the compliance officer drafts and administers. If a question quotes Regulation 8, answer "board of directors".
- Fair Disclosure (Regulation 8, Schedule A) ≠ Code of Conduct (Regulation 9, Schedules B and C). One is about the company's disclosures, the other about people's trading.
- Every amendment must also be promptly intimated to the stock exchanges, not only the original code.
- Unverified media reports are not "generally available". A newspaper story about results does not free insiders to trade.
- Selective disclosure is cured by prompt general dissemination, not by asking the analysts to keep quiet.
- The code must be published on the official website, not merely approved and filed.
Check yourself
1.The objective of the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations is to prohibit insiders from ___________ on matters relating to insider trading.
- a)Dealing, communicating and counselling — all of these
- b)Dealing only
- c)Communicating only
- d)Counselling only
Show the answer
Answer: (a) Dealing, communicating and counselling — all of these
All three are prohibited, in separate provisions.
Communicating — Regulation 3(1): an insider shall not communicate, provide, or allow access to any unpublished price sensitive information, relating to a company or securities listed or proposed to be listed, to any person including other insiders except where such communication is in furtherance of legitimate purposes, the performance of duties or discharge of legal obligations.
Procuring — Regulation 3(2): no person shall procure from or cause the communication by any insider of unpublished price sensitive information... except in furtherance of legitimate purposes.
Trading — Regulation 4: no insider shall trade in securities that are listed or proposed to be listed on a stock exchange when in possession of unpublished price sensitive information.
You can breach these regulations without buying a share.
Section 15G of the SEBI Act penalises the same three — an insider who deals in securities... on the basis of any unpublished price-sensitive information, who communicates any unpublished price-sensitive information to any person, with or without his request, or who counsels or procures for any other person to deal.
Why the regulations exist: any dealing/trading done by an insider based on information which is not available in the public domain gives an undue advantage to insiders and affects market integrity. This is not in line with the principle of fair and equitable markets.
And the systemic answer: organisations must develop practices based on "need-to-know" principles for treatment of confidential information in their possession, backed by a structured digital database, a Code of Fair Disclosure under Schedule A and a Code of Conduct under Schedules B and C.
One exception runs through all three prohibitions — legitimate purposes, the performance of duties or discharge of legal obligations.
Where this is taught
Free preparation for NISM Series III-ARelated terms
- InsiderAnyone who is a connected person, or who simply possesses or has access to unpublished price sensitive information — possession alone is enough, with no relationship to the company required.
- Unpublished price sensitive informationInformation about a company or its securities that is not generally available and that would, on becoming available, be likely to materially affect the price of the security.
- Designated personsThe people a listed company, intermediary or fiduciary formally names as subject to its insider trading code of conduct, chosen by the access their role gives to price sensitive information.
- Legitimate purposesSharing UPSI in the ordinary course of business with partners, lenders, advisers and similar parties — permitted under the PIT Regulations if not done to evade them; the recipient becomes an insider.
- Structured digital databaseThe tamper-evident internal register every handler of unpublished price sensitive information must maintain, recording the nature of the information and the PAN of everyone who shared it and received it.
- Trading windowA notional window used to monitor trading by designated persons — closed by the compliance officer whenever they can reasonably be expected to possess unpublished price sensitive information.
- Void agreementsUnder Regulation 7J of the PIT Regulations, any term of an agreement or code of conduct that tries to stop a person (other than an advocate) from reporting securities law violations to SEBI is void.