NISM Professor

Equity Linked Saving Scheme

Also written ELSS · Equity Linked Saving Scheme (ELSS) · Tax saving fund · Equity Linked Savings Scheme

An equity mutual fund category that carries a section 80C deduction of up to Rs 1.5 lakh with a compulsory three-year lock-in — the shortest lock-in of any tax-saving instrument.

In plain language

The government wanted more households to own equity. Section 80C was where it had their attention. ELSS is the bridge it built between the two: an equity mutual fund whose investment qualifies for the same deduction as a life insurance premium or a PPF contribution.

The price of the deduction is a lock-in. Units bought today cannot be redeemed for three years. The workbook makes the comparative point that matters: three years is the shortest lock-in among all tax-saving instruments.

How it works

The deduction. The Income Tax Act allows a deduction under section 80C to the extent of Rs 1.5 lakh in respect of investment made in ELSS — and the workbook attaches a condition that candidates skip: only if the assessee opts for the old tax regime. Under the new regime the deduction is simply unavailable.

The lock-in bites unit by unit. Each purchase has its own three-year clock. A monthly SIP into an ELSS therefore does not become fully free after three years from the first instalment; the instalment paid in month 30 is locked until month 66.

On redemption it is an ordinary equity fund. ELSS invests a large percentage of its portfolio in equity shares, so it satisfies the equity oriented fund test. Gains are long-term by construction — nothing can be redeemed before three years — and are therefore taxed under section 112A: exempt up to Rs 1,25,000 a year, 12.5% above that where STT is paid.

Against the alternatives. The workbook sets ELSS against NPS and fixed-income tax savers such as PPF in Chapter 19. The comparison runs on lock-in, on asset class, and on whether the maturity proceeds are taxed — PPF is an EEE product; ELSS proceeds are taxable as capital gains.

A worked example

Ms Fernandes, in the 30% slab, invests Rs 1,50,000 in an ELSS in June 2021 under the old regime.

In the year of investment: the Rs 1,50,000 is deducted under section 80C. At 30% plus 4% cess, that is Rs 46,800 of tax saved. Her net outlay is Rs 1,03,200.

In July 2024, three years later, the units are worth Rs 2,34,000 and she redeems.

Redemption value              Rs 2,34,000
Less: cost of acquisition     Rs 1,50,000
Long-term capital gain        Rs   84,000
Less: 112A exemption          Rs   84,000   (within the Rs 1,25,000 annual limit)
Tax on redemption             Nil

So she put in Rs 1,03,200 of her own money and took out Rs 2,34,000 with no tax at either end.

Now change one thing: she had opted for the new tax regime. There is no 80C deduction at all, her outlay is the full Rs 1,50,000, and the entire Rs 46,800 advantage vanishes. The fund is the same fund; the regime choice is what the question is really testing.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 11, section 11.6, defines ELSS among the mutual fund terms, and Chapter 19 (Comparison of Products across categories), section 19.2.1, sets ELSS against NPS and fixed-income tax savers in a table. Expect a "shortest lock-in" question, a question on the Rs 1.5 lakh ceiling, and at least one that turns on the old-regime condition.

Common exam traps

  • The 80C deduction is an old-regime benefit only. The workbook says so explicitly; questions set in the new regime are testing exactly this.
  • Three years, not one. ELSS is the shortest lock-in among tax savers, but it is still a lock-in — the 12-month equity holding period is irrelevant here.
  • The lock-in runs per instalment. An SIP does not unlock in one go.
  • Rs 1.5 lakh is the section 80C ceiling for everything together — EPF, PPF, life premium, housing loan principal and ELSS share it.
  • Redemption is not tax-free. It is a section 112A gain; the Rs 1,25,000 exemption may absorb it, but that is an exemption, not an exclusion.
  • ELSS units cannot be pledged or redeemed during the lock-in, so it is not an emergency-fund instrument however liquid the underlying equity is.

Check yourself

  1. 1.What is the compulsory lock-in period for an Equity Linked Saving Scheme?

    1. a)1 year
    2. b)3 years, the shortest among all tax-saving instruments
    3. c)5 years
    4. d)15 years
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) 3 years, the shortest among all tax-saving instruments

    ELSS funds have a compulsory lock-in period of 3 YEARS, WHICH IS THE SHORTEST AMONGST ALL TAX-SAVING INSTRUMENTS. The Income Tax Act allows a deduction under section 80C to the extent of Rs 1.5 lakh in respect of investment in ELSS, but only if the assessee opts for the old tax regime — which is why, under the new regime, ELSS must be judged purely as an equity fund with a lock-in.

  2. 2.What is the lock-in period for an Equity Linked Savings Scheme, and what happens after it?

    1. a)3 years lock in, after which it can be withdrawn at any time
    2. b)5 years lock in, after which partial withdrawal is possible
    3. c)15 years lock in, with partial withdrawal possible after 5 years
    4. d)Lock in till the age of 60 years
    Show the answer

    Answer: (a) 3 years lock in, after which it can be withdrawn at any time

    ELSS has a 3 years lock in. Post that it can be withdrawn at any time. It is the shortest lock-in among the tax-saving instruments compared — and also the riskiest, since the entire investment is in equities, making the risk of loss of invested capital HIGH.

    Option 3 describes PPF (15 years from inception, partial withdrawal after 5 years) and option 4 describes NPS Tier 1.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series X-B

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it