All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Family Office

Also written Family offices · Single family office · Multi family office · Family office consultant

A private office that manages one or more wealthy families' money — a non-institutional investor under the workbook's classification, and one of the main domestic sources of AIF capital in India.

In plain language

When a family becomes rich enough, managing the money turns into a full-time job. So the family sets up an office to do it. That office is a family office.

It is a private set-up, not a product sold to the public. It answers to the family and to nobody else.

In the workbook's classification a family office is a non-institutional investor. It is not retail, because the sums are large. It is not institutional either, because it is not a mutual fund, a pension fund, an insurer or a foreign portfolio investor. It sits in the middle group.

For an AIF manager, family offices matter for one reason: this is where a lot of the domestic money comes from. After 2012 the Indian AIF industry was led by high net worth accounts, private banking managers, investment advisers and family offices.

And they behave differently from an institution. A family office asks a simple question about every deal. Where else could we get this return for this risk? That is opportunity cost, and it is a harder test than a pension fund applies.

How it works

The workbook never gives a one-line definition of a family office. It tells you three things instead: where a family office sits in the investor taxonomy, what it supplies to the AIF market, and how it behaves.

1. Its class. Chapter 1 puts it in the residual class: a non-institutional investor means any investor other than a retail investor, and includes family offices, high networth individuals and ultra-high networth individuals. Since a retail individual investor under the ICDR Regulations, 2018 is one bidding not more than Rs 2 lakh, a family office is never retail.

2. What it supplies. Section 7.1.1.1 lists it among the key investors in the AIF industry. In the years following 2012 the Indian AIF industry was led by HNI accounts under private banking managers and investment advisers, family offices, corporate investors, domestic bank promoted AIF funds and offshore investors. Family office consultants played a vital role in deploying funds to the AIF industry, as a diversification tool. Chapter 11 adds that family offices, along with structured credit NBFCs, add to the supply of private credit, and that institutional investors and family offices have become the primary source of private capital.

3. How it behaves. Section 11.7.7 draws the contrast that gets examined. A family office looks at an investment through the lens of opportunity cost, and checks where else it could get similar or better returns for similar risk. An institutional investor such as a pension fund is more inclined toward strategic and long-term investments, and less inclined towards predictable, short-term deployment of capital. Section 11.3.1 makes the same point about initial screening: sovereign wealth funds and family offices have a different risk-return objective from high net worth individuals.

Where family offices show up in the rules. They meet the same conditions as any other AIF investor — a minimum investment of Rs 1 crore, in a scheme with a minimum corpus of Rs 20 crore and no more than 1,000 investors, raised only by private placement. The workbook names them, along with institutional investors, non-resident investors and ultra-high and high net worth individuals, as the investors for whom Category III AIFs are suited. And in angel investing, angel investors are HNIs who invest in their individual capacity or through their family offices with own funds.

A worked example

The Deshpande Family Office manages Rs 1,800 crore for three generations of a promoter family. It is evaluating a Rs 60 crore commitment to a Category II private credit AIF offering a target net return of 14%.

The pension fund sitting next to it in the same fund-raise asks: does this fit our long-term liability profile? The family office asks a different question — the opportunity cost question.

AlternativeExpected returnLiquidityVerdict
The private credit AIF14%Locked for the fund lifeOn the table
Listed AAA corporate bonds7.6%SellableHalf the return
Direct commercial real estate12%Illiquid, plus management effortComparable return, more work
Listed equityUnknownSellableWrong risk shape for this bucket

On that comparison the AIF wins, and the office commits Rs 60 crore — which clears the Rs 1 crore minimum investment sixty times over.

Now the classification test. The office is a non-institutional investor. Its Rs 60 crore cheque does not make it institutional; the class follows what kind of entity it is, not how much it puts in. Had the same family put Rs 1.8 lakh into an IPO in an individual member's name, that application would have been a retail individual investor bid, because it is under Rs 2 lakh.

And the same money can wear two hats. One member of the family is an accredited investor who also backs start-ups directly. When he writes a Rs 50 lakh angel cheque through the family office, the workbook describes him exactly: an angel investor putting in own funds, in individual capacity or through their family office.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 7 (Alternative Investment Funds Ecosystem), section 7.1.1.1, lists family offices among the investors and contributors to an AIF. Chapter 1 supplies the classification, Chapter 6 the suitability judgement, Chapter 11 the behaviour, and Chapter 17 the angel-investing role.

