NISM Professor

Exchange Traded Fund

Also written ETF · Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) · Exchange Traded Funds · Gold ETF · Silver ETF

A mutual fund scheme whose units are listed and traded on a stock exchange like a share, so you transact at live prices through the day instead of at one end-of-day NAV.

In plain language

An ordinary open-ended fund has exactly one price a day. Whatever time you place your order, you get the NAV struck at the close.

An ETF removes that. Its units are listed, they trade on the exchange from 9:15 to 3:30 like any share, and there is a live bid and offer all day. The scheme itself is almost always passive — it replicates an index, or holds gold or silver — so there is very little for a fund manager to do, and the expense ratio is correspondingly small.

The trade-off is that you now have two prices to think about, not one: the NAV, which is what a unit is worth, and the market price, which is what somebody is willing to pay for it right now. They are usually close. They are not the same number.

How it works

Three rules from the SEBI categorisation and operating framework do most of the work:

  • An index fund or ETF must hold at least 95% of total assets in the securities of the index it tracks. That is what makes the tracking tight.
  • The total expense ratio of an index fund or ETF, including investment and advisory fees, cannot exceed 0.90% of daily net assets — against slabs starting at 2.10% for an actively managed equity scheme.
  • ETF units are compulsorily held in demat form, because only demat securities can be traded on an exchange, and ETFs are compulsorily listed on at least one stock exchange.

So an ETF needs a demat account and a broker. That is the price of intraday dealing.

The formula

Premium / discount to NAV (%) = (Market price − NAV) ÷ NAV × 100

Positive is a premium — you paid more than the units are worth. Negative is a discount.

A worked example

A Nifty 50 ETF closes the day at an NAV of Rs 245.60 a unit. During the session it traded between Rs 244.90 and Rs 247.10, and you bought 1,000 units at Rs 246.85.

Premium paid = (246.85 − 245.60) ÷ 245.60 = +0.51%
Rupee cost of the premium = 1,000 × Rs 1.25 = Rs 1,250

You own Rs 2,45,600 of index exposure and paid Rs 2,46,850 for it.

Now set that against the running cost. Compare holding Rs 5,00,000 for five years in the ETF at a TER of 0.20% against an actively managed equity scheme of Rs 2,000 crore, whose base expense limit under the slabs works out to about 1.76%:

ETF at 0.20%Active scheme at ~1.76%
Cost in year 1Rs 1,000Rs 8,800
Cost over 5 years (on a flat Rs 5 lakh)Rs 5,000Rs 44,000

The 0.51% you overpaid on entry is recovered in about four months of the expense-ratio difference. The lesson runs both ways: a wide premium matters far less than the TER over a long holding, but on a short holding or a thinly traded ETF it is the dominant cost.

Why NISM asks about it

Box 2.1 of Chapter 2 (Concept and Role of a Mutual Fund) introduces ETFs as the answer to the poor liquidity and NAV discounts of listed close-ended schemes. Chapter 3 gives the demat and listing requirements, Chapter 5 the categorisation rule (95% of assets in the index), and Chapter 7 the 0.90% expense ceiling. Expect questions on why an ETF price can differ from its NAV, on the demat requirement, and on which TER ceiling applies to an index fund or ETF.

Common exam traps

  • Market price is not NAV. Only an open-ended non-listed scheme transacts at NAV. An ETF transacts at whatever the exchange quotes, which can be at a premium or a discount.
  • The 0.90% ceiling is not the same as the fund-of-funds ceiling. A fund of funds investing in liquid schemes, index funds and ETFs has its own 0.90% ceiling including the weighted average TER of the underlying schemes — a different calculation.
  • An ETF is a mutual fund scheme, not a share. It is governed by the MF Regulations, not by listing rules for companies.
  • You need a demat account and a broker. An investor without one cannot buy an ETF, however small the expense ratio — which is exactly what the index fund route is for.
  • Gold ETFs and Silver ETFs are ETFs by structure but track a commodity price, not an equity index, so the 95%-of-index rule is replaced by their own investment norms.
  • The workbook warns that intraday prices "might fluctuate quite a bit" — liquidity, not NAV, decides what you actually pay.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series X-B

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it