All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Interest coverage ratio

EBIT divided by interest expense — how many times operating profit covers the interest bill. Below 1, the business is not earning enough to pay its interest.

In plain language

A company with a lot of debt has a lot of interest to pay. Whether it is heading for a default on that interest can be seen, as the workbook puts it, simply by comparing its earnings with the interest.

A ratio of 5 means operating profit is five times the interest bill — plenty of room. A ratio below 1 means the business earns less than it owes in interest, and is either borrowing more or raising equity just to keep going.

How it works

Section 8.11.3 pairs the ratio with Debt/Equity as the two leverage ratios. D/E measures how much debt there is; interest coverage measures whether the company can carry it.

The numerator is EBIT — earnings before interest and tax — which section 8.4.2 calls "a useful metric to measure the ability of the firm to meet the annual interest or financial expenses", and names as a significant input for this ratio.

The workbook's real example. Bharti Airtel in FY 2019 reported EBIT of Rs 47,626 million against finance costs of Rs 1,10,134 million, so operating profit was "way too inadequate to even service the interest expense". Kingfisher Airlines is the warning case: EBIT much lower than interest for several years, borrowing to pay interest, until lenders refused to put in more.

The checklist test. The Chapter 13 sample checklist treats a business as low-leverage if D/E < 1 and interest coverage > 3, continuously over the last five years.

The formula

Interest coverage ratio = EBIT ÷ Interest expense

A worked example

From the workbook's figures (Rs million, FY 2019):

Interest coverage = 47,626 ÷ 1,10,134 = 0.43×

Earnings covered less than half the interest bill.

A downturn test — illustrative, Rs crore. An auto components maker:

Normal yearDemand slumpSlump + costlier debt
EBIT240144144
Interest606080
Coverage4.0×2.4×1.8×

In a normal year it passes the checklist's > 3 test comfortably. A 40% fall in EBIT takes it below 3. If its loans are then refinanced at higher rates and interest rises to Rs 80 crore, coverage falls to 1.8× — still above 1, but with little room left before earnings stop covering interest.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 8 (Company Analysis – Financial Analysis) defines the ratio among the leverage ratios in section 8.11.3 and uses Bharti Airtel and Kingfisher to illustrate it. Chapter 13 (Qualities of a Good Research Report) sets the > 3 benchmark in its quantitative checklist. Expect a computation from a P&L and a question on what a ratio below 1 signals.

Common exam traps

  • EBIT, not EBITDA and not PAT. EBITDA flatters coverage by ignoring depreciation; PAT is already after interest, so it cannot be the numerator.
  • It covers interest only, not principal. The workbook says so explicitly — "we are not talking about principal repayment yet". A company can cover interest and still be unable to repay a maturing loan.
  • Below 1, or negative, is a distress signal, not a rounding issue: earnings are less than interest, or there are losses while interest is still due.
  • The checklist wants the ratio above 3 for five continuous years, not in the latest year only.
  • Interest coverage and D/E answer different questions. A company with modest D/E but collapsing EBIT can still fail the coverage test.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XV

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it