Expect a classification question first: a family office is a non-institutional investor. Then expect the suitability question — which investors are Category III AIFs meant for — where family offices are on the list alongside institutional investors, non-residents and UHNIs. The sharpest question is the stakeholder one from section 11.7.7, which asks how a family office evaluates an investment differently from a pension fund. The answer is opportunity cost against strategic, long-term intent.

Common exam traps

  • A family office is non-institutional, not institutional. The institutional list is closed: mutual funds, pension funds, insurance companies, hedge funds, AIFs and foreign portfolio investors.
  • Size does not promote it. A family office running thousands of crore is still non-institutional.
  • Family office and HNI are named together but are not the same thing. An HNI is a person; a family office is the vehicle a family invests through.
  • The opportunity-cost lens belongs to the family office; the strategic long-term lens belongs to the pension fund. Section 11.7.7 states both, and the pair is examinable.
  • The minimum investment is still Rs 1 crore. Being a family office is not a concession; only accredited investor status relaxes the minimum.
  • An angel investor investing through a family office is still using own funds. The workbook says so expressly, so it does not turn the angel cheque into a pooled fund.

Check yourself

  1. 1.Why has Indian AIF growth been led by HNIs and family offices rather than by insurance companies and pension funds, even though the latter form the largest pool of domestic capital?

    1. a)Insurance companies and pension funds are prohibited from investing in AIFs
    2. b)Insurance companies and pension funds have regulatory caps on their asset exposures in alternative investments, particularly in the unlisted space
    3. c)HNIs get a lower management fee
    4. d)Insurance companies and pension funds have short investment horizons
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) Insurance companies and pension funds have regulatory caps on their asset exposures in alternative investments, particularly in the unlisted space

    In India, Insurance Companies and Pension Funds have regulatory caps on their asset exposures in alternative investments in the unlisted space in particular. Since these funds form the largest pool of domestic capital in India, their role is crucial in the development of AIF industry in India. They are capped, not prohibited — so option (a) overstates it. Option (d) is the opposite of the truth: Insurance companies are ideally positioned with large, long-term, corpuses to become AIF investors. The gap they leave is filled by the group the workbook names: HNI accounts under Private Banking Managers and investment advisors, family offices, corporate investors, domestic bank promoted AIF funds and offshore investors.

  2. 2.Which of the following is a non-institutional investor?

    1. a)A pension fund with a focus on long term investing
    2. b)A foreign fund registered with SEBI as a foreign investor having investment operations in India
    3. c)A domestic family office operating in the Indian stock market
    4. d)A foreign company involved in non-financial business operations in India
    Show the answer

    Answer: (c) A domestic family office operating in the Indian stock market

    This is the workbook's own sample question. Non-institutional investor means any investor other than a retail investor and includes family offices, high networth individuals, ultra-high networth individuals etc. Options (a) and (b) are institutional — Institutional Investors comprises mutual funds, pension funds, insurance companies, hedge funds, alternative investment funds, foreign portfolio investors. Option (d) describes an operating business, not an investor class in the securities market at all.

  3. 3.Which category of AIF does the workbook describe as the riskiest, and whom does it suit?

    1. a)Category I, suited to retail investors
    2. b)Category III, suited only to institutional investors, family offices, non-resident investors and ultra-high and high net worth individuals
    3. c)Category II, suited to all investors equally
    4. d)All three carry identical risk
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) Category III, suited only to institutional investors, family offices, non-resident investors and ultra-high and high net worth individuals

    Category III AIFs deploy complex strategies with a view to make short-term gains and generate alpha. Among all three categories of AIFs, Category III AIF is the riskiest one. Category III AIFs are most suited, only for institutional investors, family offices, Non-resident investors and ultra-high and high net worth individuals, considering the risk-return profile of the fund. Such funds are allowed to take leverage positions through Futures and Options (F&O) contracts, structured products, margin trading and arbitrage strategies, which adds to the overall portfolio risk.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XIX-C

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it