All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Dormant account

Also written NPS dormant account

An NPS account that goes dormant when the subscriber fails to contribute at least Rs 1,000 in a year, and is closed outright once its value falls to zero.

In plain language

An NPS account is meant to keep receiving contributions year after year. If it stops, the system has a specific way of marking it as inactive.

That status is called dormant. It is not an automatic account closure — but if nothing changes, the account can eventually close itself.

How it works

If a subscriber does not contribute at least Rs 1,000 per year to the NPS account, the account becomes dormant. A dormant account is closed when the account value falls to zero — the invested corpus, if any, is left to run down through charges rather than being frozen instantly.

Under the charge structure applicable from January 2026, this status is explicitly built into the fee rules: dormant accounts are not charged, so a dormant account does not have its remaining value eaten away by PoP charges, even though other charges may still apply.

A worked example

Mr Thomas opens an All Citizen Model NPS account and contributes Rs 5,000 in his first year. He then changes jobs and forgets about the account entirely for two years, contributing nothing further — well short of the Rs 1,000-a-year minimum. His account becomes dormant.

Because the account is dormant, the January 2026 charge structure exempts it from PoP charges — the corpus is not steadily reduced by fees while inactive. If Mr Thomas never resumes contributions and the account's residual value eventually falls to zero through other applicable costs, the account is closed. Had he instead contributed even a token Rs 1,000 in year two, the account would have stayed active and avoided dormant status altogether.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 4 covers dormant accounts as part of NPS contribution mechanics, alongside D-Remit and the same-day investment cut-off rules. Expect a direct recall question on the Rs 1,000 annual minimum and the fact that a dormant account is closed only when its value falls to zero, not immediately on becoming dormant.

Common exam traps

  • Rs 1,000 a year is the minimum to avoid dormancy — it is not a minimum per contribution. A subscriber can meet it with a single Rs 1,000 top-up any time in the year.
  • Dormancy is not the same as closure. A dormant account can still hold value and can still be reactivated by resuming contributions; it closes only when the value hits zero.
  • Dormant accounts are exempt from PoP charges under the January 2026 structure — a fact that is easy to overlook when the general charge structure is being tested.

Check yourself

  1. 1.Anil did not contribute the minimum amount to his NPS Tier I account during the financial year. What are the consequences?

    1. a)His account can be frozen and becomes dormant; if Tier I is frozen his Tier II is frozen too; he must make a minimum contribution of Rs 500 to unfreeze it, and a dormant account is closed when its value falls to zero
    2. b)Only his Tier II account is frozen; Tier I continues normally
    3. c)His entire corpus is paid out to him and the PRAN is cancelled
    4. d)Nothing happens, because the NPS has no minimum annual contribution
    Show the answer

    Answer: (a) His account can be frozen and becomes dormant; if Tier I is frozen his Tier II is frozen too; he must make a minimum contribution of Rs 500 to unfreeze it, and a dormant account is closed when its value falls to zero

    Tier I requires at least one contribution made to the Tier I account in a financial year. If the subscriber does not contribute at least Rs.1000 per year to the NPS account, then the account would become dormant. A dormant account will be closed when the account value falls to zero.

    On freezing: the subscribers account can be frozen if the minimum contribution requirement in the year is not met. If the Tier I account of a PRAN is frozen, the Tier II account will also be frozen. To unfreeze the account, the subscriber is required to make a minimum contribution of Rs.500.

    So option A is correct.

    Why the others are wrong:

    • Option B reverses the link. Freezing starts with Tier I and carries over to Tier II. Tier II has no annual minimum of its own.
    • Option C: a frozen or dormant account is not paid out. The corpus stays invested, and a dormant account closes only when the account value falls to zero.
    • Option D: there is a minimum. While there is a minimum limit on the contribution (Rs.1000 per annum), there is no upper limit.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XVII

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it